Case study: SIGTERM termination analysis for solve.mjs #1172
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Case study analysis for understanding why the solve.mjs process was terminated unexpectedly.
Key Findings
Root Cause: The solve.mjs process received a SIGTERM signal (signal 15) from an external source after ~36 minutes of execution.
Exit Code Clarification: The exit code 144 mentioned in the log came from the
bun testsubprocess (128 + 16 = signal 16), not from solve.mjs itself.Termination Sequence:
20:06:14.681Z- Cleanup function triggered (SIGTERM received)20:06:14.875Z- Last TaskOutput result received (exit code 144 from bun test)20:06:14.976Z- "Terminated" message logged, process exitsWork in Progress: At termination time, the AI was actively running tests to verify fixes for issue When hive.mjs executes solve.mjs actual commands with
./solve.mjs ...should be logged #131 (Agent CLI stderr/stdout output issue).Files Added
docs/case-studies/issue-1171/analysis.md- Comprehensive analysis document with timeline, root cause, and recommendationsdocs/case-studies/issue-1171/original-log.txt- Complete original log (13,956 lines) preserved from GistRecommendations
Issue Reference
Fixes #1171
This case study was created automatically by the AI issue solver
Sources: