Skip to content

Conversation

@richm
Copy link
Contributor

@richm richm commented Jan 7, 2026

Ansible 2.20 has deprecated the use of Ansible facts as variables. For
example, ansible_distribution is now deprecated in favor of
ansible_facts["distribution"]. This is due to making the default
setting INJECT_FACTS_AS_VARS=false. For now, this will create WARNING
messages, but in Ansible 2.24 it will be an error.

See https://docs.ansible.com/projects/ansible/latest/porting_guides/porting_guide_core_2.20.html#inject-facts-as-vars

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson rmeggins@redhat.com

Summary by Sourcery

Update Ansible role variables and tests to use ansible_facts-based access instead of deprecated top-level fact variables.

Enhancements:

  • Replace direct use of deprecated Ansible fact variables with ansible_facts lookups in role defaults and test fixtures to be compatible with INJECT_FACTS_AS_VARS=false.

Tests:

  • Adjust test comments and test variable definitions to reference ansible_facts keys rather than deprecated fact variables.

…stead

Ansible 2.20 has deprecated the use of Ansible facts as variables.  For
example, `ansible_distribution` is now deprecated in favor of
`ansible_facts["distribution"]`.  This is due to making the default
setting `INJECT_FACTS_AS_VARS=false`.  For now, this will create WARNING
messages, but in Ansible 2.24 it will be an error.

See https://docs.ansible.com/projects/ansible/latest/porting_guides/porting_guide_core_2.20.html#inject-facts-as-vars

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
@richm richm requested a review from spetrosi as a code owner January 7, 2026 20:54
@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Refactors Ansible variable usage to rely on ansible_facts lookups instead of deprecated implicit fact variables, updating both role defaults and associated test fixtures/comments.

Flow diagram for using ansible_facts when INJECT_FACTS_AS_VARS is false

flowchart TD
  Start["Playbook runs role"] --> GatherFacts["Ansible gathers facts"]
  GatherFacts --> CheckSetting{"INJECT_FACTS_AS_VARS is true?"}

  CheckSetting -->|"Yes"| DeprecatedPath["Deprecated: tasks may use ansible_distribution"]
  CheckSetting -->|"No"| FactsMap["Facts available only via ansible_facts map"]

  FactsMap --> GetDistribution["Use ansible_facts['distribution']"]
  GetDistribution --> CheckRHDistro{"ansible_facts['distribution'] in __pam_pwd_rh_distros?"}
  GetDistribution --> CheckRHDistroFedora{"ansible_facts['distribution'] in __pam_pwd_rh_distros_fedora?"}

  CheckRHDistro --> SetVarRHDistro["Set __pam_pwd_is_rh_distro"]
  CheckRHDistroFedora --> SetVarRHDistroFedora["Set __pam_pwd_is_rh_distro_fedora"]

  SetVarRHDistro --> RoleTasks["Role tasks use new boolean vars"]
  SetVarRHDistroFedora --> RoleTasks
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Use ansible_facts keys instead of deprecated top-level fact variables in role logic for distro detection.
  • Replace ansible_distribution checks in Red Hat/Fedora detection variables with ansible_facts['distribution'] membership checks in defaults.
  • Mirror the same ansible_facts-based Red Hat/Fedora detection logic in the test vars fixture to keep tests aligned with role behavior.
defaults/main.yml
tests/vars/rh_distros_vars.yml
Update test documentation comments to describe fact access via ansible_facts instead of deprecated implicit fact variables.
  • Adjust commented examples of distribution/os_family templating to reference ansible_facts['distribution'], ansible_facts['distribution_version'], ansible_facts['distribution_major_version'], and ansible_facts['os_family'].
  • Keep the surrounding varfiles templating logic unchanged, relying only on the updated comment guidance for fact access.
tests/tests_include_vars_from_parent.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@richm
Copy link
Contributor Author

richm commented Jan 7, 2026

[citest]

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • In tests/tests_include_vars_from_parent.yml, the updated comments reference ansible_facts[...] while the varfiles expression still uses facts[...]; consider aligning these to avoid confusion about which variable set is actually used.
  • Where you now access ansible_facts['distribution'], consider using a safer pattern like ansible_facts.get('distribution', '') (or a default filter) if this role may run with fact gathering disabled to avoid undefined-variable issues.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- In `tests/tests_include_vars_from_parent.yml`, the updated comments reference `ansible_facts[...]` while the `varfiles` expression still uses `facts[...]`; consider aligning these to avoid confusion about which variable set is actually used.
- Where you now access `ansible_facts['distribution']`, consider using a safer pattern like `ansible_facts.get('distribution', '')` (or a `default` filter) if this role may run with fact gathering disabled to avoid undefined-variable issues.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@richm richm merged commit fed1bef into main Jan 7, 2026
30 checks passed
@richm richm deleted the inject-facts-as-vars branch January 7, 2026 22:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants