fix: initialize dock color theme with default value

[18202781743]

1. Changed m_dockColorTheme initialization from uninitialized to -1
2. Prevents potential undefined behavior when accessing uninitialized
   variable
3. Ensures consistent behavior when dock color theme is not set

fix: 初始化 dock 颜色主题默认值

1. 将 m_dockColorTheme 从未初始化状态改为初始化为 -1
2. 防止访问未初始化变量时出现未定义行为
3. 确保当 dock 颜色主题未设置时行为一致

pms: BUG-314263

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

• Initialize m_dockPosition and m_dockColorTheme to 0 in PluginManagerExtension.

[deepin-ci-robot]

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见：

1. 初始化成员变量：

   • 在类定义中直接初始化成员变量是一个好的做法，可以避免在使用这些变量之前出现未定义的行为。因此，将 m_dockPosition 和 m_dockColorTheme 的默认值设置为 0 是合理的。

2. 代码格式：

   • 虽然代码格式没有明显的错误，但建议检查整个文件以确保一致性。例如，成员变量声明的顺序是否遵循了项目的编码规范。

3. 注释和文档：

   • 考虑为 m_dockPosition 和 m_dockColorTheme 添加注释，说明这些变量的用途和可能的取值范围，有助于其他开发者理解代码。

4. 类型安全性：

   • 确保 uint32_t 类型适合存储 m_dockPosition 和 m_dockColorTheme 的值。如果这些值可能超出 uint32_t 的范围，应该考虑使用更大的数据类型。

5. 命名规范：

   • 确保变量名遵循项目的命名规范。例如，如果项目使用驼峰命名法，那么变量名应该使用 m_dockPosition 和 m_dockColorTheme 而不是 m_dockPosition 和 m_dockColorTheme。

6. 代码审查：

   • 进行代码审查时，确保审查者理解这些变量的用途和初始化的必要性。如果这些变量在类的其他部分有特定的初始化逻辑，应该确保这些逻辑与新的默认值相兼容。

综上所述，代码的修改是合理的，但建议进行进一步的审查以确保代码质量和一致性。

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request initializes the m_dockPosition and m_dockColorTheme member variables in the PluginManagerExtensionPrivate class to prevent potential undefined behavior.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Initialize class members to default values.	Initialize m_dockPosition to 0. Initialize m_dockColorTheme to 0.	panels/dock/pluginmanagerextension_p.h

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @18202781743 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• The description mentions initializing m_dockColorTheme to -1, but the code initializes it to 0; please clarify or update the description.
• This PR also initializes m_dockPosition; consider updating the title and description to reflect this change.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[deepin-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, mhduiy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• debian/deepin/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[18202781743]

/forcemerge

[deepin-bot]

This pr force merged! (status: blocked)