fix: Fix the storage notification that says there is no signal

[pengfeixx]

Fix the storage notification that says there is no signal

Log: Fix the storage notification that says there is no signal
pms: BUG-333027

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

• Replace m_accessor->invokeAction with invokeNotify in NotifyModel to ensure storage notifications emit their signal

[deepin-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pengfeixx

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• debian/deepin/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Replaces the direct action invocation with a notify invocation in the storage notification path to ensure a signal is emitted when the notification is triggered.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Ensure storage notifications emit signals by invoking notify instead of action	Replaced m_accessor->invokeAction with m_accessor->invokeNotify Added a comment explaining the need to emit a signal for storage notifications	panels/notification/center/notifymodel.cpp

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[deepin-ci-robot]

deepin pr auto review

我对这段代码的修改进行审查，并提供以下改进意见：

1. 代码逻辑：

• 修改将 invokeAction 改为 invokeNotify，并添加了注释说明这是为了"存储通知需要发出信号"
• 这个改动看起来是为了在执行动作时能够发出通知信号，这是一个合理的设计变更

2. 代码质量：

• 添加的注释有助于理解代码意图，但可以更详细一些，比如说明为什么需要发出信号
• 建议补充 invokeNotify 方法的文档注释，说明其参数和返回值
• 考虑添加错误处理机制，比如当 invokeNotify 失败时的处理逻辑

3. 代码性能：

• 这处修改不会引入明显的性能问题，因为只是方法名的变更和添加了一个注释
• 但需要注意 invokeNotify 方法的实现是否会影响性能

4. 代码安全：

• 建议检查 invokeNotify 方法是否对输入参数进行了适当的验证，特别是 actionId 参数
• 考虑添加日志记录，以便追踪通知操作的执行情况

5. 改进建议：

void NotifyModel::invokeAction(qint64 id, const QString &actionId)
{
    if (!entity.isValid()) {
        qWarning() << "Invalid notification entity ID:" << id;
        return;
    }

    // 存储通知需要发出信号，以便UI层能够响应通知动作
    // 并更新相关状态
    bool success = m_accessor->invokeNotify(entity, actionId);
    if (!success) {
        qWarning() << "Failed to invoke action" << actionId << "for notification ID:" << id;
        return;
    }

    remove(id);
}

6. 其他考虑：

• 确认 invokeNotify 方法是否在所有情况下都应该被调用，或者是否需要条件判断
• 考虑是否需要在调用 remove 之前检查操作是否成功
• 如果这是一个公共API，建议添加更多的参数验证和错误处理

总体而言，这个修改看起来是为了实现通知信号机制，这是一个合理的设计变更。但建议添加更多的错误处理和日志记录，以提高代码的健壮性和可维护性。

[sourcery-ai]

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}