Skip to content

sync: from linuxdeepin/dtkwidget#166

Merged
18202781743 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
sync-pr-682-nosync
Sep 2, 2025
Merged

sync: from linuxdeepin/dtkwidget#166
18202781743 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
sync-pr-682-nosync

Conversation

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkwidget.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkwidget#682

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkwidget.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkwidget#682
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

这段代码的diff显示了对DTabBar类的两个修改,我来分析一下这些修改并提出改进建议:

  1. layoutTab函数中添加了Q_ASSERT(tab);断言:
QTabBarPrivate::Tab *tab = d->at(index);
+ Q_ASSERT(tab);

改进意见:

  • 这个断言是好的,因为它确保了tab指针不为空,提高了代码的健壮性。
  • 但是,考虑到这是一个debug-only的断言,在生产环境中可能不会起作用。建议同时考虑在release版本中添加适当的错误处理逻辑,比如:
if (!tab) {
    qWarning() << "Invalid tab index:" << index;
    return;
}
  1. paintEvent函数中修改了selected tab的绘制条件:
- if (selected >= 0) {
+ if (selected >= 0 && d->validIndex(selected)) {

改进意见:

  • 这个修改很好,增加了对selected索引有效性的检查,避免了潜在的越界访问。
  • 建议保持这个修改,因为它提高了代码的安全性。
  • 考虑到validIndex可能是一个相对较新的函数,建议添加注释说明这个检查的目的,例如:
// 确保选中的tab索引有效,避免潜在的越界访问
if (selected >= 0 && d->validIndex(selected)) {

总体评价:
这两个修改都是积极的,提高了代码的健壮性和安全性。第一个修改增加了对tab指针的有效性检查,第二个修改增加了对selected索引的有效性检查。这些修改有助于防止潜在的空指针解引用和数组越界访问。

建议:

  1. 对于第一个修改,考虑添加release版本的错误处理。
  2. 对于第二个修改,建议添加注释说明检查的目的。
  3. 考虑在整个类中添加更多的类似检查,特别是在访问数组或容器元素之前。
  4. 可以考虑使用Qt的QTC_ASSERT宏,它可以在debug和release版本中都起作用。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit cc18af7 into master Sep 2, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
@18202781743 18202781743 deleted the sync-pr-682-nosync branch September 2, 2025 03:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments