Skip to content

Conversation

@18202781743
Copy link
Contributor

@18202781743 18202781743 requested review from BLumia and mhduiy October 16, 2025 05:17
deepin-ci-robot added a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6core that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkcore.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkcore#512
@18202781743 18202781743 requested a review from ComixHe October 16, 2025 05:17
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin pr auto review

这段代码是一个虚表(vtable)钩子实现的一部分,主要检查对象是否已经被钩子处理过。我来对这段代码进行审查:

语法逻辑

  1. 代码逻辑基本正确,但有一个潜在问题:objToGhostVfptr.value(obj)和后面的_obj类型不匹配。objToGhostVfptr的key是quintptr**(即_obj类型),但代码中直接使用了obj作为key。

代码质量

  1. 日志输出使用了qCDebug,这是一个好的实践,但日志信息可以更详细一些,比如添加ghost vtable的地址信息。
  2. 注释清晰,解释了代码的目的和逻辑流程。
  3. 错误处理较为完善,考虑到了地址重用的情况。

代码性能

  1. 当前实现使用了哈希表查找(objToGhostVfptr.containsobjToGhostVfptr.value),时间复杂度为O(1),性能较好。
  2. 但是连续进行了两次查找操作(value和contains),可以优化为一次查找。

代码安全

  1. 代码正确处理了地址重用的情况,避免了潜在的内存访问错误。
  2. 类型转换(quintptr**)(obj)没有进行有效性检查,如果传入的obj是nullptr,会导致解引用空指针。

改进建议

bool DVtableHook::hasVtable(const void *obj)
{
    // 参数有效性检查
    if (!obj) {
        qCDebug(vtableHook) << "hasVtable: null object pointer";
        return false;
    }
    
    quintptr **_obj = (quintptr**)(obj);
    
    // 一次性获取ghost vtable,避免重复查找
    auto it = objToGhostVfptr.find(_obj);
    if (it == objToGhostVfptr.end()) {
        return false;
    }

    // 检查当前对象的 vtable 指针是否指向我们记录的 ghost vtable
    quintptr *ghost_vtable = it.value();
    if (*_obj != adjustToEntry(ghost_vtable)) {
        // vtable 不匹配,说明地址被重用了
        qCDebug(vtableHook) << "hasVtable: vtable mismatch! Address reused by different object."
                           << "obj:" << QString("0x%1").arg((quintptr)obj, 0, 16)
                           << "current vtable:" << QString("0x%1").arg((quintptr)*_obj, 0, 16)
                           << "expected vtable:" << QString("0x%1").arg((quintptr)ghost_vtable, 0, 16);
        return false;
    }

    return true;
}

改进点:

  1. 添加了nullptr检查,提高安全性
  2. 使用迭代器代替直接查找,减少哈希表查找次数
  3. 增加了日志信息的详细程度,包含当前vtable和期望vtable的地址
  4. 保持了原有的错误处理逻辑,但使代码更健壮
  5. 代码结构更清晰,逻辑流程更易理解

这些改进不会显著影响性能,但能提高代码的安全性和可维护性。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, ComixHe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit 840b931 into linuxdeepin:master Oct 16, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
18202781743 pushed a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6core that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkcore.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkcore#512
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants