Skip to content

Conversation

datcactus
Copy link
Contributor

linuxserver.io


  • I have read the contributing guideline and understand that I have made the correct modifications

Description

Update upstream port for qui to reflect v0.3.0 breaking change (8080 -> 7476)

Benefits of this PR and context

Ensures auto conf generation is correct for v0.3.0 onward

How Has This Been Tested?

Local SWAG test port update

Source / References

https://github.com/autobrr/qui/releases/tag/v0.3.0

⚠️ BREAKING CHANGE

Docker Users: The default internal port has changed from 8080 to 7476. This affects Docker healthchecks and port mappings.

Update your docker-compose.yml from :8080 to :7476

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from PRs to PRs Approved in Issue & PR Tracker Aug 28, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Roxedus Roxedus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please update the date on the first line

Copy link
Member

@Roxedus Roxedus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please update the date on the first line

@datcactus datcactus force-pushed the fix/update-qui-port branch from 731d909 to a939242 Compare August 28, 2025 22:10
@datcactus datcactus requested a review from Roxedus August 28, 2025 22:11
@LinuxServer-CI LinuxServer-CI moved this from PRs Approved to PRs Ready For Team Review in Issue & PR Tracker Aug 28, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from PRs Ready For Team Review to PRs Approved in Issue & PR Tracker Aug 28, 2025
@Roxedus Roxedus merged commit 8a51855 into linuxserver:master Aug 28, 2025
3 checks passed
@LinuxServer-CI LinuxServer-CI moved this from PRs Approved to Done in Issue & PR Tracker Aug 28, 2025
@datcactus datcactus deleted the fix/update-qui-port branch August 28, 2025 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants