-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 1.2k
ci: Add vLLM support to integration testing infrastructure #3128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
8951765
2b19f98
dc965ba
0ec2427
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ EXCLUDE_TESTS="builtin_tool or safety_with_image or code_interpreter or test_rag | |
|
|
||
| # Additional exclusions for vllm setup | ||
| if [[ "$TEST_SETUP" == "vllm" ]]; then | ||
| EXCLUDE_TESTS="${EXCLUDE_TESTS} or test_inference_store_tool_calls" | ||
| EXCLUDE_TESTS="${EXCLUDE_TESTS} or test_inference_store_tool_calls or test_text_chat_completion_structured_output" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. what about adding these to the skips in the test files directly? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The problem here is because of the model, Our skips in test files are all based on provider If we can get to the point that this job is running, I'll happy test other models to see if I can get ride of this line alltogether. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yes please, ci w/ a model that passes more tests. having a gap between what ci test and what developers see in the test suite is going to lead to bugs and confusion. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've opened an alternative PR that instead use qwen3 #3545 |
||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| PYTEST_PATTERN="not( $EXCLUDE_TESTS )" | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.