Skip to content

Actions: llvm/llvm-project

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
584,447 workflow run results
584,447 workflow run results

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

[NFC] Fix unary minus operator on unsigned type warning Issue Release Workflow #482952: Issue comment #153887 (comment) created by Nadharm
Skipped
Skipped
static_cast involving pointers to members is too strict during constant evaluation Issue Release Workflow #482951: Issue comment #154033 (comment) created by Halalaluyafail3
2s
2s
Comment on an issue Comment on an issue #241889: completed by Nadharm
10s
10s
Comment on an issue Comment on an issue #241888: completed by pedroclobo
1s
1s
[Headers][X86] Allow pmuludq/pmuldq to be used in constexpr PR Request Release Note #42281: Pull request #153293 closed by pedroclobo
1s pedroclobo:x86-muludq-muldq-constexpr
pedroclobo:x86-muludq-muldq-constexpr
1s
[Headers][X86] Allow pmuludq/pmuldq to be used in constexpr Add buildbot information to first PRs from new contributors #51558: Pull request #153293 closed by pedroclobo
14s
14s
[Headers][X86] Allow pmuludq/pmuldq to be used in constexpr CI Checks #105938: Pull request #153293 closed by pedroclobo
2s pedroclobo:x86-muludq-muldq-constexpr
pedroclobo:x86-muludq-muldq-constexpr
2s
[NFC] Fix unary minus operator on unsigned type warning Check code formatting #209207: Pull request #153887 synchronize by Nadharm
3m 2s Nadharm:dev/nadharm/upstreaming/fix-unary-minus-operator-warning
Nadharm:dev/nadharm/upstreaming/fix-unary-minus-operator-warning
3m 2s
[NFC] Fix unary minus operator on unsigned type warning CI Checks #105937: Pull request #153887 synchronize by Nadharm
46m 20s Nadharm:dev/nadharm/upstreaming/fix-unary-minus-operator-warning
Nadharm:dev/nadharm/upstreaming/fix-unary-minus-operator-warning
46m 20s
[NFC] Fix unary minus operator on unsigned type warning Labelling new pull requests #252075: Pull request #153887 synchronize by Nadharm
13s
13s
Assertion failure in X86RegisterInfo.cpp Commit Access Greeter #20219: Issue #31315 labeled by EugeneZelenko
1s
1s
Assertion failure in X86RegisterInfo.cpp Issue Subscriber #99737: Issue #31315 labeled by EugeneZelenko
21s
21s
Comment on an issue Comment on an issue #241887: completed by wenju-he
1s
1s
[NFC][libclc] add missing __CLC_ prefix all internal macros PR Request Release Note #42280: Pull request #153523 closed by wenju-he
1s wenju-he:prefix-all-macro-with-__CLC
wenju-he:prefix-all-macro-with-__CLC
1s
[NFC][libclc] add missing __CLC_ prefix all internal macros CI Checks #105936: Pull request #153523 closed by wenju-he
1s wenju-he:prefix-all-macro-with-__CLC
wenju-he:prefix-all-macro-with-__CLC
1s
[NFC][libclc] add missing __CLC_ prefix all internal macros Add buildbot information to first PRs from new contributors #51557: Pull request #153523 closed by wenju-he
17s
17s
[cmake] Introduce LLVM_DISABLE_PROJECTS to easily exclude projects Labelling new pull requests #252074: Pull request #141535 synchronize by hamidelmaazouz
8s
8s
Comment on an issue Comment on an issue #241886: completed by ojhunt
13s
13s
Comment on an issue Comment on an issue #241885: completed by wenju-he
15s
15s
Comment on an issue Comment on an issue #241884: completed by ojhunt
Skipped
Skipped
[clang] return type not correctly deduced for discarded lambdas CI Checks #105934: Pull request #153921 synchronize by ojhunt
31m 38s users/ojhunt/PR-153884
users/ojhunt/PR-153884
31m 38s
[clang] return type not correctly deduced for discarded lambdas Check code formatting #209205: Pull request #153921 synchronize by ojhunt
2m 1s users/ojhunt/PR-153884
users/ojhunt/PR-153884
2m 1s
[clang] return type not correctly deduced for discarded lambdas Labelling new pull requests #252073: Pull request #153921 synchronize by ojhunt
10s
10s
[clang] return type not correctly deduced for discarded lambdas Labelling new pull requests #252072: Pull request #153921 ready_for_review by ojhunt
11s
11s
[libclc] Implement __clc_get_local_size/__clc_get_max_sub_group_size for amdgcn Issue Release Workflow #482950: Issue comment #153785 (comment) created by wenju-he
1s
1s