[mlir][linalg] Add a new helper hook: hasVectorizationImpl

mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Linalg/Transforms/Transforms.h

@@ -762,6 +762,14 @@ LogicalResult copyToGPUPrivateMemory(OpBuilder &b, Value src, Value dst);
 /// memory is freed when going outside of the scope.
 LogicalResult deallocateGPUPrivateMemory(OpBuilder &, Value /*buffer*/);
 
+/// Return true if there's dedicated logic in the Linalg Vectorizer to
+/// vectorize this Op, false otherwise.
+///
+/// Note that this helper merely implements a very high level check and that the
+/// vectorizer also requires various additional pre-conditions to be met for it
+/// to work (these are checked by the vectorizer itself).
+bool hasVectorizationImpl(Operation *);
+
 /// Emit a suitable vector form for an operation. If provided,
 /// `inputVectorSizes` are used to vectorize this operation. `inputVectorSizes`
 /// must match the rank of the iteration space of the operation and the sizes

mlir/lib/Dialect/Linalg/TransformOps/LinalgTransformOps.cpp

@@ -3411,11 +3411,11 @@ struct VectorizationPattern : public RewritePattern {
         flatten1DDepthwiseConv(flattenConv) {}
   LogicalResult matchAndRewrite(Operation *op,
                                 PatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
-    LinalgOp linalgOp = dyn_cast<LinalgOp>(op);
-    if (!linalgOp)
-      return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(op, "expected Linalg Op");
-    return vectorize(rewriter, linalgOp, /*inputVectorSizes=*/{},
-                     /*scalableVecDims=*/{}, vectorizeNDExtract,
+    if (!linalg::hasVectorizationImpl(op))
+      return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(op,
+                                         "Unsupported Op, cannot vectorize");
+    return vectorize(rewriter, op, /*inputVectorSizes=*/{},
+                     /*inputScalableVecDims=*/{}, vectorizeNDExtract,
                      flatten1DDepthwiseConv);
   }
 
@@ -3496,8 +3496,7 @@ DiagnosedSilenceableFailure transform::VectorizeOp::apply(
 
   // TODO: Check that the correct number of vectorSizes was provided.
   for (Operation *target : targets) {
-    if (!isa<linalg::LinalgOp, tensor::PadOp, tensor::PackOp, tensor::UnPackOp>(
-            target)) {
+    if (!linalg::hasVectorizationImpl(target)) {
       return mlir::emitSilenceableFailure(target->getLoc())
              << "Unsupported Op, cannot vectorize";
     }

mlir/lib/Dialect/Linalg/Transforms/Vectorization.cpp

@@ -2129,6 +2129,11 @@ static void convertAffineApply(RewriterBase &rewriter, LinalgOp linalgOp) {
   }
 }
 
+bool mlir::linalg::hasVectorizationImpl(Operation *op) {
+  return isa<linalg::LinalgOp, tensor::PadOp, tensor::PackOp, tensor::UnPackOp>(
+      op);
+}
+
 /// Emit a suitable vector form for an operation. If provided,
 /// `inputVectorSizes` are used to vectorize this operation.
 /// `inputVectorSizes` must match the rank of the iteration space of the

mlir/test/Dialect/Linalg/vectorization-with-patterns.mlir

@@ -2010,3 +2010,68 @@ module attributes {transform.with_named_sequence} {
 // CHECK:           %[[VAL_8:.*]] = vector.transpose %[[VAL_7]], [1, 2, 3, 0] : vector<1x1x12x197xf32> to vector<1x12x197x1xf32>
 // CHECK:           %[[VAL_9:.*]] = vector.transfer_write %[[VAL_8]], %[[VAL_3]]{{\[}}%[[VAL_2]], %[[VAL_2]], %[[VAL_2]], %[[VAL_2]]] {in_bounds = [true, true, true, true]} : vector<1x12x197x1xf32>, tensor<1x12x197x1xf32>
 // CHECK:           return %[[VAL_9]] : tensor<1x12x197x1xf32>
+
+// -----
+
+// Input identical as the test in vectorization.mlir. Output is different -
+// vector sizes are inferred (rather than user-specified) and hence _no_
+// masking was used.
+
+func.func @test_vectorize_pack(%arg0: tensor<32x8x16xf32>, %arg1: tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>) -> tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32> {
+  %pack = tensor.pack %arg0 outer_dims_perm = [1, 2, 0] inner_dims_pos = [2, 1] inner_tiles = [16, 2] into %arg1 : tensor<32x8x16xf32> -> tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>
+  return %pack : tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>
+}
+
+module attributes {transform.with_named_sequence} {
+  transform.named_sequence @__transform_main(%arg0: !transform.any_op {transform.readonly}) {
+    %0 = transform.structured.match ops{["tensor.pack"]} in %arg0 : (!transform.any_op) -> !transform.any_op
+    %1 = transform.get_parent_op %0 {isolated_from_above} : (!transform.any_op) -> !transform.any_op
+    %2 = transform.structured.vectorize_children_and_apply_patterns %1 : (!transform.any_op) -> !transform.any_op
+    transform.yield
+  }
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL:   func.func @test_vectorize_pack(
+// CHECK-SAME:      %[[VAL_0:.*]]: tensor<32x8x16xf32>,
+// CHECK-SAME:      %[[VAL_1:.*]]: tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>) -> tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32> {
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_2:.*]] = arith.constant 0.000000e+00 : f32
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_3:.*]] = arith.constant 0 : index
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_4:.*]] = vector.transfer_read %[[VAL_0]]{{\[}}%[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]]], %[[VAL_2]] {in_bounds = [true, true, true]} : tensor<32x8x16xf32>, vector<32x8x16xf32>
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_5:.*]] = vector.shape_cast %[[VAL_4]] : vector<32x8x16xf32> to vector<32x4x2x1x16xf32>
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_6:.*]] = vector.transpose %[[VAL_5]], [1, 3, 0, 4, 2] : vector<32x4x2x1x16xf32> to vector<4x1x32x16x2xf32>
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_7:.*]] = tensor.empty() : tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_8:.*]] = vector.transfer_write %[[VAL_6]], %[[VAL_7]]{{\[}}%[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]]] {in_bounds = [true, true, true, true, true]} : vector<4x1x32x16x2xf32>, tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>
+// CHECK:           return %[[VAL_8]] : tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>
+
+// -----
+
+// Input identical as the test in vectorization.mlir. Output is different -
+// vector sizes are inferred (rather than user-specified) and hence _no_
+// masking was used.
+
+func.func @test_vectorize_padded_pack(%arg0: tensor<32x7x15xf32>, %arg1: tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32>) -> tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32> {
+  %pad = arith.constant 0.000000e+00 : f32
+  %pack = tensor.pack %arg0 padding_value(%pad : f32) inner_dims_pos = [2, 1] inner_tiles = [16, 2] into %arg1 : tensor<32x7x15xf32> -> tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32>
+  return %pack : tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32>
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL:   func.func @test_vectorize_padded_pack(
+// CHECK-SAME:      %[[VAL_0:.*]]: tensor<32x7x15xf32>,
+// CHECK-SAME:      %[[VAL_1:.*]]: tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32>) -> tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32> {
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_2:.*]] = arith.constant 0.000000e+00 : f32
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_3:.*]] = arith.constant 0 : index
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_4:.*]] = vector.transfer_read %[[VAL_0]]{{\[}}%[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]]], %[[VAL_2]] {in_bounds = [true, false, false]} : tensor<32x7x15xf32>, vector<32x8x16xf32>
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_5:.*]] = vector.shape_cast %[[VAL_4]] : vector<32x8x16xf32> to vector<32x4x2x1x16xf32>
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_6:.*]] = vector.transpose %[[VAL_5]], [0, 1, 3, 4, 2] : vector<32x4x2x1x16xf32> to vector<32x4x1x16x2xf32>
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_7:.*]] = tensor.empty() : tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32>
+// CHECK:           %[[VAL_8:.*]] = vector.transfer_write %[[VAL_6]], %[[VAL_7]]{{\[}}%[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]], %[[VAL_3]]] {in_bounds = [true, true, true, true, true]} : vector<32x4x1x16x2xf32>, tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32>
+// CHECK:           return %[[VAL_8]] : tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32>
+
+module attributes {transform.with_named_sequence} {
+  transform.named_sequence @__transform_main(%arg0: !transform.any_op {transform.readonly}) {
+    %0 = transform.structured.match ops{["tensor.pack"]} in %arg0 : (!transform.any_op) -> !transform.any_op
+    %1 = transform.get_parent_op %0 {isolated_from_above} : (!transform.any_op) -> !transform.any_op
+    %2 = transform.structured.vectorize_children_and_apply_patterns %1 : (!transform.any_op) -> !transform.any_op
+    transform.yield
+  }
+}

mlir/test/Dialect/Linalg/vectorization.mlir

@@ -666,6 +666,10 @@ module attributes {transform.with_named_sequence} {
 
 // -----
 
+// Input identical as the test in vectorization-with-patterns.mlir. Output is
+// different - vector sizes are inferred (rather than user-specified) and hence
+// masking was used.
+
 func.func @test_vectorize_pack(%arg0: tensor<32x8x16xf32>, %arg1: tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>) -> tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32> {
   %pack = tensor.pack %arg0 outer_dims_perm = [1, 2, 0] inner_dims_pos = [2, 1] inner_tiles = [16, 2] into %arg1 : tensor<32x8x16xf32> -> tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>
   return %pack : tensor<4x1x32x16x2xf32>
@@ -692,6 +696,10 @@ module attributes {transform.with_named_sequence} {
 
 // -----
 
+// Input identical as the test in vectorization-with-patterns.mlir. Output is
+// different - vector sizes are inferred (rather than user-specified) and hence
+// masking was used.
+
 func.func @test_vectorize_padded_pack(%arg0: tensor<32x7x15xf32>, %arg1: tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32>) -> tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32> {
   %pad = arith.constant 0.000000e+00 : f32
   %pack = tensor.pack %arg0 padding_value(%pad : f32) inner_dims_pos = [2, 1] inner_tiles = [16, 2] into %arg1 : tensor<32x7x15xf32> -> tensor<32x4x1x16x2xf32>