-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
[SimplifyLibCalls] Add f128 type for merging sqrt into the power of exp #112373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[SimplifyLibCalls] Add f128 type for merging sqrt into the power of exp #112373
Conversation
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: None (lizhijin1024) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112373.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
index db2acb9eed0938..aa7864ad4f6c0e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
@@ -2720,6 +2720,9 @@ Value *LibCallSimplifier::mergeSqrtToExp(CallInst *CI, IRBuilderBase &B) {
ExpLb = LibFunc_exp;
Exp2Lb = LibFunc_exp2;
Exp10Lb = LibFunc_exp10;
+ } else if (CI->getType()->getScalarType()->isFP128Ty()) {
+ ExpLb = LibFunc_expl;
+ Exp2Lb = LibFunc_exp2l;
} else
return nullptr;
} else
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/sqrt.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/sqrt.ll
index f72fe5a6a5817b..6168a61cf86cb0 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/sqrt.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/sqrt.ll
@@ -201,6 +201,25 @@ define <2 x float> @sqrt_exp_vec(<2 x float> %x) {
ret <2 x float> %res
}
+define dso_local fp128 @sqrt_exp_long_double(fp128 %x, fp128 %y) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @sqrt_exp_long_double(
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[MERGED_SQRT:%.*]] = fmul fast fp128 [[X:%.*]], 0xL00000000000000003FFE000000000000
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = call fast fp128 @llvm.exp.f128(fp128 [[MERGED_SQRT]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[MERGED_SQRT1:%.*]] = fmul fast fp128 [[Y:%.*]], 0xL00000000000000003FFE000000000000
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call fast fp128 @llvm.exp2.f128(fp128 [[MERGED_SQRT1]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ADD:%.*]] = fadd fast fp128 [[TMP0]], [[TMP1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret fp128 [[ADD]]
+;
+entry:
+ %0 = call fast fp128 @llvm.exp.f128(fp128 %x)
+ %1 = call fast fp128 @llvm.sqrt.f128(fp128 %0)
+ %2 = call fast fp128 @llvm.exp2.f128(fp128 %y)
+ %3 = call fast fp128 @llvm.sqrt.f128(fp128 %2)
+ %add = fadd fast fp128 %1, %3
+ ret fp128 %add
+}
+
declare i32 @foo(double)
declare double @sqrt(double) readnone
declare float @sqrtf(float)
@@ -212,3 +231,6 @@ declare double @exp2(double)
declare double @exp10(double)
declare <2 x float> @llvm.exp.v2f32(<2 x float>)
declare <2 x float> @llvm.sqrt.v2f32(<2 x float>)
+declare fp128 @llvm.exp.f128(fp128)
+declare fp128 @llvm.sqrt.f128(fp128)
+declare fp128 @llvm.exp2.f128(fp128)
|
| ret <2 x float> %res | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| define dso_local fp128 @sqrt_exp_long_double(fp128 %x, fp128 %y) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't need dso_local
| %0 = call fast fp128 @llvm.exp.f128(fp128 %x) | ||
| %1 = call fast fp128 @llvm.sqrt.f128(fp128 %0) | ||
| %2 = call fast fp128 @llvm.exp2.f128(fp128 %y) | ||
| %3 = call fast fp128 @llvm.sqrt.f128(fp128 %2) | ||
| %add = fadd fast fp128 %1, %3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test the different cases in different functions.
Use minimal fast math flags, this looks like it only requires reassoc. Add an additional test which shows the preservation behavior of other fast math flags.
Also test the same situation with equivalent library calls instead of intrinsics (and the mixed intrinsic + libcall case)
| Exp2Lb = LibFunc_exp2; | ||
| Exp10Lb = LibFunc_exp10; | ||
| } else if (CI->getType()->getScalarType()->isFP128Ty()) { | ||
| ExpLb = LibFunc_expl; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This intrinsic->intrinsic transform really shouldn't depend on the libcall availability...
No description provided.