[clang][NFC] add release note for n3030 support #115648
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: None (h-vetinari) ChangesFollow-up to #107260 CC @Fznamznon @AaronBallman Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115648.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index c3424e0e6f34c9..6953a4e320ca92 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ C2y Feature Support
which adds the ``i`` and ``j`` suffixes for the creation of a ``_Complex``
constant value. Clang has always supported these suffixes as a GNU extension,
so ``-Wgnu-imaginary-constant`` no longer has effect in C modes, as this is
- not a C2y extension in C. ``-Wgnu-imaginary-constant`` still applies in C++
+ now a C2y extension in C. ``-Wgnu-imaginary-constant`` still applies in C++
modes.
- Clang updated conformance for `N3370 <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3370.htm>`_
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ C23 Feature Support
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Clang now supports `N3029 <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3029.htm>`_ Improved Normal Enumerations.
+- Clang now supports `N3030 <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3030.htm>`_ Enhancements to Enumerations.
Non-comprehensive list of changes in this release
-------------------------------------------------
|
Fznamznon
reviewed
Nov 11, 2024
Co-authored-by: Mariya Podchishchaeva <[email protected]>
Fznamznon
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2024
AaronBallman
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2024
Collaborator
AaronBallman
left a comment
AaronBallman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM and thanks for the drive-by typo fix. :-)
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the reviews! I don't have the commit bit, so would rely on someone pushing the button. :) |
Collaborator
|
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/78/builds/9487 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference |
Groverkss
pushed a commit
to iree-org/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #107260
CC @Fznamznon @AaronBallman