Skip to content

Conversation

@ostannard
Copy link
Collaborator

This would have turned the bug fixed in #117146 from a miscompilation into an assertion failure.

This would have turned the bug fixed in llvm#117146 from a miscompilation
into an assertion failure.
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Dec 9, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64

Author: Oliver Stannard (ostannard)

Changes

This would have turned the bug fixed in #117146 from a miscompilation into an assertion failure.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119216.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp (+20)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp
index 8a3ed10b8e0bd2..fd24e49f948a20 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp
@@ -2555,6 +2555,14 @@ unsigned AArch64InstrInfo::getLoadStoreImmIdx(unsigned Opc) {
   case AArch64::ST4H_IMM:
   case AArch64::ST4W_IMM:
   case AArch64::STGPi:
+  case AArch64::STGPreIndex:
+  case AArch64::STZGPreIndex:
+  case AArch64::ST2GPreIndex:
+  case AArch64::STZ2GPreIndex:
+  case AArch64::STGPostIndex:
+  case AArch64::STZGPostIndex:
+  case AArch64::ST2GPostIndex:
+  case AArch64::STZ2GPostIndex:
   case AArch64::STNPDi:
   case AArch64::STNPQi:
   case AArch64::STNPSi:
@@ -2598,6 +2606,8 @@ unsigned AArch64InstrInfo::getLoadStoreImmIdx(unsigned Opc) {
   case AArch64::LDPWpre:
   case AArch64::LDPXpost:
   case AArch64::LDPXpre:
+  case AArch64::STGPpre:
+  case AArch64::STGPpost:
   case AArch64::STPDpost:
   case AArch64::STPDpre:
   case AArch64::STPQpost:
@@ -4167,7 +4177,11 @@ bool AArch64InstrInfo::getMemOpInfo(unsigned Opcode, TypeSize &Scale,
     break;
   case AArch64::LDG:
   case AArch64::STGi:
+  case AArch64::STGPreIndex:
+  case AArch64::STGPostIndex:
   case AArch64::STZGi:
+  case AArch64::STZGPreIndex:
+  case AArch64::STZGPostIndex:
     Scale = TypeSize::getFixed(16);
     Width = TypeSize::getFixed(16);
     MinOffset = -256;
@@ -4334,13 +4348,19 @@ bool AArch64InstrInfo::getMemOpInfo(unsigned Opcode, TypeSize &Scale,
     MaxOffset = 7;
     break;
   case AArch64::ST2Gi:
+  case AArch64::ST2GPreIndex:
+  case AArch64::ST2GPostIndex:
   case AArch64::STZ2Gi:
+  case AArch64::STZ2GPreIndex:
+  case AArch64::STZ2GPostIndex:
     Scale = TypeSize::getFixed(16);
     Width = TypeSize::getFixed(32);
     MinOffset = -256;
     MaxOffset = 255;
     break;
   case AArch64::STGPi:
+  case AArch64::STGPpost:
+  case AArch64::STGPpre:
     Scale = TypeSize::getFixed(16);
     Width = TypeSize::getFixed(16);
     MinOffset = -64;

@ostannard
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ping

Copy link
Collaborator

@davemgreen davemgreen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, providing that none of the callers of getMemOpInfo will now go wrong with the function returning true. It looks like they should be OK.

@ostannard ostannard merged commit e31c70d into llvm:main Dec 16, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants