Skip to content

[ML Inliner] Fix inconsistancy between CallGraph and FunctionLevels #122830

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[ML Inliner] Fix inconsistancy between CallGraph and FunctionLevels #122830

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
7355c60
[ML Inliner] Fix inconsistancy between CallGraph and FunctionLevels
DataCorrupted Jan 14, 2025
c668980
Update llvm/lib/Analysis/MLInlineAdvisor.cpp
DataCorrupted Jan 14, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion llvm/lib/Analysis/MLInlineAdvisor.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -189,7 +189,9 @@ MLInlineAdvisor::MLInlineAdvisor(
}

unsigned MLInlineAdvisor::getInitialFunctionLevel(const Function &F) const {
return CG.lookup(F) ? FunctionLevels.at(CG.lookup(F)) : 0;
return FunctionLevels.find(CG.lookup(F)) != FunctionLevels.end()
? FunctionLevels.at(CG.lookup(F))
: 0;
}

void MLInlineAdvisor::onPassEntry(LazyCallGraph::SCC *CurSCC) {
Expand Down
Loading