[ubsan] Parse and use <cutoffs[0,1,2]=70000;cutoffs[5,6,8]=90000> in LowerAllowCheckPass

clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp

@@ -794,12 +794,37 @@ static void addSanitizers(const Triple &TargetTriple,
     PB.registerOptimizerLastEPCallback(SanitizersCallback);
   }
 
-  if (LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested()) {
+  bool lowerAllowCheck = LowerAllowCheckPass::IsRequested();
+  // Is there a non-zero cutoff?
+  static const double SanitizerMaskCutoffsEps = 0.000000001f;
+  for (unsigned int i = 0; i < SanitizerKind::SO_Count; ++i) {
+    std::optional<double> maybeCutoff = CodeGenOpts.SanitizeSkipHotCutoffs[i];
+    lowerAllowCheck |= (maybeCutoff.has_value() &&
+                        (maybeCutoff.value() > SanitizerMaskCutoffsEps));
+  }
+
+  if (lowerAllowCheck) {
     // We want to call it after inline, which is about OptimizerEarlyEPCallback.
     PB.registerOptimizerEarlyEPCallback([&](ModulePassManager &MPM,
                                             OptimizationLevel Level,
                                             ThinOrFullLTOPhase Phase) {
       LowerAllowCheckPass::Options Opts;
+
+      // SanitizeSkipHotCutoffs stores doubles with range [0, 1]
+      // Opts.cutoffs wants ints with range [0, 999999]
+      for (unsigned int i = 0; i < SanitizerKind::SO_Count; ++i) {
+        std::optional<double> maybeCutoff =
+            CodeGenOpts.SanitizeSkipHotCutoffs[i];
+        if (maybeCutoff.has_value() &&
+            (maybeCutoff.value() > SanitizerMaskCutoffsEps)) {
+          Opts.cutoffs.push_back(
+              std::clamp((int)(maybeCutoff.value() * 1000000), 0, 999999));
+        } else {
+          // Default is don't skip the check
+          Opts.cutoffs.push_back(0);
+        }
+      }
+
       MPM.addPass(createModuleToFunctionPassAdaptor(LowerAllowCheckPass(Opts)));
     });
   }

clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp

@@ -3607,29 +3607,35 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitCheck(
   llvm::Value *RecoverableCond = nullptr;
   llvm::Value *TrapCond = nullptr;
   bool NoMerge = false;
+  // Expand checks into:
+  //   (Check1 || !allow_ubsan_check) && (Check2 || !allow_ubsan_check) ...
+  // We need separate allow_ubsan_check intrinsics because they have separately
+  // specified cutoffs.
+  // This expression looks expensive but will be simplified after
+  // LowerAllowCheckPass.
+  static const double SanitizerMaskCutoffsEps = 0.000000001f;
   for (auto &[Check, Ord] : Checked) {
+    llvm::Value *GuardedCheck = Check;
+    if (ClSanitizeGuardChecks ||
+        (CGM.getCodeGenOpts().SanitizeSkipHotCutoffs[Ord] >
+         SanitizerMaskCutoffsEps)) {
+      llvm::Value *Allow = Builder.CreateCall(
+          CGM.getIntrinsic(llvm::Intrinsic::allow_ubsan_check),
+          llvm::ConstantInt::get(CGM.Int8Ty, Ord));
+      GuardedCheck = Builder.CreateOr(Check, Builder.CreateNot(Allow));
+    }
+
     // -fsanitize-trap= overrides -fsanitize-recover=.
     llvm::Value *&Cond = CGM.getCodeGenOpts().SanitizeTrap.has(Ord) ? TrapCond
                          : CGM.getCodeGenOpts().SanitizeRecover.has(Ord)
                              ? RecoverableCond
                              : FatalCond;
-    Cond = Cond ? Builder.CreateAnd(Cond, Check) : Check;
+    Cond = Cond ? Builder.CreateAnd(Cond, GuardedCheck) : GuardedCheck;
 
     if (!CGM.getCodeGenOpts().SanitizeMergeHandlers.has(Ord))
       NoMerge = true;
   }
 
-  if (ClSanitizeGuardChecks) {
-    llvm::Value *Allow =
-        Builder.CreateCall(CGM.getIntrinsic(llvm::Intrinsic::allow_ubsan_check),
-                           llvm::ConstantInt::get(CGM.Int8Ty, CheckHandler));
-
-    for (llvm::Value **Cond : {&FatalCond, &RecoverableCond, &TrapCond}) {
-      if (*Cond)
-        *Cond = Builder.CreateOr(*Cond, Builder.CreateNot(Allow));
-    }
-  }
-
   if (TrapCond)
     EmitTrapCheck(TrapCond, CheckHandler, NoMerge);
   if (!FatalCond && !RecoverableCond)

clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp

@@ -2314,7 +2314,6 @@ bool CompilerInvocation::ParseCodeGenArgs(CodeGenOptions &Opts, ArgList &Args,
   Opts.SanitizeSkipHotCutoffs = parseSanitizerWeightedKinds(
       "-fsanitize-skip-hot-cutoff=",
       Args.getAllArgValues(OPT_fsanitize_skip_hot_cutoff_EQ), Diags);
-
   Opts.EmitVersionIdentMetadata = Args.hasFlag(OPT_Qy, OPT_Qn, true);
 
   if (!LangOpts->CUDAIsDevice)

clang/test/CodeGen/allow-ubsan-check-inline.c

@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o - %s -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow -fsanitize-skip-hot-cutoff=signed-integer-overflow=0.000001 -O3 -mllvm -lower-allow-check-random-rate=1 -Rpass=lower-allow-check -Rpass-missed=lower-allow-check -fno-inline 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=NOINL --implicit-check-not="remark:"
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o - %s -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow -fsanitize-skip-hot-cutoff=signed-integer-overflow=0.000001 -O3 -mllvm -lower-allow-check-random-rate=1 -Rpass=lower-allow-check -Rpass-missed=lower-allow-check 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=INLINE --implicit-check-not="remark:"
+//
+// -ubsan-guard-checks is deprecated and will be removed in the future;
+// use -fsanitize-skip-hot-cutoff, as shown above.
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o - %s -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow -mllvm -ubsan-guard-checks -O3 -mllvm -lower-allow-check-random-rate=1 -Rpass=lower-allow-check -Rpass-missed=lower-allow-check -fno-inline 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=NOINL --implicit-check-not="remark:"
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o - %s -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow -mllvm -ubsan-guard-checks -O3 -mllvm -lower-allow-check-random-rate=1 -Rpass=lower-allow-check -Rpass-missed=lower-allow-check 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=INLINE --implicit-check-not="remark:"