-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
release/20.x: [LV] Forget LCSSA phi with new pred before other SCEV invalidation. (#119897) #126542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@nikic What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-vectorizers @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: None (llvmbot) ChangesBackport 3706dfe Requested by: @fhahn Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126542.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
index 06c2a91f89b1c5b..0ceeec48487f692 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
@@ -2888,10 +2888,6 @@ void InnerLoopVectorizer::fixVectorizedLoop(VPTransformState &State) {
if (EnableVPlanNativePath)
fixNonInductionPHIs(State);
- // Forget the original basic block.
- PSE.getSE()->forgetLoop(OrigLoop);
- PSE.getSE()->forgetBlockAndLoopDispositions();
-
// After vectorization, the exit blocks of the original loop will have
// additional predecessors. Invalidate SCEVs for the exit phis in case SE
// looked through single-entry phis.
@@ -2901,6 +2897,10 @@ void InnerLoopVectorizer::fixVectorizedLoop(VPTransformState &State) {
for (PHINode &PN : Exit->phis())
PSE.getSE()->forgetLcssaPhiWithNewPredecessor(OrigLoop, &PN);
+ // Forget the original basic block.
+ PSE.getSE()->forgetLoop(OrigLoop);
+ PSE.getSE()->forgetBlockAndLoopDispositions();
+
// Don't apply optimizations below when no vector region remains, as they all
// require a vector loop at the moment.
if (!State.Plan->getVectorLoopRegion())
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/invalidate-scev-at-scope-after-vectorization.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/invalidate-scev-at-scope-after-vectorization.ll
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..235a8f0fa34a839
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/invalidate-scev-at-scope-after-vectorization.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -passes='print<scalar-evolution>,loop-vectorize' -force-vector-width=4 -scalar-evolution-classify-expressions=false -S %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Test case for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/119665.
+
+; %loop.2's backedge-taken-count depends on %add.1 from %loop.1 via its
+; corresponding SCEV at the scope of %loop.2. After vectorizing %loop.1, %add.1
+; isn't available at the entry of %loop.2 anymore and %add.1 at %loop.2's scope
+; must be invalidated, as well as %loop.2's backedge-taken count.
+define void @test_invalidate_scevs_at_scope(ptr %p) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test_invalidate_scevs_at_scope(
+; CHECK-SAME: ptr [[P:%.*]]) {
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ENTRY:.*]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 false, label %[[SCALAR_PH:.*]], label %[[VECTOR_PH:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[VECTOR_PH]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[VECTOR_BODY:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[VECTOR_BODY]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDEX:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, %[[VECTOR_PH]] ], [ [[INDEX_NEXT:%.*]], %[[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[VEC_IND:%.*]] = phi <4 x i32> [ <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>, %[[VECTOR_PH]] ], [ [[VEC_IND_NEXT:%.*]], %[[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = load i32, ptr [[P]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[BROADCAST_SPLATINSERT:%.*]] = insertelement <4 x i32> poison, i32 [[TMP0]], i64 0
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[BROADCAST_SPLAT:%.*]] = shufflevector <4 x i32> [[BROADCAST_SPLATINSERT]], <4 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> zeroinitializer
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = add <4 x i32> [[BROADCAST_SPLAT]], [[VEC_IND]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDEX_NEXT]] = add nuw i32 [[INDEX]], 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[VEC_IND_NEXT]] = add <4 x i32> [[VEC_IND]], splat (i32 4)
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[INDEX_NEXT]], 100
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[TMP2]], label %[[MIDDLE_BLOCK:.*]], label %[[VECTOR_BODY]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP0:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK: [[MIDDLE_BLOCK]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP3:%.*]] = extractelement <4 x i32> [[TMP1]], i32 3
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 false, label %[[EXIT_1:.*]], label %[[SCALAR_PH]]
+; CHECK: [[SCALAR_PH]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[BC_RESUME_VAL:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 100, %[[MIDDLE_BLOCK]] ], [ 0, %[[ENTRY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP_1:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP_1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_1:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[BC_RESUME_VAL]], %[[SCALAR_PH]] ], [ [[IV_1_NEXT:%.*]], %[[LOOP_1]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP4:%.*]] = load i32, ptr [[P]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ADD_1:%.*]] = add i32 [[TMP4]], [[IV_1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_1_NEXT]] = add i32 [[IV_1]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[C_1:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[IV_1]], 100
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[C_1]], label %[[EXIT_1]], label %[[LOOP_1]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP3:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK: [[EXIT_1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ADD_LCSSA:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[ADD_1]], %[[LOOP_1]] ], [ [[TMP3]], %[[MIDDLE_BLOCK]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SMAX:%.*]] = call i32 @llvm.smax.i32(i32 [[ADD_LCSSA]], i32 100)
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP5:%.*]] = sub i32 [[SMAX]], [[ADD_LCSSA]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP6:%.*]] = zext i32 [[TMP5]] to i64
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP7:%.*]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[TMP6]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[MIN_ITERS_CHECK:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[TMP7]], 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[MIN_ITERS_CHECK]], label %[[SCALAR_PH2:.*]], label %[[VECTOR_PH3:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[VECTOR_PH3]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[N_MOD_VF:%.*]] = urem i64 [[TMP7]], 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[N_VEC:%.*]] = sub i64 [[TMP7]], [[N_MOD_VF]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[VECTOR_BODY4:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[VECTOR_BODY4]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDEX5:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[VECTOR_PH3]] ], [ [[INDEX_NEXT8:%.*]], %[[VECTOR_BODY4]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[VEC_IND6:%.*]] = phi <4 x i64> [ <i64 0, i64 1, i64 2, i64 3>, %[[VECTOR_PH3]] ], [ [[VEC_IND_NEXT7:%.*]], %[[VECTOR_BODY4]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP8:%.*]] = add i64 [[INDEX5]], 0
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP9:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i64, ptr [[P]], i64 [[TMP8]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP10:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i64, ptr [[TMP9]], i32 0
+; CHECK-NEXT: store <4 x i64> [[VEC_IND6]], ptr [[TMP10]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[INDEX_NEXT8]] = add nuw i64 [[INDEX5]], 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[VEC_IND_NEXT7]] = add <4 x i64> [[VEC_IND6]], splat (i64 4)
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP11:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[INDEX_NEXT8]], [[N_VEC]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[TMP11]], label %[[MIDDLE_BLOCK1:.*]], label %[[VECTOR_BODY4]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP4:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK: [[MIDDLE_BLOCK1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP_N:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[TMP7]], [[N_VEC]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP_N]], label %[[EXIT_2:.*]], label %[[SCALAR_PH2]]
+; CHECK: [[SCALAR_PH2]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[BC_RESUME_VAL9:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[N_VEC]], %[[MIDDLE_BLOCK1]] ], [ 0, %[[EXIT_1]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP_2:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP_2]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_2:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[BC_RESUME_VAL9]], %[[SCALAR_PH2]] ], [ [[IV_2_NEXT:%.*]], %[[LOOP_2]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_2_TRUNC:%.*]] = trunc i64 [[IV_2]] to i32
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[IV_2_NEXT]] = add i64 [[IV_2]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[GEP:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i64, ptr [[P]], i64 [[IV_2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i64 [[IV_2]], ptr [[GEP]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ADD_2:%.*]] = add i32 [[ADD_LCSSA]], [[IV_2_TRUNC]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[C_2:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[ADD_2]], 100
+; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[C_2]], label %[[LOOP_2]], label %[[EXIT_2]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP5:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK: [[EXIT_2]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+;
+entry:
+ br label %loop.1
+
+loop.1:
+ %iv.1 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.1.next, %loop.1 ]
+ %1 = load i32, ptr %p, align 4
+ %add.1 = add i32 %1, %iv.1
+ %iv.1.next = add i32 %iv.1, 1
+ %c.1 = icmp eq i32 %iv.1, 100
+ br i1 %c.1, label %exit.1, label %loop.1
+
+exit.1:
+ %add.lcssa = phi i32 [ %add.1, %loop.1 ]
+ br label %loop.2
+
+loop.2:
+ %iv.2 = phi i64 [ 0, %exit.1 ], [ %iv.2.next, %loop.2 ]
+ %iv.2.trunc = trunc i64 %iv.2 to i32
+ %iv.2.next = add i64 %iv.2, 1
+ %gep = getelementptr inbounds i64, ptr %p, i64 %iv.2
+ store i64 %iv.2, ptr %gep
+ %add.2 = add i32 %add.lcssa, %iv.2.trunc
+ %c.2 = icmp slt i32 %add.2, 100
+ br i1 %c.2, label %loop.2, label %exit.2
+
+exit.2:
+ ret void
+}
+
+;.
+; CHECK: [[LOOP0]] = distinct !{[[LOOP0]], [[META1:![0-9]+]], [[META2:![0-9]+]]}
+; CHECK: [[META1]] = !{!"llvm.loop.isvectorized", i32 1}
+; CHECK: [[META2]] = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll.runtime.disable"}
+; CHECK: [[LOOP3]] = distinct !{[[LOOP3]], [[META2]], [[META1]]}
+; CHECK: [[LOOP4]] = distinct !{[[LOOP4]], [[META1]], [[META2]]}
+; CHECK: [[LOOP5]] = distinct !{[[LOOP5]], [[META2]], [[META1]]}
+;.
|
…lvm#119897) `forgetLcssaPhiWithNewPredecessor` performs additional invalidation if there is an existing SCEV for the phi, but earlier `forgetBlockAndLoopDispositions` or `forgetLoop` may already invalidate the SCEV for the phi. Change the order to first call `forgetLcssaPhiWithNewPredecessor` to ensure it runs before its SCEV gets invalidated too eagerly. Fixes llvm#119665. PR: llvm#119897 (cherry picked from commit 3706dfe)
|
@fhahn (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR. |
Backport 3706dfe
Requested by: @fhahn