-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
[HLSL] Change clang Driver Options to not set CXXOperatorNames #126758
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \ | ||
| // RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s \ | ||
| // RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s | ||
|
|
||
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \ | ||
| // RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s \ | ||
| // RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: and | ||
| void and() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: and_eq | ||
| void and_eq() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: bitand | ||
| void bitand() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: bitor | ||
| void bitor() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: compl | ||
| void compl() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: not | ||
| void not() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: not_eq | ||
| void not_eq() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: or | ||
| void or() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: or_eq | ||
| void or_eq() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: xor | ||
| void xor() {} | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK-LABEL: xor_eq | ||
| void xor_eq() {} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems like the wrong place to put this test. We don't need actual codegen here, we just need to make sure it parses.
I'd put this under SemaHLSL and instead use a run line like:
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s -ast-dump | FileCheck %sRestricting test cases to only running the parts of the compiler that are strictly required to verify correctness of a change reduces the time it takes to run the test. While in isolation for a single test that may only be shaving off fractions of a second, in aggregate across the entire test suite it can have a huge impact.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it ok to keep the tests as check-label? Tests are still passing with Label? Or should this change to
// CHECK: FunctionDecl {{.*}} NAME void ()Which is how it seems other tests are setup.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CHECK-LABELdoesn't actually change how the matching is performed (see: https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.html#the-check-label-directive). Notably:Whether you use
CHECKorCHECK-LABELhere doesn't really matter, but the strings you are matching on are too simple, you should be verifying that they areFunctionDecls not just that the stringandappears on a line.