Skip to content

[RISCV] Fix incorrect slide offset when using vnsrl to de-interleave #132123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

[RISCV] Fix incorrect slide offset when using vnsrl to de-interleave #132123

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
d298e8c
[RISCV] Fix incorrect slide offset when using vnsrl to de-interleave
mshockwave Mar 19, 2025
1400fa9
fixup! Use INSERT_SUBVECTOR intead of using many CONCAT_VECTORS
mshockwave Mar 20, 2025
d1146cf
fixup! Address review comments
mshockwave Mar 20, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 14 additions & 4 deletions llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5545,12 +5545,22 @@ static SDValue lowerVECTOR_SHUFFLE(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG,
})) {
// Narrow each source and concatenate them.
// FIXME: For small LMUL it is better to concatenate first.
MVT HalfVT = VT.getHalfNumVectorElementsVT();
MVT EltVT = VT.getVectorElementType();
auto EltCnt = VT.getVectorElementCount();
MVT SubVT =
MVT::getVectorVT(EltVT, EltCnt.divideCoefficientBy(Factor));

SDValue Lo =
getDeinterleaveShiftAndTrunc(DL, HalfVT, V1, Factor, Index, DAG);
getDeinterleaveShiftAndTrunc(DL, SubVT, V1, Factor, Index, DAG);
SDValue Hi =
getDeinterleaveShiftAndTrunc(DL, HalfVT, V2, Factor, Index, DAG);
return DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, DL, VT, Lo, Hi);
getDeinterleaveShiftAndTrunc(DL, SubVT, V2, Factor, Index, DAG);

SDValue Vec = DAG.getUNDEF(VT);
Vec = DAG.getNode(ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR, DL, VT, Vec, Lo,
DAG.getVectorIdxConstant(0, DL));
return DAG.getNode(
ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR, DL, VT, Vec, Hi,
DAG.getVectorIdxConstant(SubVT.getVectorMinNumElements(), DL));
}
}
}
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/fixed-vectors-shuffle-deinterleave.ll
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -378,8 +378,9 @@ define void @deinterleave4_0_i8_two_source(ptr %in0, ptr %in1, ptr %out) {
; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli zero, zero, e8, mf8, ta, ma
; CHECK-NEXT: vnsrl.wi v8, v8, 0
; CHECK-NEXT: vnsrl.wi v9, v9, 0
; CHECK-NEXT: vsetivli zero, 4, e8, mf2, tu, ma
Copy link
Collaborator

@topperc topperc Mar 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be better to CONCAT_VECTORS the Lo and Hi using a 2x type, then widen the rest of the way with INSERT_SUBVECTOR?

Copy link
Member Author

@mshockwave mshockwave Mar 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes it's better (no tu). It's fixed now.

; CHECK-NEXT: vslideup.vi v9, v8, 2
; CHECK-NEXT: vsetivli zero, 8, e8, mf2, ta, ma
; CHECK-NEXT: vslideup.vi v9, v8, 4
; CHECK-NEXT: vse8.v v9, (a2)
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
entry:
Expand All @@ -402,8 +403,9 @@ define void @deinterleave4_8_i8_two_source(ptr %in0, ptr %in1, ptr %out) {
; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli zero, zero, e8, mf8, ta, ma
; CHECK-NEXT: vnsrl.wi v8, v8, 0
; CHECK-NEXT: vnsrl.wi v9, v9, 0
; CHECK-NEXT: vsetivli zero, 4, e8, mf2, tu, ma
; CHECK-NEXT: vslideup.vi v9, v8, 2
; CHECK-NEXT: vsetivli zero, 8, e8, mf2, ta, ma
; CHECK-NEXT: vslideup.vi v9, v8, 4
; CHECK-NEXT: vse8.v v9, (a2)
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
entry:
Expand Down
Loading