[clang] Add comment about misleading alloc_size argument names #134899
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Attr.td names the first alloc_size argument "ElemSizeParam" and the second optional argument "NumElemsParam"; but the semantics of how the two-argument version is used in practice is the opposite of that.
glibc declares calloc() like this, so the second alloc_size argument is the element size:
The Linux kernel declares array allocation functions like
kmalloc_array_noprof()the same way.Add a comment explaining that the names used inside clang are misleading.