-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
[clang][Sema] Fixed Compound Literal is not Constant Expression #143852
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
AaronBallman
merged 3 commits into
llvm:main
from
Mr-Anyone:compound_literal_is_not_constant_expression_fix
Jun 17, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c23 %s | ||
|
|
||
| // Compound literal doesn't need a constant expression inside a initializer-list if it is already inside a function | ||
| // see: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/87867 | ||
| int foo(int *a, int b) { | ||
| return 0; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| int x; | ||
| struct{int t;} a = (struct { | ||
| typeof(foo(&(struct { int t; }){.t = x}.t, 0)) t; // expected-error {{initializer element is not a compile-time constant}} | ||
| }){0}; | ||
|
|
||
| void inside_a_func(){ | ||
| int x; | ||
| (void)(struct { | ||
| typeof(foo(&(struct { int t; }){.t = x}.t, 0)) t; | ||
| }){0}; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // see: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/143613 | ||
| #define bitcast(type, value) \ | ||
| (((union{ typeof(value) src; type dst; }){ (value) }).dst) | ||
|
|
||
| double placeholder = 10.0; | ||
| double bar = bitcast(double, placeholder); // expected-error {{initializer element is not a compile-time constant}} | ||
|
|
||
| int main(void) | ||
| { | ||
| int foo = 4; | ||
| foo = bitcast(int, bitcast(double, foo)); | ||
| return 0; | ||
| } |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
makes it more clear that we're checking whether the given scope is itself somewhere within a function scope.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AaronBallman it feels like it makes sense to sink this into
Scopejust likeisInObjCMethodScope()There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can go either way. This is currently the first time we've needed this, so a static function makes sense. But if we need this a second time, then absolutely agreed it should be hoisted into
Scope. WDYT?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do see people using this from time to time. I just moved this logic into
Scope.