-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
[X86] Truncate i64 add to i32 when upper 33 bits are zeros #144066
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86 Author: Omkar Mohanty (omkar-mohanty) ChangesFixes #142308 . Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144066.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index b4670e270141f..5c999639ba860 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -58086,8 +58086,28 @@ static SDValue combineAdd(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
SDValue Op0 = N->getOperand(0);
SDValue Op1 = N->getOperand(1);
+ unsigned int Opcode = N->getOpcode();
SDLoc DL(N);
+ // Use a 32-bit add+zext if upper 33 bits known zero.
+ if (VT == MVT::i64 && Subtarget.is64Bit()) {
+ APInt HiMask = APInt::getHighBitsSet(64, 33);
+ if (DAG.MaskedValueIsZero(Op0, HiMask) &&
+ DAG.MaskedValueIsZero(Op1, HiMask)) {
+ SDValue LHS = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, MVT::i32, Op0);
+ SDValue RHS = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, MVT::i32, Op1);
+ bool NSW = Op0->getFlags().hasNoSignedWrap();
+ bool NUW = Op0->getFlags().hasNoUnsignedWrap();
+ NSW = NSW & DAG.willNotOverflowAdd(true, LHS, RHS);
+ NUW = NUW & DAG.willNotOverflowAdd(false, LHS, RHS);
+ SDNodeFlags Flags;
+ Flags.setNoUnsignedWrap(NUW);
+ Flags.setNoSignedWrap(NSW);
+ SDValue Sum = DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, MVT::i32, LHS, RHS, Flags);
+ return DAG.getNode(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, DL, MVT::i64, Sum);
+ }
+ }
+
if (SDValue Select = pushAddIntoCmovOfConsts(N, DL, DAG, Subtarget))
return Select;
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/reduce-i64-add.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/reduce-i64-add.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..41de10bd22524
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/reduce-i64-add.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X86
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-linux -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X64-LINUX
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-win32 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X64-WIN32
+
+define i64 @test1(i16 %a) {
+; X86-LABEL: test1:
+; X86: # %bb.0:
+; X86-NEXT: movzwl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
+; X86-NEXT: addl $42, %eax
+; X86-NEXT: xorl %edx, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; X64-LINUX-LABEL: test1:
+; X64-LINUX: # %bb.0:
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: movzwl %di, %eax
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: addl $42, %eax
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: retq
+;
+; X64-WIN32-LABEL: test1:
+; X64-WIN32: # %bb.0:
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: movzwl %cx, %eax
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: addl $42, %eax
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: retq
+ %zext_a = zext i16 %a to i64
+ %sum = add nuw nsw i64 %zext_a, 42
+ ret i64 %sum
+}
+
+
+define i64 @test2(i16 %a, i16 %b) {
+; X86-LABEL: test2:
+; X86: # %bb.0:
+; X86-NEXT: movzwl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; X86-NEXT: movzwl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
+; X86-NEXT: addl %ecx, %eax
+; X86-NEXT: xorl %edx, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; X64-LINUX-LABEL: test2:
+; X64-LINUX: # %bb.0:
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: movzwl %si, %ecx
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: movzwl %di, %eax
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: addl %ecx, %eax
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: retq
+;
+; X64-WIN32-LABEL: test2:
+; X64-WIN32: # %bb.0:
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: movzwl %dx, %edx
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: movzwl %cx, %eax
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: addl %edx, %eax
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: retq
+ %zext_a = zext i16 %a to i64
+ %zext_b = zext i16 %b to i64
+; First 48 bits are all zeros so we can safely truncate to 32 bit additon
+ %sum = add nuw nsw i64 %zext_a, %zext_b
+ ret i64 %sum
+}
+
+define i64 @test3(i16 %a) {
+; X86-LABEL: test3:
+; X86: # %bb.0:
+; X86-NEXT: movzwl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
+; X86-NEXT: addl $42, %eax
+; X86-NEXT: movl $1, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; X64-LINUX-LABEL: test3:
+; X64-LINUX: # %bb.0:
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: movzwl %di, %ecx
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: movabsq $4294967338, %rax # imm = 0x10000002A
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: addq %rcx, %rax
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: retq
+;
+; X64-WIN32-LABEL: test3:
+; X64-WIN32: # %bb.0:
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: movzwl %cx, %ecx
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: movabsq $4294967338, %rax # imm = 0x10000002A
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: addq %rcx, %rax
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: retq
+ %zext_a = zext i16 %a to i64
+; Set the 32nd bit of a to force 64 bit addition, we do not truncate to 32 bit addition in this case
+ %or_a = or i64 %zext_a, 4294967296
+ %sum = add nuw nsw i64 %or_a, 42
+ ret i64 %sum
+}
+
+define i64 @test4(i16 %a, i16 %b) {
+; X86-LABEL: test4:
+; X86: # %bb.0:
+; X86-NEXT: pushl %esi
+; X86-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
+; X86-NEXT: .cfi_offset %esi, -8
+; X86-NEXT: movswl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
+; X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, %esi
+; X86-NEXT: sarl $31, %esi
+; X86-NEXT: movswl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %eax
+; X86-NEXT: movl %eax, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: sarl $31, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: addl %ecx, %eax
+; X86-NEXT: adcl %esi, %edx
+; X86-NEXT: popl %esi
+; X86-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 4
+; X86-NEXT: retl
+;
+; X64-LINUX-LABEL: test4:
+; X64-LINUX: # %bb.0:
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: # kill: def $esi killed $esi def $rsi
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: # kill: def $edi killed $edi def $rdi
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: movswq %di, %rcx
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: movswq %si, %rax
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: addq %rcx, %rax
+; X64-LINUX-NEXT: retq
+;
+; X64-WIN32-LABEL: test4:
+; X64-WIN32: # %bb.0:
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: movswq %cx, %rcx
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: movswq %dx, %rax
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: addq %rcx, %rax
+; X64-WIN32-NEXT: retq
+ %zext_a = sext i16 %a to i64
+ %zext_b = sext i16 %b to i64
+; We don't truncate to 32 bit addition in case of sign extension
+ %sum = add nuw nsw i64 %zext_a, %zext_b
+ ret i64 %sum
+}
|
69b6bf7 to
3182c0d
Compare
3182c0d to
f926a18
Compare
|
Hi @RKSimon , @phoebewang can I get a review on this PR? Thanks :) |
f926a18 to
baf11ed
Compare
phoebewang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with 2 nits.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add nounwind to suppress CFI directives.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review! I added nounwind to all the test cases not completely sure if it’s needed for each one, but did it to keep things consistent.
baf11ed to
91b4591
Compare
| ; X86-NEXT: movl %eax, %edx | ||
| ; X86-NEXT: sarl $31, %edx | ||
| ; X86-NEXT: addl %ecx, %eax | ||
| ; X86-NEXT: adcl %esi, %edx |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Of course :)
|
@omkar-mohanty reverse-ping |
Thanks for pinging. I'll update the PR |
|
@omkar-mohanty reverse-ping |
|
Hi! |
Pulled from the abandoned llvm#144066 patch
…6929) Pulled from the abandoned llvm#144066 patch
|
closing abandoned PR (it can be reopened if necessary) |
Fixes #142308 .