Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 6 additions & 2 deletions clang/docs/UsersManual.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2275,9 +2275,13 @@ are listed below.

.. option:: -fwhole-program-vtables

In LTO mode:
Enable whole-program vtable optimizations, such as single-implementation
devirtualization and virtual constant propagation, for classes with
:doc:`hidden LTO visibility <LTOVisibility>`. Requires ``-flto``.
:doc:`hidden LTO visibility <LTOVisibility>`.
In non-LTO mode:
Enables speculative devirtualization only without other features.
Doesn't require ``-flto`` or visibility.

.. option:: -f[no]split-lto-unit

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -5170,7 +5174,7 @@ Execute ``clang-cl /?`` to see a list of supported options:
-fstandalone-debug Emit full debug info for all types used by the program
-fstrict-aliasing Enable optimizations based on strict aliasing rules
-fsyntax-only Run the preprocessor, parser and semantic analysis stages
-fwhole-program-vtables Enables whole-program vtable optimization. Requires -flto
-fwhole-program-vtables Enables whole-program vtable optimization.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thinking more about this, the option name doesn't really make sense in this case. Perhaps there should be a separate option controlling the non-LTO behavior. Let me think more about this part...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gcc has an option called -fdevirtualize-speculatively, that describes what is being enabled here: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-fdevirtualize-speculatively

How about adding that to clang and using it to enable this instead of -fwhole-program-vtables, which doesn't really make sense as what is being enabled isn't whole program in this case.

-gcodeview-ghash Emit type record hashes in a .debug$H section
-gcodeview Generate CodeView debug information
-gline-directives-only Emit debug line info directives only
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ void EmitAssemblyHelper::RunOptimizationPipeline(
// non-integrated assemblers don't recognize .cgprofile section.
PTO.CallGraphProfile = !CodeGenOpts.DisableIntegratedAS;
PTO.UnifiedLTO = CodeGenOpts.UnifiedLTO;
PTO.WholeProgramDevirt = CodeGenOpts.WholeProgramVTables;

LoopAnalysisManager LAM;
FunctionAnalysisManager FAM;
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion clang/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1359,7 +1359,8 @@ void CodeGenModule::EmitVTableTypeMetadata(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
// Emit type metadata on vtables with LTO or IR instrumentation.
// In IR instrumentation, the type metadata is used to find out vtable
// definitions (for type profiling) among all global variables.
if (!getCodeGenOpts().LTOUnit && !getCodeGenOpts().hasProfileIRInstr())
if (!getCodeGenOpts().LTOUnit && !getCodeGenOpts().hasProfileIRInstr() &&
!getCodeGenOpts().WholeProgramVTables)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this change needed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Teresa, thanks for the review.
Sorry about late reply, I was on holiday.

Without checking WholeProgramVTables, the needed metadata will not be emitted.

return;

CharUnits ComponentWidth = GetTargetTypeStoreSize(getVTableComponentType());
Expand Down
8 changes: 6 additions & 2 deletions clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7847,8 +7847,12 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction &JA,
IsDeviceOffloadAction ? D.getLTOMode() : D.getOffloadLTOMode();
auto OtherIsUsingLTO = OtherLTOMode != LTOK_None;

if ((!IsUsingLTO && !OtherIsUsingLTO) ||
(IsPS4 && !UnifiedLTO && (D.getLTOMode() != LTOK_Full)))
if (!IsUsingLTO && !OtherIsUsingLTO && !UnifiedLTO) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm having trouble following all of the conditions guarding this new if block and the existing one just below. There should probably be one set of guards around the warning, and another around whether -fwhole-program-vtables is propagated (which it also is below here, but only if IsUsingLTO - that should probably just be expanded, rather than adding a new set of conditions for propagating the option).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactored.

if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_O_Group))
if (!A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_O0))
CmdArgs.push_back("-fwhole-program-vtables");
} else if ((!IsUsingLTO && !OtherIsUsingLTO) ||
(IsPS4 && !UnifiedLTO && (D.getLTOMode() != LTOK_Full)))
D.Diag(diag::err_drv_argument_only_allowed_with)
<< "-fwhole-program-vtables"
<< ((IsPS4 && !UnifiedLTO) ? "-flto=full" : "-flto");
Expand Down
56 changes: 56 additions & 0 deletions clang/test/CodeGenCXX/devirt-single-impl.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
// Check that speculative devirtualization works without the need for LTO or visibility.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally we don't test that LLVM optimizations are applied in clang tests. Better to split this into 2 tests:

  • One in clang that checks that the expected type metadata and type tests are inserted (e.g. you might want to modify clang/test/CodeGenCXX/type-metadata.cpp.
  • One in LLVM that consumes IR containing the necessary metadata & type tests, and performs the optimization. E.g. in llvm/test/Transforms/WholeProgramDevirt, using opt with either the necessary set of pass options and/or the non-LTO pass pipeline (ideally try both of these opt invocations).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have separated the tests.
For testing using non-LTO pass pipeline, that will be postponed until I enable the WPD by default.

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fwhole-program-vtables -O1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s

struct A {
A(){}
__attribute__((noinline))
virtual int virtual1(){return 20;}
__attribute__((noinline))
virtual void empty_virtual(){}
};

struct B : A {
B(){}
__attribute__((noinline))
virtual int virtual1() override {return 50;}
__attribute__((noinline))
virtual void empty_virtual() override {}
};

// Test that we can apply speculative devirtualization
// without the need for LTO or visibility.
__attribute__((noinline))
int test_devirtual(A *a) {
// CHECK: %0 = load ptr, ptr %vtable, align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %1 = icmp eq ptr %0, @_ZN1B8virtual1Ev
// CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %1, label %if.true.direct_targ, label %if.false.orig_indirect, !prof !12

// CHECK: if.true.direct_targ: ; preds = %entry
// CHECK-NEXT: %2 = tail call noundef i32 @_ZN1B8virtual1Ev(ptr noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(8) %a)
// CHECK-NEXT: br label %if.end.icp

// CHECK: if.false.orig_indirect: ; preds = %entry
// CHECK-NEXT: %call = tail call noundef i32 %0(ptr noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(8) %a)
// CHECK-NEXT: br label %if.end.icp

// CHECK: if.end.icp: ; preds = %if.false.orig_indirect, %if.true.direct_targ
// CHECK-NEXT: %3 = phi i32 [ %call, %if.false.orig_indirect ], [ %2, %if.true.direct_targ ]
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 %3

return a->virtual1();
}

// Test that we skip devirtualization for empty virtual functions as most probably
// they are used for interfaces.
__attribute__((noinline))
void test_devirtual_empty_fn(A *a) {
// CHECK: load ptr, ptr %vfn, align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: tail call void %0(ptr noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(8) %a)
a->empty_virtual();
}

void test() {
A *a = new B();
test_devirtual(a);
test_devirtual_empty_fn(a);
}
10 changes: 3 additions & 7 deletions clang/test/Driver/whole-program-vtables.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,15 +1,11 @@
// RUN: not %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fwhole-program-vtables -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=NO-LTO %s
// RUN: not %clang_cl --target=x86_64-pc-win32 -fwhole-program-vtables -### -- %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=NO-LTO %s
// NO-LTO: invalid argument '-fwhole-program-vtables' only allowed with '-flto'
// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fwhole-program-vtables -O1 -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=WPD-NO-LTO %s
// RUN: %clang_cl --target=x86_64-pc-win32 -fwhole-program-vtables -O1 -### -- %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=WPD-NO-LTO %s
// WPD-NO-LTO: "-fwhole-program-vtables"

// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fwhole-program-vtables -flto -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=LTO %s
// RUN: not %clang_cl --target=x86_64-pc-win32 -fwhole-program-vtables -flto -### -- %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=LTO %s
// LTO: "-fwhole-program-vtables"

/// -funified-lto does not imply -flto, so we still get an error that fwhole-program-vtables has no effect without -flto
// RUN: not %clang --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -fwhole-program-vtables -funified-lto -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=NO-LTO %s
// RUN: not %clang --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -fwhole-program-vtables -fno-unified-lto -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=NO-LTO %s

// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux -fwhole-program-vtables -fno-whole-program-vtables -flto -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=LTO-DISABLE %s
// RUN: not %clang_cl --target=x86_64-pc-win32 -fwhole-program-vtables -fno-whole-program-vtables -flto -### -- %s 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=LTO-DISABLE %s
// LTO-DISABLE-NOT: "-fwhole-program-vtables"
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions llvm/include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ class PipelineTuningOptions {
// analyses after various module->function or cgscc->function adaptors in the
// default pipelines.
bool EagerlyInvalidateAnalyses;

/// Tuning option to enable/disable whole program devirtualization.
/// Its default value is false.
/// This is controlled by the `-whole-program-vtables` flag.
/// Used only in non-LTO mode.
bool WholeProgramDevirt;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change this to match the proposed new option, and make it independent of LTO. We can presumably use this to do the speculative devirtualization when we are in LTO mode but don't have whole program visibility too.

};

/// This class provides access to building LLVM's passes.
Expand Down
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/WholeProgramDevirt.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -226,11 +226,15 @@ struct WholeProgramDevirtPass : public PassInfoMixin<WholeProgramDevirtPass> {
ModuleSummaryIndex *ExportSummary;
const ModuleSummaryIndex *ImportSummary;
bool UseCommandLine = false;
const bool InLTOMode;
WholeProgramDevirtPass()
: ExportSummary(nullptr), ImportSummary(nullptr), UseCommandLine(true) {}
: ExportSummary(nullptr), ImportSummary(nullptr), UseCommandLine(true),
InLTOMode(true) {}
WholeProgramDevirtPass(ModuleSummaryIndex *ExportSummary,
const ModuleSummaryIndex *ImportSummary)
: ExportSummary(ExportSummary), ImportSummary(ImportSummary) {
const ModuleSummaryIndex *ImportSummary,
bool InLTOMode = true)
: ExportSummary(ExportSummary), ImportSummary(ImportSummary),
InLTOMode(InLTOMode) {
assert(!(ExportSummary && ImportSummary));
}
LLVM_ABI PreservedAnalyses run(Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &);
Expand Down
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ PipelineTuningOptions::PipelineTuningOptions() {
MergeFunctions = EnableMergeFunctions;
InlinerThreshold = -1;
EagerlyInvalidateAnalyses = EnableEagerlyInvalidateAnalyses;
WholeProgramDevirt = false;
}

namespace llvm {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1629,6 +1630,23 @@ PassBuilder::buildModuleOptimizationPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level,
if (!LTOPreLink)
MPM.addPass(RelLookupTableConverterPass());

if (PTO.WholeProgramDevirt && LTOPhase == ThinOrFullLTOPhase::None) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to be guarded by whether whole program vtables was enabled? We don't for LTO. What happens if it is simply always invoked for non-LTO?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Teresa, thanks for looking at the patch.
It's okay to enable it by default. I just added the flag as a first step.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At least WPD and LTT should not do anything if there is no type metadata (the inliner invocation is a separate story, more comments about that below).

Copy link
Member Author

@hassnaaHamdi hassnaaHamdi Jul 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have that check to avoid running passes that are not needed if the option is not enabled, not only the Inliner pass, but also the WPD and LowerTypeTests pass.

MPM.addPass(WholeProgramDevirtPass(/*ExportSummary*/ nullptr,
/*ImportSummary*/ nullptr,
/*InLTOMode=*/false));
MPM.addPass(LowerTypeTestsPass(nullptr, nullptr,
lowertypetests::DropTestKind::Assume));
if (EnableModuleInliner) {
MPM.addPass(ModuleInlinerPass(getInlineParamsFromOptLevel(Level),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think you want to reinvoke the inliner. Better to invoke WPD from the module simplifier right before the inliner is invoked there.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that the passes that eliminate the unused GVs are depending on the inliner where constructors get inlined so it becomes clear which GVs are used and which are not.
And the WPD needs single GV user of the vtable that contains the virtual function we need to devirtualize.
So WPD depends on (GlobalOpt/GlobalDCE) which depend on the inliner.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess in LTO mode we effectively get 2 rounds of inlining too: one during the pre-LTO compile, which must be what is inlining the constructors, and then one in the LTO backends after WPD. This is unfortunately a bigger change, adding another full round of inlining. But I guess ok because this won't be on by default.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you summarize this info in a comment (i.e. specifically why another round of inlining is needed in non-LTO mode but effectively already exists elsewhere in LTO mode)?

UseInlineAdvisor,
ThinOrFullLTOPhase::None));
} else {
MPM.addPass(ModuleInlinerWrapperPass(
getInlineParamsFromOptLevel(Level),
/* MandatoryFirst */ true,
InlineContext{ThinOrFullLTOPhase::None, InlinePass::CGSCCInliner}));
}
}
return MPM;
}

Expand Down
74 changes: 59 additions & 15 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/WholeProgramDevirt.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@
// returns 0, or a single vtable's function returns 1, replace each virtual
// call with a comparison of the vptr against that vtable's address.
//
// This pass is intended to be used during the regular and thin LTO pipelines:
// This pass is intended to be used during the regular/thinLTO and non-LTO
// pipelines:
//
// During regular LTO, the pass determines the best optimization for each
// virtual call and applies the resolutions directly to virtual calls that are
Expand All @@ -48,6 +49,13 @@
// is supported.
// - Import phase: (same as with hybrid case above).
//
// In non-LTO mode:
// - The pass apply speculative devirtualization without requiring any type of
// visibility.
// - Skips other features like virtual constant propagation, uniform return
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's more fundamental in that I don't think some of these can be applied safely without whole program and in fact without some fullLTO. There is vtable rewriting that happens.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

refactored.

// value
// optimization, unique return value optimization, branch funnels to minimize
// the drawbacks of wrong speculation.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

#include "llvm/Transforms/IPO/WholeProgramDevirt.h"
Expand All @@ -60,7 +68,9 @@
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionCache.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ModuleSummaryAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ProfileSummaryInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/TypeMetadataUtils.h"
#include "llvm/Bitcode/BitcodeReader.h"
#include "llvm/Bitcode/BitcodeWriter.h"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -798,6 +808,21 @@ PreservedAnalyses WholeProgramDevirtPass::run(Module &M,
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
return PreservedAnalyses::none();
}
std::optional<ModuleSummaryIndex> Index;
// Force Fallback mode as it's safe in case it's non-LTO mode where
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Under the proposed option, we could do this speculative devirtualization in LTO mode where there is public visibility, but it looks like that would take some additional code restructuring/tracking. For now maybe just guard this by the proposed more general cl::opt, with a TODO to support using the speculative fallback mode just for vtables with public visibility. In fact, non-speculative devirt can kick in for hidden vis classes even in non-LTO mode.

// we don't have hidden visibility.
if (!InLTOMode) {
DevirtCheckMode = WPDCheckMode::Fallback;
// In non-LTO mode, we don't have an ExportSummary, so we
// build the ExportSummary from the module.
assert(!ExportSummary &&
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe just guard the below code by whether we have an ExportSummary?

"ExportSummary is expected to be empty in non-LTO mode");
if (DevirtCheckMode == WPDCheckMode::Fallback && !ExportSummary) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this if check needed? Both conditions should always be true (set or asserted above)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactored.

ProfileSummaryInfo PSI(M);
Index.emplace(buildModuleSummaryIndex(M, nullptr, &PSI));
ExportSummary = Index.has_value() ? &Index.value() : nullptr;
}
}
if (!DevirtModule(M, AARGetter, OREGetter, LookupDomTree, ExportSummary,
ImportSummary)
.run())
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1091,10 +1116,12 @@ bool DevirtModule::tryFindVirtualCallTargets(
if (!TM.Bits->GV->isConstant())
return false;

// We cannot perform whole program devirtualization analysis on a vtable
// with public LTO visibility.
if (TM.Bits->GV->getVCallVisibility() ==
GlobalObject::VCallVisibilityPublic)
// If speculative devirtualization is NOT enabled, it's not safe to perform
// whole program devirtualization
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: fix line wrap

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed.

// analysis on a vtable with public LTO visibility.
if (DevirtCheckMode != WPDCheckMode::Fallback &&
TM.Bits->GV->getVCallVisibility() ==
GlobalObject::VCallVisibilityPublic)
return false;

Function *Fn = nullptr;
Expand All @@ -1112,6 +1139,11 @@ bool DevirtModule::tryFindVirtualCallTargets(
// calls to pure virtuals are UB.
if (Fn->getName() == "__cxa_pure_virtual")
continue;
// In Most cases empty functions will be overridden by the
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: uncapitalize Most

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

// implementation of the derived class, so we can skip them.
if (DevirtCheckMode == WPDCheckMode::Fallback &&
Fn->getReturnType()->isVoidTy() && Fn->getInstructionCount() <= 1)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a performance heuristic? Perhaps these checks should be explicitly checking for !InLTOMode rather than Fallback, which in LTO mode may want different heuristics.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

refactored

continue;

// We can disregard unreachable functions as possible call targets, as
// unreachable functions shouldn't be called.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1333,10 +1365,11 @@ bool DevirtModule::trySingleImplDevirt(
if (!IsExported)
return false;

// If the only implementation has local linkage, we must promote to external
// to make it visible to thin LTO objects. We can only get here during the
// ThinLTO export phase.
if (TheFn->hasLocalLinkage()) {
// In case of non-speculative devirtualization, If the only implementation has
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this going to break LTO if it uses Fallback mode for extra safety? Here too I think !InLTOMode should be checked explicitly.

nits: fix capitalization and spacing in this comment block.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

// local linkage, we must promote to external
// to make it visible to thin LTO objects. We can only get here during the
// ThinLTO export phase.
if (DevirtCheckMode != WPDCheckMode::Fallback && TheFn->hasLocalLinkage()) {
std::string NewName = (TheFn->getName() + ".llvm.merged").str();

// Since we are renaming the function, any comdats with the same name must
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2315,6 +2348,11 @@ bool DevirtModule::run() {

Function *TypeTestFunc =
Intrinsic::getDeclarationIfExists(&M, Intrinsic::type_test);
// If we are applying speculative devirtualization, we can work on the public
// type test intrinsics.
if (!TypeTestFunc && DevirtCheckMode == WPDCheckMode::Fallback)
TypeTestFunc =
Intrinsic::getDeclarationIfExists(&M, Intrinsic::public_type_test);
Function *TypeCheckedLoadFunc =
Intrinsic::getDeclarationIfExists(&M, Intrinsic::type_checked_load);
Function *TypeCheckedLoadRelativeFunc = Intrinsic::getDeclarationIfExists(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2437,12 +2475,18 @@ bool DevirtModule::run() {
.WPDRes[S.first.ByteOffset];
if (tryFindVirtualCallTargets(TargetsForSlot, TypeMemberInfos,
S.first.ByteOffset, ExportSummary)) {

if (!trySingleImplDevirt(ExportSummary, TargetsForSlot, S.second, Res)) {
DidVirtualConstProp |=
tryVirtualConstProp(TargetsForSlot, S.second, Res, S.first);

tryICallBranchFunnel(TargetsForSlot, S.second, Res, S.first);
trySingleImplDevirt(ExportSummary, TargetsForSlot, S.second, Res);
// In Speculative devirt mode, we skip virtual constant propagation
// and branch funneling to minimize the drawback if we got wrong
// speculation during devirtualization.
if (DevirtCheckMode != WPDCheckMode::Fallback) {
if (!trySingleImplDevirt(ExportSummary, TargetsForSlot, S.second,
Res)) {
DidVirtualConstProp |=
tryVirtualConstProp(TargetsForSlot, S.second, Res, S.first);

tryICallBranchFunnel(TargetsForSlot, S.second, Res, S.first);
}
}

// Collect functions devirtualized at least for one call site for stats.
Expand Down
Loading