Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions lldb/include/lldb/DataFormatters/FormattersHelpers.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ void AddFilter(TypeCategoryImpl::SharedPointer category_sp,

std::optional<size_t> ExtractIndexFromString(const char *item_name);

/// Returns \c false if the smart pointer formatters shouldn't continue
/// formatting the rest of the object. Currently this is the case when the
/// pointer is a nullptr.
bool DumpCxxSmartPtrPointerSummary(Stream &stream, ValueObject &ptr,
const TypeSummaryOptions &options);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The return value is a bit awkward. Happy to consider alternatives.

Copy link
Collaborator

@labath labath Jul 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it actually needed though? In my experiments, a normally constructed empty shared pointer will have the __ctrl_ field as null anyway.

I was able to construct a nullptr shared_ptr with a non-empty control field using the subobject constructor (std::shared_ptr<int> si(new int(47)); std::shared_ptr<int> sie(si, nullptr);), but in that case, maybe we actually should show the weak and shared counts?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, don't think the early return is necessary. Let me add that subobject constructor test too

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applied your suggestion (and refactored the weak/strong count logic in the latest commit). Happy to split that up into a separate PR if this is becoming too noisy.


Address GetArrayAddressOrPointerValue(ValueObject &valobj);

time_t GetOSXEpoch();
Expand Down
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions lldb/source/DataFormatters/FormattersHelpers.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -126,3 +126,25 @@ lldb_private::formatters::GetArrayAddressOrPointerValue(ValueObject &valobj) {

return data_addr.address;
}

bool lldb_private::formatters::DumpCxxSmartPtrPointerSummary(
Stream &stream, ValueObject &ptr, const TypeSummaryOptions &options) {
if (ptr.GetValueAsUnsigned(0) == 0) {
stream.Printf("nullptr");
return true;
}

Status error;
ValueObjectSP pointee_sp = ptr.Dereference(error);
// FIXME: should we be handling this as an error?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's reasonable to not print anything in this case.

if (!pointee_sp || !error.Success())
return false;

if (!pointee_sp->DumpPrintableRepresentation(
stream, ValueObject::eValueObjectRepresentationStyleSummary,
lldb::eFormatInvalid,
ValueObject::PrintableRepresentationSpecialCases::eDisable, false))
stream.Printf("ptr = 0x%" PRIx64, ptr.GetValueAsUnsigned(0));

return false;
}
37 changes: 2 additions & 35 deletions lldb/source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibCxx.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -166,24 +166,8 @@ bool lldb_private::formatters::LibcxxSmartPointerSummaryProvider(
if (!ptr_sp)
return false;

if (ptr_sp->GetValueAsUnsigned(0) == 0) {
stream.Printf("nullptr");
if (!DumpCxxSmartPtrPointerSummary(stream, *ptr_sp, options))
return true;
} else {
bool print_pointee = false;
Status error;
ValueObjectSP pointee_sp = ptr_sp->Dereference(error);
if (pointee_sp && error.Success()) {
if (pointee_sp->DumpPrintableRepresentation(
stream, ValueObject::eValueObjectRepresentationStyleSummary,
lldb::eFormatInvalid,
ValueObject::PrintableRepresentationSpecialCases::eDisable,
false))
print_pointee = true;
}
if (!print_pointee)
stream.Printf("ptr = 0x%" PRIx64, ptr_sp->GetValueAsUnsigned(0));
}

if (count_sp)
stream.Printf(" strong=%" PRIu64, 1 + count_sp->GetValueAsUnsigned(0));
Expand All @@ -210,24 +194,7 @@ bool lldb_private::formatters::LibcxxUniquePointerSummaryProvider(
if (!ptr_sp)
return false;

if (ptr_sp->GetValueAsUnsigned(0) == 0) {
stream.Printf("nullptr");
return true;
} else {
bool print_pointee = false;
Status error;
ValueObjectSP pointee_sp = ptr_sp->Dereference(error);
if (pointee_sp && error.Success()) {
if (pointee_sp->DumpPrintableRepresentation(
stream, ValueObject::eValueObjectRepresentationStyleSummary,
lldb::eFormatInvalid,
ValueObject::PrintableRepresentationSpecialCases::eDisable,
false))
print_pointee = true;
}
if (!print_pointee)
stream.Printf("ptr = 0x%" PRIx64, ptr_sp->GetValueAsUnsigned(0));
}
DumpCxxSmartPtrPointerSummary(stream, *ptr_sp, options);

return true;
}
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -156,14 +156,8 @@ bool LibStdcppUniquePtrSyntheticFrontEnd::GetSummary(
if (!m_ptr_obj)
return false;

bool success;
uint64_t ptr_value = m_ptr_obj->GetValueAsUnsigned(0, &success);
if (!success)
return false;
if (ptr_value == 0)
stream.Printf("nullptr");
else
stream.Printf("0x%" PRIx64, ptr_value);
DumpCxxSmartPtrPointerSummary(stream, *m_ptr_obj, options);

return true;
}

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,15 +31,15 @@ def test_with_run_command(self):
self.assertTrue(frame.IsValid())

self.expect("frame variable nup", substrs=["nup = nullptr"])
self.expect("frame variable iup", substrs=["iup = 0x"])
self.expect("frame variable sup", substrs=["sup = 0x"])
self.expect("frame variable iup", substrs=["iup = 123"])
self.expect("frame variable sup", substrs=['sup = "foobar"'])

self.expect("frame variable ndp", substrs=["ndp = nullptr"])
self.expect(
"frame variable idp", substrs=["idp = 0x", "deleter = ", "a = 1", "b = 2"]
"frame variable idp", substrs=["idp = 456", "deleter = ", "a = 1", "b = 2"]
)
self.expect(
"frame variable sdp", substrs=["sdp = 0x", "deleter = ", "a = 3", "b = 4"]
"frame variable sdp", substrs=['sdp = "baz"', "deleter = ", "a = 3", "b = 4"]
)

self.assertEqual(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -106,13 +106,13 @@ def test_recursive_unique_ptr(self):
substrs=["stopped", "stop reason = breakpoint"],
)

self.expect("frame variable f1->fp", substrs=["fp = 0x"])
self.expect("frame variable f1->fp", substrs=["fp = Foo @ 0x"])
self.expect(
"frame variable --ptr-depth=1 f1->fp", substrs=["data = 2", "fp = 0x"]
"frame variable --ptr-depth=1 f1->fp", substrs=["data = 2", "fp = Foo @ 0x"]
)
self.expect(
"frame variable --ptr-depth=2 f1->fp",
substrs=["data = 2", "fp = 0x", "data = 1"],
substrs=["data = 2", "fp = Foo @ 0x", "data = 1"],
)

frame = self.frame()
Expand Down
Loading