-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.1k
[AMDGPU] A SCHED_BARRIER in a bundle should not prevent other SCHED_BARRIERs to be considered #152627
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
yoonseoch
wants to merge
2
commits into
llvm:main
from
yoonseoch:schedbarrier-not-prevented-dueto-another-sb
Closed
[AMDGPU] A SCHED_BARRIER in a bundle should not prevent other SCHED_BARRIERs to be considered #152627
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The basic change LGTM. Though the code structure here is now unnecessarily confusing and could be cleaned up in a follow up. Inside canAddMI already tries to handle isMetaInstruction. The code here is also pre-finding the bounds of the bundle prior to doing the all_of. You can remove the isMetaInstruction inside of canAddMI, and directly check canAddMI in the initial walk through the bundle above
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, will do so.
Initially I did not remove isMetaInstruction inside of canAddMI as that could lead to edges between two sched_barriers, which I thought was unintentional (lines 2501, 2502).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Making canAddMI() return true for a metaInstruction in effect came up with more intrusive changes to existing lit tests. I got about 14 lit-test failures from CodeGen/AMDGPU, mostly on tests of iglp_opts and sched-barrier, and sched-group-barriers.
For example, llvm.amdgcn.sched.group.barrier.ll,
I think using the original logic of canAddMI is safer given that it is used for a non-bundle single MI.
I can still simplify the logic to move the checking into the scanning of the range and avoid doing another scan of all_of.