-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[vscode-lldb] Support lldb-dap environment in debug configuration #153536
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
royitaqi
merged 5 commits into
llvm:main
from
royitaqi:vscode-lldb--support-env-in-debug-config
Aug 28, 2025
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a8b0d3e
[vscode-lldb] Support lldb-dap environment in debug configuration
royitaqi f4678f2
Support array format
royitaqi 840c9fc
Fix build break
royitaqi 0f91d37
Move DAP env validation logic into a separate util function: `validat…
royitaqi 34a9980
Remove validation for keys
royitaqi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
move this to a helper function called
validateEnvor something like that. Otherwise it's very hard to read.Also, that regex is sadly very difficult to read, can you do a simpler check? It doesn't need to be perfect perfect
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will move to a helper function. I see no dedicated source file for util functions, so I'm thinking just put into the same file.
Re. the regex, I actually feel the other way around, that the condition here should be exactly as what's specified in the package.json, so as to avoid user confusion like "why this env is accepted by
launch.json, but not when I use it invscode.debug.startDebugging". Here I assume user experience is more important than development experience (of us). Happy to learn more your thoughts.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@walter-erquinigo I have moved the logic into a util function
validateDAPEnv(). See latest commits(0f91d37, 34a9980).
For the above, I have manually tested that it can catch the following cases:
--
Waiting to learn more about your thoughts regarding the regex (see my prev comment).