-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
[MLIR] Adopt LDBG() debug macro in bufferization (NFC) #154614
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir @llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-bufferization Author: Mehdi Amini (joker-eph) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154614.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Bufferize.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Bufferize.cpp
index 91f6f25e3d096..68ef51992efee 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Bufferize.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Bufferize.cpp
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include "mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.h"
#include "mlir/Interfaces/SideEffectInterfaces.h"
#include "mlir/Pass/PassManager.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/DebugLog.h"
#include <optional>
namespace mlir {
@@ -328,20 +329,16 @@ LogicalResult bufferization::bufferizeOp(Operation *op,
"blocks");
// Bufferize the op.
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << "//===-------------------------------------------===//\n"
- << "IR after bufferizing: " << nextOp->getName() << "\n");
+ LDBG(3) << "//===-------------------------------------------===//\n"
+ << "IR after bufferizing: " << nextOp->getName();
rewriter.setInsertionPoint(nextOp);
if (failed(
bufferizableOp.bufferize(rewriter, options, bufferizationState))) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << "failed to bufferize\n"
- << "//===-------------------------------------------===//\n");
+ LDBG(2) << "failed to bufferize\n"
+ << "//===-------------------------------------------===//";
return nextOp->emitError("failed to bufferize op");
}
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << *op
- << "\n//===-------------------------------------------===//\n");
+ LDBG(3) << *op << "\n//===-------------------------------------------===//";
}
// Return early if the top-level op is entirely gone.
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/OneShotAnalysis.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/OneShotAnalysis.cpp
index a8e8353ca6191..fb7f2bb5f01d8 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/OneShotAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/OneShotAnalysis.cpp
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
#include "mlir/Interfaces/SubsetOpInterface.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/DebugLog.h"
MLIR_DEFINE_EXPLICIT_TYPE_ID(mlir::bufferization::OneShotAnalysisState)
@@ -616,13 +617,10 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
if (getParallelRegion(def.getParentRegion(), options) !=
getParallelRegion(uConflictingWrite->getOwner()->getParentRegion(),
options)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(
- llvm::dbgs()
- << "\n- bufferizes out-of-place due to parallel region:\n");
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << " unConflictingWrite = operand "
- << uConflictingWrite->getOperandNumber() << " of "
- << *uConflictingWrite->getOwner() << "\n");
+ LDBG() << "\n- bufferizes out-of-place due to parallel region:\n"
+ << " unConflictingWrite = operand "
+ << uConflictingWrite->getOperandNumber() << " of "
+ << *uConflictingWrite->getOwner();
return true;
}
}
@@ -631,9 +629,9 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
for (OpOperand *uRead : usesRead) {
Operation *readingOp = uRead->getOwner();
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "\n- check conflict:\n");
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " uRead = operand " << uRead->getOperandNumber()
- << " of " << *readingOp << "\n");
+ LDBG() << "\n- check conflict:\n"
+ << " uRead = operand " << uRead->getOperandNumber() << " of "
+ << *readingOp;
// Find the definition of uRead by following the SSA use-def chain.
// E.g.:
@@ -648,23 +646,22 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
const SetVector<Value> &definitions = state.findDefinitionsCached(uRead);
if (definitions.empty()) {
// Fast path: No conflict if there are no definitions.
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << " no conflict: read value has no definitions\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: read value has no definitions";
continue;
}
// Look for conflicting memory writes. Potential conflicts are writes to an
// alias that have been decided to bufferize inplace.
for (OpOperand *uConflictingWrite : usesWrite) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " unConflictingWrite = operand "
- << uConflictingWrite->getOperandNumber() << " of "
- << *uConflictingWrite->getOwner() << "\n");
+ LDBG() << " unConflictingWrite = operand "
+ << uConflictingWrite->getOperandNumber() << " of "
+ << *uConflictingWrite->getOwner();
// Check if op dominance can be used to rule out read-after-write
// conflicts.
bool useDominance =
canUseOpDominance(uRead, uConflictingWrite, definitions, state);
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "\n- useDominance = " << useDominance << "\n");
+ LDBG() << "\n- useDominance = " << useDominance;
// Throughout this loop, check for multiple requirements that have to be
// met for uConflictingWrite to be an actual conflict.
@@ -680,8 +677,7 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
// inside a loop), there may be no meaningful `happensBefore`
// relationship.
if (happensBefore(readingOp, conflictingWritingOp, domInfo)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << " no conflict: read happens before write\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: read happens before write";
continue;
}
@@ -693,8 +689,7 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
// Note: If the op is executed multiple times (e.g., because it is
// inside a loop), it may be conflicting with itself.
if (uConflictingWrite == uRead) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << " no conflict: read and write are same use\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: read and write are same use";
continue;
}
@@ -705,8 +700,8 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
// multiple times.
if (state.insideMutuallyExclusiveRegions(readingOp,
conflictingWritingOp)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " no conflict: read and write are in "
- "mutually exclusive regions\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: read and write are in "
+ "mutually exclusive regions";
continue;
}
@@ -721,9 +716,7 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
state, uRead, uConflictingWrite->get()) ||
hasEquivalentValueInReverseUseDefChain(
state, uConflictingWrite, uRead->get())) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(
- llvm::dbgs()
- << " no conflict: op bufferizes to element-wise access\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: op bufferizes to element-wise access";
continue;
}
}
@@ -733,15 +726,14 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
// No conflict if the operands are non-conflicting subsets.
if (areNonConflictingSubsets(uRead, uConflictingWrite, state)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " no conflict: non-conflicting subsets\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: non-conflicting subsets";
continue;
}
// No conflict if the op interface says so.
if (auto bufferizableOp = options.dynCastBufferizableOp(readingOp)) {
if (bufferizableOp.isNotConflicting(uRead, uConflictingWrite, state)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << " no conflict: op interace of reading op says 'no'\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: op interace of reading op says 'no'";
continue;
}
}
@@ -751,9 +743,7 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
options.dynCastBufferizableOp(conflictingWritingOp)) {
if (bufferizableOp.isNotConflicting(uRead, uConflictingWrite,
state)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(
- llvm::dbgs()
- << " no conflict: op interace of writing op says 'no'\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: op interace of writing op says 'no'";
continue;
}
}
@@ -761,29 +751,26 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
// Check all possible definitions.
for (Value definition : definitions) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " * definition = " << definition << "\n");
+ LDBG() << " * definition = " << definition;
// No conflict if the conflicting write happens before the definition.
if (Operation *defOp = definition.getDefiningOp()) {
if (happensBefore(conflictingWritingOp, defOp, domInfo)) {
// conflictingWritingOp happens before defOp. No conflict.
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << " no conflict: write happens before definition\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: write happens before definition";
continue;
}
// No conflict if conflictingWritingOp is contained in defOp.
if (defOp->isProperAncestor(conflictingWritingOp)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(
- llvm::dbgs()
- << " no conflict: write is contained in definition\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: write is contained in definition";
continue;
}
} else {
auto bbArg = cast<BlockArgument>(definition);
Block *block = bbArg.getOwner();
if (!block->findAncestorOpInBlock(*conflictingWritingOp)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " no conflict: definition is bbArg "
- "and write happens outside of block\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: definition is bbArg "
+ "and write happens outside of block";
// conflictingWritingOp happens outside of the block. No
// conflict.
continue;
@@ -795,8 +782,7 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
AliasingValueList aliases = state.getAliasingValues(*uConflictingWrite);
if (aliases.getNumAliases() == 1 &&
aliases.getAliases()[0].value == definition) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << " no conflict: definition and write are same\n");
+ LDBG() << " no conflict: definition and write are same";
continue;
}
@@ -804,7 +790,7 @@ hasReadAfterWriteInterference(const DenseSet<OpOperand *> &usesRead,
if (options.printConflicts)
annotateConflict(uRead, uConflictingWrite, definition);
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " => RaW CONFLICT FOUND\n");
+ LDBG() << " => RaW CONFLICT FOUND";
return true;
}
}
@@ -958,7 +944,7 @@ wouldCreateWriteToNonWritableBuffer(OpOperand &operand,
for (AliasingValue alias : state.getAliasingValues(operand))
state.applyOnAliases(alias.value, checkReadOnly);
if (foundReadOnly) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "=> NOT WRITABLE\n");
+ LDBG() << "=> NOT WRITABLE";
return true;
}
@@ -987,10 +973,9 @@ void OneShotAnalysisState::resetCache() {
static LogicalResult
bufferizableInPlaceAnalysisImpl(OpOperand &operand, OneShotAnalysisState &state,
const DominanceInfo &domInfo) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(
- llvm::dbgs() << "//===-------------------------------------------===//\n"
- << "Analyzing operand #" << operand.getOperandNumber()
- << " of " << *operand.getOwner() << "\n");
+ LDBG() << "//===-------------------------------------------===//\n"
+ << "Analyzing operand #" << operand.getOperandNumber() << " of "
+ << *operand.getOwner();
bool foundInterference =
wouldCreateWriteToNonWritableBuffer(operand, state) ||
@@ -1001,8 +986,7 @@ bufferizableInPlaceAnalysisImpl(OpOperand &operand, OneShotAnalysisState &state,
else
state.bufferizeInPlace(operand);
- LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
- << "//===-------------------------------------------===//\n");
+ LDBG() << "//===-------------------------------------------===//";
return success();
}
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
mlir:bufferization
Bufferization infrastructure
mlir
skip-precommit-approval
PR for CI feedback, not intended for review
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.