-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
[flang][OpenMP] move omp end directive validation to semantics #154739
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
| ! RUN: not %flang_fc1 -fsyntax-only -fopenmp %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s | ||
|
|
||
| !$omp parallel | ||
| ! CHECK: error: expected '!$OMP ' | ||
| ! CHECK: error: Expected OpenMP end directive | ||
| end |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ | ||
| ! RUN: %flang_fc1 -fdebug-dump-parse-tree -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=45 %s | FileCheck %s | ||
|
|
||
| ! Check that standalone ORDERED is successfully distinguished form block associated ORDERED | ||
|
|
||
| ! CHECK: | SubroutineStmt | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | | Name = 'standalone' | ||
| subroutine standalone | ||
| integer :: x(10, 10) | ||
| do i = 1, 10 | ||
| do j = 1,10 | ||
| ! CHECK: OpenMPConstruct -> OpenMPStandaloneConstruct | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | OmpDirectiveName -> llvm::omp::Directive = ordered | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | OmpClauseList -> | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | Flags = None | ||
| !$omp ordered | ||
| x(i, j) = i + j | ||
| end do | ||
| end do | ||
| endsubroutine | ||
|
|
||
| ! CHECK: | SubroutineStmt | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | | Name = 'strict_block' | ||
| subroutine strict_block | ||
| integer :: x(10, 10) | ||
| integer :: tmp | ||
| do i = 1, 10 | ||
| do j = 1,10 | ||
| ! CHECK: OpenMPConstruct -> OpenMPBlockConstruct | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | OmpBeginDirective | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | | OmpDirectiveName -> llvm::omp::Directive = ordered | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | | OmpClauseList -> | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | | Flags = None | ||
| !$omp ordered | ||
| block | ||
| tmp = i + j | ||
| x(i, j) = tmp | ||
| end block | ||
| end do | ||
| end do | ||
| endsubroutine | ||
|
|
||
| ! CHECK: | SubroutineStmt | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | | Name = 'loose_block' | ||
| subroutine loose_block | ||
| integer :: x(10, 10) | ||
| integer :: tmp | ||
| do i = 1, 10 | ||
| do j = 1,10 | ||
| ! CHECK: OpenMPConstruct -> OpenMPBlockConstruct | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | OmpBeginDirective | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | | OmpDirectiveName -> llvm::omp::Directive = ordered | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | | OmpClauseList -> | ||
| ! CHECK-NEXT: | | Flags = None | ||
| !$omp ordered | ||
| tmp = i + j | ||
| x(i, j) = tmp | ||
| !$omp end ordered | ||
| end do | ||
| end do | ||
| endsubroutine |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
| ! RUN: %python %S/../test_errors.py %s %flang -fopenmp | ||
|
|
||
| ! Test that we can diagnose missing end directives without an explosion of errors | ||
|
|
||
| ! ERROR: Expected OpenMP end directive | ||
| !$omp parallel | ||
| ! ERROR: Expected OpenMP end directive | ||
| !$omp task | ||
| ! ERROR: Expected OpenMP end directive | ||
| !$omp parallel | ||
| ! ERROR: Expected OpenMP end directive | ||
| !$omp task | ||
| end |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need a flag for this? All loosely-structured blocks need the end-directive, and it's easy to tell whether a block is strictly- or loosely-structured (single BLOCK vs. sequence that doesn't start with BLOCK). I think we could simply have an optional end-directive in this case as well without the flag, and check the type of block in semantics.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the quick review. Good idea.