-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.1k
Add documentation on debugging LLVM. #156128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ | ||
| ============== | ||
| Debugging LLVM | ||
| ============== | ||
|
|
||
| This document is a collection of tips and tricks for debugging LLVM | ||
| using a source-level debugger. The assumption is that you are trying to | ||
| figure out the root cause of a miscompilation in the program that you | ||
| are compiling. | ||
|
|
||
| Extract and rerun the compile command | ||
| ===================================== | ||
|
|
||
| Extract the Clang command that produces the buggy code. The way to do | ||
| this depends on the build system used by your program. | ||
|
|
||
| - For Ninja-based build systems, you can pass ``-t commands`` to Ninja | ||
| and filter the output by the targeted source file name. For example: | ||
| ``ninja -t commands myprogram | grep path/to/file.cpp``. | ||
|
|
||
| - For Bazel-based build systems using Bazel 9 or newer (not released yet | ||
| as of this writing), you can pass ``--output=commands`` to the ``bazel | ||
| aquery`` subcommand for a similar result. For example: ``bazel aquery | ||
| --output=commands 'deps(//myprogram)' | grep path/to/file.cpp``. Build | ||
| commands must generally be run from a subdirectory of the source | ||
| directory named ``bazel-$PROJECTNAME``. Bazel typically makes the target | ||
| paths of ``-o`` and ``-MF`` read-only when running commands outside | ||
| of a build, so it may be necessary to change or remove these flags. | ||
|
|
||
| - A method that should work with any build system is to build your program | ||
| under `Bear <https://github.com/rizsotto/Bear>`_ and look for the | ||
| compile command in the resulting ``compile_commands.json`` file. | ||
|
|
||
| Once you have the command you can use the following steps to debug | ||
| it. Note that any flags mentioned later in this document are LLVM flags | ||
| so they must be prefixed with ``-mllvm`` when passed to the Clang driver, | ||
| e.g. ``-mllvm -print-after-all``. | ||
|
|
||
| Understanding the source of the issue | ||
| ===================================== | ||
|
|
||
| If you have a miscompilation introduced by a pass, it is frequently | ||
| possible to identify the pass where things go wrong by searching a | ||
| pass-by-pass printout, which is enabled using the ``-print-after-all`` | ||
| flag. Pipe stderr into ``less`` (append ``2>&1 | less`` to command | ||
| line) and use text search to move between passes (e.g. type ``/Dump | ||
| After<Enter>``, ``n`` to move to next pass, ``N`` to move to previous | ||
| pass). If the name of the function containing the buggy IR is known, you | ||
| can filter the output by passing ``-filter-print-funcs=functionname``. You | ||
| can sometimes pass ``-debug`` to get useful details about what passes | ||
| are doing. | ||
|
|
||
| Creating a debug build of LLVM | ||
| ============================== | ||
|
|
||
| The subsequent debugging steps require a debug build of LLVM. Pass the | ||
| ``-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug`` to CMake in a separate build tree to create | ||
| a debug build. | ||
|
|
||
| Understanding where an instruction came from | ||
| ============================================ | ||
|
|
||
| A common debugging task involves understanding which part of the code | ||
| introduced a buggy instruction. The pass-by-pass dump is sometimes enough, | ||
| but for complex or unfamiliar passes, more information is often required. | ||
|
|
||
| The first step is to record a run of the debug build of Clang under `rr | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Depending on what you need, There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, but you can't usually tell ahead of time that you're not going to hit an At some point I want other build systems to get something like Bazel's |
||
| <https://rr-project.org>`_ passing the LLVM flag ``-print-inst-addrs`` | ||
| together with ``-print-after-all`` and any desired filters. This will | ||
| cause each instruction printed by LLVM to be suffixed with a comment | ||
| showing the address of the ``Instruction`` object. You can then replay | ||
| the run of Clang with ``rr replay``. Because ``rr`` is deterministic, | ||
| the instruction will receive the same address during the replay, so | ||
| you can break on the instruction's construction using a conditional | ||
| breakpoint that checks for the address printed by LLVM, with commands | ||
| such as the following: | ||
|
|
||
| .. code-block:: text | ||
|
|
||
| b Instruction::Instruction | ||
|
||
| cond 1 this == 0x12345678 | ||
|
|
||
| When the breakpoint is hit, you will likely be at the location where | ||
| the instruction was created, so you can unwind the stack with ``bt`` | ||
| to see the stack trace. It is also possible that an instruction was | ||
| created multiple times at the same address, so you may need to continue | ||
| until reaching the desired location, but in the author's experience this | ||
| is unlikely to occur. | ||
|
|
||
| Identifying the source locations of instructions | ||
| ================================================ | ||
|
|
||
| To identify the source location that caused a particular instruction | ||
| to be created, you can pass the LLVM flag ``-print-inst-debug-locs`` | ||
| and each instruction printed by LLVM is suffixed with the file and line | ||
| number of the instruction according to the debug information. Note that | ||
| this requires debug information to be enabled (e.g. pass ``-g`` to Clang). | ||
|
|
||
| GDB pretty printers | ||
| =================== | ||
|
|
||
| A handful of `GDB pretty printers | ||
| <https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Pretty-Printing.html>`__ are | ||
| provided for some of the core LLVM libraries. To use them, execute the | ||
| following (or add it to your ``~/.gdbinit``):: | ||
|
|
||
| source /path/to/llvm/src/utils/gdb-scripts/prettyprinters.py | ||
|
|
||
| It also might be handy to enable the `print pretty | ||
| <http://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/gdb/html_node/gdb_57.html>`__ option to | ||
|
||
| avoid data structures being printed as a big block of text. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mention
-print-changed(and maybe-print-module-scope)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added a link to PrintPasses.cpp for the list of options. I think the options I mentioned are the most important ones.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fwiw I would say -print-changed is more useful than -print-after-all (kind of the same but more compressed output).