[SCEV] Don't perform implication checks with many predicates #158652
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When adding a new predicate to a union, we currently do a bidirectional implication for all the contained predicates. This means that the number of implication checks is quadratic in the number of total predicates (if they don't end up being eliminated).
Fix this by not checking for implication if the number of predicates grows too large. The expectation is that if there is a large number of predicates, we should be discarding them later anyway, as expanding them would be too expensive.
(Alternatively we could also try to prevent the addition of many predicates in the first place, but I figured this is better as it's centralized in one place.)
Fixes #156114.