-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[DA] Add initial support for monotonicity check #162280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kasuga-fj
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
users/kasuga-fj/da-monotonic-check-0
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,133
−3
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -128,6 +128,18 @@ static cl::opt<bool> RunSIVRoutinesOnly( | |
"The purpose is mainly to exclude the influence of those routines " | ||
"in regression tests for SIV routines.")); | ||
|
||
// TODO: This flag is disabled by default because it is still under development. | ||
// Enable it or delete this flag when the feature is ready. | ||
static cl::opt<bool> EnableMonotonicityCheck( | ||
"da-enable-monotonicity-check", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden, | ||
cl::desc("Check if the subscripts are monotonic. If it's not, dependence " | ||
"is reported as unknown.")); | ||
|
||
static cl::opt<bool> DumpMonotonicityReport( | ||
"da-dump-monotonicity-report", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden, | ||
cl::desc( | ||
"When printing analysis, dump the results of monotonicity checks.")); | ||
|
||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | ||
// basics | ||
|
||
|
@@ -177,13 +189,189 @@ void DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { | |
AU.addRequiredTransitive<LoopInfoWrapperPass>(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
namespace { | ||
|
||
/// The type of monotonicity of a SCEV. This property is defined with respect to | ||
/// the outermost loop that DA is analyzing. | ||
/// | ||
/// This is designed to classify the behavior of AddRec expressions, and does | ||
/// not care about other SCEVs. For example, given the two loop-invariant values | ||
/// `A` and `B`, `A + B` is treated as Invariant even if the addition wraps. | ||
enum class SCEVMonotonicityType { | ||
/// The expression is neither loop-invariant nor monotonic (or we fail to | ||
/// prove it). | ||
Unknown, | ||
|
||
/// The expression is loop-invariant with respect to the outermost loop. | ||
Invariant, | ||
|
||
/// The expression is a (nested) affine AddRec and is monotonically increasing | ||
/// or decreasing in a signed sense with respect to each loop. Monotonicity is | ||
/// checked independently for each loop, and the expression is classified as | ||
/// MultiSignedMonotonic if all AddRecs are nsw. For example, in the following | ||
/// loop: | ||
/// | ||
/// for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) | ||
/// for (j = 0; j < 100; j++) | ||
/// A[i + j] = ...; | ||
/// | ||
/// The SCEV for `i + j` is classified as MultiSignedMonotonic. On the other | ||
/// hand, in the following loop: | ||
/// | ||
/// for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) | ||
/// for (j = 0; j <= (1ULL << 63); j++) | ||
/// A[i + j] = ...; | ||
/// | ||
/// The SCEV for `i + j` is NOT classified as MultiMonotonic, because the | ||
/// AddRec for `j` wraps in a signed sense. We don't consider the "direction" | ||
/// of each AddRec. For example, in the following loop: | ||
/// | ||
/// for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) | ||
/// for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++) | ||
/// A[i - j] = ...; | ||
/// | ||
/// The SCEV for `i - j` is classified as MultiSignedMonotonic, even though it | ||
/// contains both increasing and decreasing AddRecs. | ||
/// | ||
/// Note that we don't check if the step recurrence can be zero. For | ||
/// example,an AddRec `{0,+,%a}<nsw> is classifed as Monotonic if `%a` can be | ||
/// zero. That is, the expression can be Invariant. | ||
MultiSignedMonotonic, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
struct SCEVMonotonicity { | ||
SCEVMonotonicity(SCEVMonotonicityType Type, | ||
const SCEV *FailurePoint = nullptr); | ||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicityType getType() const { return Type; } | ||
|
||
const SCEV *getFailurePoint() const { return FailurePoint; } | ||
|
||
bool isUnknown() const { return Type == SCEVMonotonicityType::Unknown; } | ||
|
||
void print(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned Depth) const; | ||
|
||
private: | ||
SCEVMonotonicityType Type; | ||
|
||
/// The subexpression that caused Unknown. Mainly for debugging purpose. | ||
const SCEV *FailurePoint; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
struct SCEVMonotonicityChecker | ||
: public SCEVVisitor<SCEVMonotonicityChecker, SCEVMonotonicity> { | ||
Comment on lines
+261
to
+262
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. As for the testability, maybe is it better to split the file, like ScalarEvolutionDivision.cpp? Or would it be better to avoid creating separate files unnecessarily? |
||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicityChecker(ScalarEvolution *SE) : SE(SE) {} | ||
|
||
/// Check the monotonicity of \p Expr. \p Expr must be integer type. If \p | ||
/// OutermostLoop is not null, \p Expr must be defined in \p OutermostLoop or | ||
/// one of its nested loops. | ||
SCEVMonotonicity checkMonotonicity(const SCEV *Expr, | ||
const Loop *OutermostLoop); | ||
|
||
private: | ||
ScalarEvolution *SE; | ||
|
||
/// The outermost loop that DA is analyzing. | ||
const Loop *OutermostLoop; | ||
|
||
/// A helper to classify \p Expr as either Invariant or Unknown. | ||
SCEVMonotonicity invariantOrUnknown(const SCEV *Expr); | ||
|
||
/// Return true if \p Expr is loop-invariant with respect to the outermost | ||
/// loop. | ||
bool isLoopInvariant(const SCEV *Expr) const; | ||
|
||
/// A helper to create an Unknown SCEVMonotonicity. | ||
SCEVMonotonicity createUnknown(const SCEV *FailurePoint) { | ||
return SCEVMonotonicity(SCEVMonotonicityType::Unknown, FailurePoint); | ||
} | ||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicity visitAddRecExpr(const SCEVAddRecExpr *Expr); | ||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicity visitConstant(const SCEVConstant *) { | ||
return SCEVMonotonicity(SCEVMonotonicityType::Invariant); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitVScale(const SCEVVScale *) { | ||
return SCEVMonotonicity(SCEVMonotonicityType::Invariant); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// TODO: Handle more cases. | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitZeroExtendExpr(const SCEVZeroExtendExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitSignExtendExpr(const SCEVSignExtendExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitAddExpr(const SCEVAddExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitMulExpr(const SCEVMulExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitPtrToIntExpr(const SCEVPtrToIntExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitTruncateExpr(const SCEVTruncateExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitUDivExpr(const SCEVUDivExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitSMaxExpr(const SCEVSMaxExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitUMaxExpr(const SCEVUMaxExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitSMinExpr(const SCEVSMinExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitUMinExpr(const SCEVUMinExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitSequentialUMinExpr(const SCEVSequentialUMinExpr *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitUnknown(const SCEVUnknown *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
SCEVMonotonicity visitCouldNotCompute(const SCEVCouldNotCompute *Expr) { | ||
return invariantOrUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
|
||
friend struct SCEVVisitor<SCEVMonotonicityChecker, SCEVMonotonicity>; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
} // anonymous namespace | ||
|
||
// Used to test the dependence analyzer. | ||
// Looks through the function, noting instructions that may access memory. | ||
// Calls depends() on every possible pair and prints out the result. | ||
// Ignores all other instructions. | ||
static void dumpExampleDependence(raw_ostream &OS, DependenceInfo *DA, | ||
ScalarEvolution &SE, bool NormalizeResults) { | ||
ScalarEvolution &SE, LoopInfo &LI, | ||
bool NormalizeResults) { | ||
auto *F = DA->getFunction(); | ||
|
||
if (DumpMonotonicityReport) { | ||
SCEVMonotonicityChecker Checker(&SE); | ||
OS << "Monotonicity check:\n"; | ||
for (Instruction &Inst : instructions(F)) { | ||
if (!isa<LoadInst>(Inst) && !isa<StoreInst>(Inst)) | ||
continue; | ||
Value *Ptr = getLoadStorePointerOperand(&Inst); | ||
const Loop *L = LI.getLoopFor(Inst.getParent()); | ||
const SCEV *PtrSCEV = SE.getSCEVAtScope(Ptr, L); | ||
const SCEV *AccessFn = SE.removePointerBase(PtrSCEV); | ||
SCEVMonotonicity Mon = Checker.checkMonotonicity(AccessFn, L); | ||
OS.indent(2) << "Inst: " << Inst << "\n"; | ||
OS.indent(4) << "Expr: " << *AccessFn << "\n"; | ||
Mon.print(OS, 4); | ||
} | ||
OS << "\n"; | ||
} | ||
|
||
for (inst_iterator SrcI = inst_begin(F), SrcE = inst_end(F); SrcI != SrcE; | ||
++SrcI) { | ||
if (SrcI->mayReadOrWriteMemory()) { | ||
|
@@ -235,7 +423,8 @@ static void dumpExampleDependence(raw_ostream &OS, DependenceInfo *DA, | |
void DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass::print(raw_ostream &OS, | ||
const Module *) const { | ||
dumpExampleDependence( | ||
OS, info.get(), getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE(), false); | ||
OS, info.get(), getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE(), | ||
getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo(), false); | ||
} | ||
|
||
PreservedAnalyses | ||
|
@@ -244,7 +433,7 @@ DependenceAnalysisPrinterPass::run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &FAM) { | |
<< "':\n"; | ||
dumpExampleDependence(OS, &FAM.getResult<DependenceAnalysis>(F), | ||
FAM.getResult<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>(F), | ||
NormalizeResults); | ||
FAM.getResult<LoopAnalysis>(F), NormalizeResults); | ||
return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -670,6 +859,70 @@ bool DependenceInfo::intersectConstraints(Constraint *X, const Constraint *Y) { | |
return false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | ||
// SCEVMonotonicity | ||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicity::SCEVMonotonicity(SCEVMonotonicityType Type, | ||
const SCEV *FailurePoint) | ||
: Type(Type), FailurePoint(FailurePoint) { | ||
assert( | ||
((Type == SCEVMonotonicityType::Unknown) == (FailurePoint != nullptr)) && | ||
"FailurePoint must be provided iff Type is Unknown"); | ||
} | ||
|
||
void SCEVMonotonicity::print(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned Depth) const { | ||
OS.indent(Depth) << "Monotonicity: "; | ||
switch (Type) { | ||
case SCEVMonotonicityType::Unknown: | ||
assert(FailurePoint && "FailurePoint must be provided for Unknown"); | ||
OS << "Unknown\n"; | ||
OS.indent(Depth) << "Reason: " << *FailurePoint << "\n"; | ||
break; | ||
case SCEVMonotonicityType::Invariant: | ||
OS << "Invariant\n"; | ||
break; | ||
case SCEVMonotonicityType::MultiSignedMonotonic: | ||
OS << "MultiSignedMonotonic\n"; | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
bool SCEVMonotonicityChecker::isLoopInvariant(const SCEV *Expr) const { | ||
return !OutermostLoop || SE->isLoopInvariant(Expr, OutermostLoop); | ||
} | ||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicity SCEVMonotonicityChecker::invariantOrUnknown(const SCEV *Expr) { | ||
if (isLoopInvariant(Expr)) | ||
return SCEVMonotonicity(SCEVMonotonicityType::Invariant); | ||
return createUnknown(Expr); | ||
} | ||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicity | ||
SCEVMonotonicityChecker::checkMonotonicity(const SCEV *Expr, | ||
const Loop *OutermostLoop) { | ||
assert(Expr->getType()->isIntegerTy() && "Expr must be integer type"); | ||
this->OutermostLoop = OutermostLoop; | ||
return visit(Expr); | ||
} | ||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicity | ||
SCEVMonotonicityChecker::visitAddRecExpr(const SCEVAddRecExpr *Expr) { | ||
if (!Expr->isAffine() || !Expr->hasNoSignedWrap()) | ||
return createUnknown(Expr); | ||
|
||
const SCEV *Start = Expr->getStart(); | ||
const SCEV *Step = Expr->getStepRecurrence(*SE); | ||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicity StartMon = visit(Start); | ||
if (StartMon.isUnknown()) | ||
return StartMon; | ||
|
||
if (!isLoopInvariant(Step)) | ||
return createUnknown(Expr); | ||
|
||
return SCEVMonotonicity(SCEVMonotonicityType::MultiSignedMonotonic); | ||
} | ||
|
||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | ||
// DependenceInfo methods | ||
|
||
|
@@ -3479,10 +3732,19 @@ bool DependenceInfo::tryDelinearize(Instruction *Src, Instruction *Dst, | |
// resize Pair to contain as many pairs of subscripts as the delinearization | ||
// has found, and then initialize the pairs following the delinearization. | ||
Pair.resize(Size); | ||
SCEVMonotonicityChecker MonChecker(SE); | ||
const Loop *OutermostLoop = SrcLoop ? SrcLoop->getOutermostLoop() : nullptr; | ||
for (int I = 0; I < Size; ++I) { | ||
Pair[I].Src = SrcSubscripts[I]; | ||
Pair[I].Dst = DstSubscripts[I]; | ||
unifySubscriptType(&Pair[I]); | ||
|
||
if (EnableMonotonicityCheck) { | ||
if (MonChecker.checkMonotonicity(Pair[I].Src, OutermostLoop).isUnknown()) | ||
return false; | ||
if (MonChecker.checkMonotonicity(Pair[I].Dst, OutermostLoop).isUnknown()) | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
return true; | ||
|
@@ -3815,6 +4077,14 @@ DependenceInfo::depends(Instruction *Src, Instruction *Dst, | |
Pair[0].Src = SrcEv; | ||
Pair[0].Dst = DstEv; | ||
|
||
SCEVMonotonicityChecker MonChecker(SE); | ||
const Loop *OutermostLoop = SrcLoop ? SrcLoop->getOutermostLoop() : nullptr; | ||
if (EnableMonotonicityCheck) | ||
if (MonChecker.checkMonotonicity(Pair[0].Src, OutermostLoop).isUnknown() || | ||
MonChecker.checkMonotonicity(Pair[0].Dst, OutermostLoop).isUnknown()) | ||
return std::make_unique<Dependence>(Src, Dst, | ||
SCEVUnionPredicate(Assume, *SE)); | ||
|
||
if (Delinearize) { | ||
if (tryDelinearize(Src, Dst, Pair)) { | ||
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " delinearized\n"); | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this name is not good. Please let me know if you have a better one. (it would be better if the name also imply that the step value is loop invariant.)