-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.1k
[flang] More careful handling of PROCEDURE() components #165468
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -9456,13 +9456,35 @@ bool ResolveNamesVisitor::SetProcFlag( | |
| SayWithDecl(name, symbol, | ||
| "Implicit declaration of function '%s' has a different result type than in previous declaration"_err_en_US); | ||
| return false; | ||
| } else if (symbol.has<ProcEntityDetails>()) { | ||
| symbol.set(flag); // in case it hasn't been set yet | ||
| if (flag == Symbol::Flag::Function) { | ||
| ApplyImplicitRules(symbol); | ||
| } | ||
| if (symbol.attrs().test(Attr::INTRINSIC)) { | ||
| AcquireIntrinsicProcedureFlags(symbol); | ||
| } else if (const auto *procDetails{symbol.detailsIf<ProcEntityDetails>()}) { | ||
| if (symbol.owner().IsDerivedType()) { // procedure pointer component | ||
| bool isFunction{IsFunction(symbol)}; | ||
| const Symbol *explicitInterface{procDetails->procInterface()}; | ||
| if (flag == Symbol::Flag::Function) { | ||
| if (!isFunction) { | ||
| SayWithDecl(name, symbol, | ||
| "Procedure pointer component '%s' was not declared to be a function"_err_en_US); | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (isFunction || | ||
| (!explicitInterface && | ||
| !context().IsEnabled( | ||
| common::LanguageFeature::CallImplicitProcComponent))) { | ||
| SayWithDecl(name, symbol, | ||
| "Procedure pointer component '%s' was not declared to be a subroutine"_err_en_US); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm confused by this. Here So if it's perhaps function with implicit interface, why is the error message "was not declared to be a subroutine"? BTW, this error does not seem to be covered by the LIT test... |
||
| } else if (!explicitInterface && | ||
| context().ShouldWarn( | ||
| common::LanguageFeature::CallImplicitProcComponent)) { | ||
| SayWithDecl(name, symbol, | ||
| "Procedure pointer component '%s' should have been declared to be a subroutine"_warn_en_US); | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| symbol.set(flag); // in case it hasn't been set yet | ||
| if (flag == Symbol::Flag::Function) { | ||
| ApplyImplicitRules(symbol); | ||
| } | ||
| if (symbol.attrs().test(Attr::INTRINSIC)) { | ||
| AcquireIntrinsicProcedureFlags(symbol); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (symbol.GetType() && flag == Symbol::Flag::Subroutine) { | ||
| SayWithDecl( | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is "it" here? Is this Flang or the Standard? I scanned back a few paragraphs and the owner of the pronoun wasn't obvious.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, on rereading, this could only mean "the keyword Procedure" or something similar. Might want to make the first occurrence explicit.