Skip to content

[mlir] Use LDBG to replace LLVM_DEBUG in IntegerRelation.cpp (NFC) #166772

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
linuxlonelyeagle merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2025
Merged

[mlir] Use LDBG to replace LLVM_DEBUG in IntegerRelation.cpp (NFC) #166772

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 7 additions & 7 deletions mlir/lib/Analysis/Presburger/IntegerRelation.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include "llvm/ADT/Sequence.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallBitVector.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/DebugLog.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -716,7 +717,7 @@ bool IntegerRelation::isEmpty() const {
// that aren't the intended use case for IntegerRelation. This is
// needed since FM has a worst case exponential complexity in theory.
if (tmpCst.getNumConstraints() >= kExplosionFactor * getNumVars()) {
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "FM constraint explosion detected\n");
LDBG() << "FM constraint explosion detected";
return false;
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1943,7 +1944,7 @@ void IntegerRelation::removeTrivialRedundancy() {
// which can prove the existence of a solution if there is one.
void IntegerRelation::fourierMotzkinEliminate(unsigned pos, bool darkShadow,
bool *isResultIntegerExact) {
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "FM input (eliminate pos " << pos << "):\n");
LDBG() << "FM input (eliminate pos " << pos << "):";
LLVM_DEBUG(dump());
assert(pos < getNumVars() && "invalid position");
assert(hasConsistentState());
Expand All @@ -1955,7 +1956,7 @@ void IntegerRelation::fourierMotzkinEliminate(unsigned pos, bool darkShadow,
LogicalResult ret = gaussianEliminateVar(pos);
(void)ret;
assert(ret.succeeded() && "Gaussian elimination guaranteed to succeed");
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "FM output (through Gaussian elimination):\n");
LDBG() << "FM output (through Gaussian elimination):";
LLVM_DEBUG(dump());
return;
}
Expand All @@ -1969,7 +1970,7 @@ void IntegerRelation::fourierMotzkinEliminate(unsigned pos, bool darkShadow,
// If it doesn't appear, just remove the column and return.
// TODO: refactor removeColumns to use it from here.
removeVar(pos);
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "FM output:\n");
LDBG() << "FM output:";
LLVM_DEBUG(dump());
return;
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2052,8 +2053,7 @@ void IntegerRelation::fourierMotzkinEliminate(unsigned pos, bool darkShadow,
}
}

LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "FM isResultIntegerExact: " << allLCMsAreOne
<< "\n");
LDBG() << "FM isResultIntegerExact: " << allLCMsAreOne;
if (allLCMsAreOne && isResultIntegerExact)
*isResultIntegerExact = true;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2090,7 +2090,7 @@ void IntegerRelation::fourierMotzkinEliminate(unsigned pos, bool darkShadow,
newRel.normalizeConstraintsByGCD();
newRel.removeTrivialRedundancy();
clearAndCopyFrom(newRel);
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "FM output:\n");
LDBG() << "FM output:";
LLVM_DEBUG(dump());
}

Expand Down