Skip to content

[X86] Sync multiversion features with libgcc and refactor internal feature tables #168750

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
mikolaj-pirog merged 14 commits into from
Nov 27, 2025
Merged

[X86] Sync multiversion features with libgcc and refactor internal feature tables #168750

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
b990337
Sync multiversion features with libgcc and refactor internal tables
mikolaj-pirog Nov 19, 2025
ad7108b
Formatting
mikolaj-pirog Nov 19, 2025
2683f8f
Reviewer suggestions
mikolaj-pirog Nov 20, 2025
652dca4
Fix
mikolaj-pirog Nov 20, 2025
f9b584f
Fix
mikolaj-pirog Nov 20, 2025
83aa05b
Reviewer suggestions
mikolaj-pirog Nov 20, 2025
3a7e98d
Reviewer suggestions
mikolaj-pirog Nov 21, 2025
800b55e
formatting
mikolaj-pirog Nov 21, 2025
bf783a2
Reviewer suggestions
mikolaj-pirog Nov 21, 2025
a9a59ed
Merge remote-tracking branch 'other/main' into mpirog/refactor-featur…
mikolaj-pirog Nov 24, 2025
e67d4f7
Move FEATUREs from FEATURE_COMPATs
mikolaj-pirog Nov 25, 2025
df08e46
Format
mikolaj-pirog Nov 25, 2025
b1b1be1
Reviewer suggestions
mikolaj-pirog Nov 25, 2025
b26ff0f
Multiversion on x86-64
mikolaj-pirog Nov 27, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1302,15 +1302,15 @@ bool X86TargetInfo::hasFeature(StringRef Feature) const {
// X86TargetInfo::hasFeature for a somewhat comprehensive list).
bool X86TargetInfo::validateCpuSupports(StringRef FeatureStr) const {
return llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(FeatureStr)
#define X86_FEATURE_COMPAT(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY) .Case(STR, true)
#define X86_MICROARCH_LEVEL(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY) .Case(STR, true)
#define X86_FEATURE_COMPAT(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY, ABI_VALUE) .Case(STR, true)
#define X86_MICROARCH_LEVEL(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY, ABI_VALUE) .Case(STR, true)
#include "llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def"
.Default(false);
}

static llvm::X86::ProcessorFeatures getFeature(StringRef Name) {
return llvm::StringSwitch<llvm::X86::ProcessorFeatures>(Name)
#define X86_FEATURE_COMPAT(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY) \
#define X86_FEATURE_COMPAT(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY, ABI_VALUE) \
Copy link
Contributor

@phoebewang phoebewang Nov 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ABI or API?

Copy link
Member Author

@mikolaj-pirog mikolaj-pirog Nov 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with both names -- I've picked ABI instead of API since it's low-level information on how features are stored in a table for multiversion functions

.Case(STR, llvm::X86::FEATURE_##ENUM)

#include "llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def"
Expand Down
36 changes: 18 additions & 18 deletions compiler-rt/lib/builtins/cpu_model/x86.c
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -135,13 +135,9 @@ enum ProcessorFeatures {
FEATURE_AVX512BW,
FEATURE_AVX512DQ,
FEATURE_AVX512CD,
FEATURE_AVX512ER,
FEATURE_AVX512PF,
FEATURE_AVX512VBMI,
FEATURE_AVX512VBMI = 26,
FEATURE_AVX512IFMA,
FEATURE_AVX5124VNNIW,
FEATURE_AVX5124FMAPS,
FEATURE_AVX512VPOPCNTDQ,
FEATURE_AVX512VPOPCNTDQ = 30,
FEATURE_AVX512VBMI2,
FEATURE_GFNI,
FEATURE_VPCLMULQDQ,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -181,8 +177,7 @@ enum ProcessorFeatures {
// FEATURE_OSXSAVE,
FEATURE_PCONFIG = 63,
FEATURE_PKU,
FEATURE_PREFETCHWT1,
FEATURE_PRFCHW,
FEATURE_PRFCHW = 66,
Comment on lines -184 to +180
Copy link
Contributor

@e-kud e-kud Nov 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about commenting out as above instead of deleting?

Copy link
Member Author

@mikolaj-pirog mikolaj-pirog Nov 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we comment out features not supported by llvm but supported gcc. This feature is not supported by gcc, so no comment

FEATURE_PTWRITE,
FEATURE_RDPID,
FEATURE_RDRND,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -231,7 +226,11 @@ enum ProcessorFeatures {
FEATURE_USERMSR,
FEATURE_AVX10_1 = 114,
FEATURE_AVX10_2 = 116,
FEATURE_AMX_AVX512,
FEATURE_AMX_TF32,
FEATURE_AMX_FP8 = 120,
FEATURE_MOVRS,
FEATURE_AMX_MOVRS,
CPU_FEATURE_MAX
};

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -961,10 +960,6 @@ static void getAvailableFeatures(unsigned ECX, unsigned EDX, unsigned MaxLeaf,
setFeature(FEATURE_AVX512IFMA);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((EBX >> 24) & 1))
setFeature(FEATURE_CLWB);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((EBX >> 26) & 1) && HasAVX512Save)
setFeature(FEATURE_AVX512PF);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((EBX >> 27) & 1) && HasAVX512Save)
setFeature(FEATURE_AVX512ER);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((EBX >> 28) & 1) && HasAVX512Save)
setFeature(FEATURE_AVX512CD);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((EBX >> 29) & 1))
Expand All @@ -974,8 +969,6 @@ static void getAvailableFeatures(unsigned ECX, unsigned EDX, unsigned MaxLeaf,
if (HasLeaf7 && ((EBX >> 31) & 1) && HasAVX512Save)
setFeature(FEATURE_AVX512VL);

if (HasLeaf7 && ((ECX >> 0) & 1))
setFeature(FEATURE_PREFETCHWT1);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((ECX >> 1) & 1) && HasAVX512Save)
setFeature(FEATURE_AVX512VBMI);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((ECX >> 4) & 1))
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1011,10 +1004,6 @@ static void getAvailableFeatures(unsigned ECX, unsigned EDX, unsigned MaxLeaf,
if (HasLeaf7 && ((ECX >> 29) & 1))
setFeature(FEATURE_ENQCMD);

if (HasLeaf7 && ((EDX >> 2) & 1) && HasAVX512Save)
setFeature(FEATURE_AVX5124VNNIW);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((EDX >> 3) & 1) && HasAVX512Save)
setFeature(FEATURE_AVX5124FMAPS);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((EDX >> 5) & 1))
setFeature(FEATURE_UINTR);
if (HasLeaf7 && ((EDX >> 8) & 1) && HasAVX512Save)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1088,6 +1077,17 @@ static void getAvailableFeatures(unsigned ECX, unsigned EDX, unsigned MaxLeaf,
if (HasLeafD && ((EAX >> 3) & 1) && HasAVXSave)
setFeature(FEATURE_XSAVES);

bool HasLeaf1E = MaxLevel >= 0x1e &&
!getX86CpuIDAndInfoEx(0x1e, 0x1, &EAX, &EBX, &ECX, &EDX);
if (HasLeaf1E && (EAX & 0x10))
setFeature(FEATURE_AMX_FP8);
if (HasLeaf1E && (EAX & 0x40))
setFeature(FEATURE_AMX_TF32);
if (HasLeaf1E && (EAX & 0x80))
setFeature(FEATURE_AMX_AVX512);
if (HasLeaf1E && (EAX & 0x100))
setFeature(FEATURE_AMX_MOVRS);

bool HasLeaf24 =
MaxLevel >= 0x24 && !getX86CpuIDAndInfo(0x24, &EAX, &EBX, &ECX, &EDX);
if (HasLeaf7Subleaf1 && ((EDX >> 19) & 1) && HasLeaf24) {
Expand Down
Loading