Symbol tags in SymbolInformation, WorkspaceSymbol, CallHierarchyItem and TypeHierarchyItem #170103
Conversation
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
ratzdi
force-pushed
the
users/ratzdi/symbol_tags_in_call_type_hierarchies_and_symbol_info
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6108868 to
6249e32
Compare
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
🐧 Linux x64 Test Results
✅ The build succeeded and all tests passed. |
ratzdi
force-pushed
the
users/ratzdi/symbol_tags_in_call_type_hierarchies_and_symbol_info
branch
2 times, most recently
from
67f011d to
16bbb43
Compare
in call-hierarchy and type-hierarchy.
ratzdi
force-pushed
the
users/ratzdi/symbol_tags_in_call_type_hierarchies_and_symbol_info
branch
from
5633044 to
96218ec
Compare
Fix code format.
ratzdi
force-pushed
the
users/ratzdi/symbol_tags_in_call_type_hierarchies_and_symbol_info
branch
from
96218ec to
79c265d
Compare
1 participant
This PR is continuation of #167536.
It adds code to compute symbol tags for the following types:
SymbolInformation
WorkspaceSymbol
CallHierarchyItem
TypeHierarchyItem
Related discussion: #113669 (comment)