-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
Revert "[flang][OpenMP] Fix firstprivate not working with lastprivate in DO SIMD" #171646
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
tblah
merged 1 commit into
main
from
revert-170163-flang-openmp-do-simd-firstprivate-fix
Dec 10, 2025
Merged
Revert "[flang][OpenMP] Fix firstprivate not working with lastprivate in DO SIMD" #171646
tblah
merged 1 commit into
main
from
revert-170163-flang-openmp-do-simd-firstprivate-fix
Dec 10, 2025
+23
−151
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… in DO S…" This reverts commit 748e7af.
Member
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-openmp @llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir Author: Tom Eccles (tblah) ChangesReverts llvm/llvm-project#170163 Regression in fujitsu test suite Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/171646.diff 5 Files Affected:
diff --git a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/OpenMP.cpp b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/OpenMP.cpp
index 9c25c1955cb78..582e684442dfc 100644
--- a/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/OpenMP.cpp
+++ b/flang/lib/Lower/OpenMP/OpenMP.cpp
@@ -3314,12 +3314,17 @@ static mlir::omp::WsloopOp genCompositeDoSimd(
genSimdClauses(converter, semaCtx, simdItem->clauses, loc, simdClauseOps,
simdReductionSyms);
- DataSharingProcessor wsloopItemDSP(converter, semaCtx, doItem->clauses, eval,
- /*shouldCollectPreDeterminedSymbols=*/true,
- /*useDelayedPrivatization=*/true,
- symTable);
+ DataSharingProcessor wsloopItemDSP(
+ converter, semaCtx, doItem->clauses, eval,
+ /*shouldCollectPreDeterminedSymbols=*/false,
+ /*useDelayedPrivatization=*/true, symTable);
wsloopItemDSP.processStep1(&wsloopClauseOps);
+ DataSharingProcessor simdItemDSP(converter, semaCtx, simdItem->clauses, eval,
+ /*shouldCollectPreDeterminedSymbols=*/true,
+ /*useDelayedPrivatization=*/true, symTable);
+ simdItemDSP.processStep1(&simdClauseOps, simdItem->id);
+
// Pass the innermost leaf construct's clauses because that's where COLLAPSE
// is placed by construct decomposition.
mlir::omp::LoopNestOperands loopNestClauseOps;
@@ -3338,9 +3343,8 @@ static mlir::omp::WsloopOp genCompositeDoSimd(
wsloopOp.setComposite(/*val=*/true);
EntryBlockArgs simdArgs;
- // For composite 'do simd', privatization is handled by the wsloop.
- // The simd does not create separate private storage for variables already
- // privatized by the worksharing construct.
+ simdArgs.priv.syms = simdItemDSP.getDelayedPrivSymbols();
+ simdArgs.priv.vars = simdClauseOps.privateVars;
simdArgs.reduction.syms = simdReductionSyms;
simdArgs.reduction.vars = simdClauseOps.reductionVars;
auto simdOp =
@@ -3350,7 +3354,7 @@ static mlir::omp::WsloopOp genCompositeDoSimd(
genLoopNestOp(converter, symTable, semaCtx, eval, loc, queue, simdItem,
loopNestClauseOps, iv,
{{wsloopOp, wsloopArgs}, {simdOp, simdArgs}},
- llvm::omp::Directive::OMPD_do_simd, wsloopItemDSP);
+ llvm::omp::Directive::OMPD_do_simd, simdItemDSP);
return wsloopOp;
}
diff --git a/flang/test/Integration/OpenMP/do-simd-firstprivate-lastprivate-runtime.f90 b/flang/test/Integration/OpenMP/do-simd-firstprivate-lastprivate-runtime.f90
deleted file mode 100644
index 4fef69188e0ee..0000000000000
--- a/flang/test/Integration/OpenMP/do-simd-firstprivate-lastprivate-runtime.f90
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-! Test runtime behavior of DO SIMD with firstprivate and lastprivate on same variable
-! This is the reproducer from issue #168306
-
-! REQUIRES: openmp-runtime
-
-! RUN: %flang_fc1 -fopenmp -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=LLVM
-! RUN: %flang -fopenmp %s -o %t && %t | FileCheck %s
-
-! LLVM-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_QQmain
-program main
- integer :: a
- integer :: i
-
- a = 10
- !$omp do simd lastprivate(a) firstprivate(a)
- do i = 1, 1
- ! Inside loop: a should be 10 (from firstprivate initialization)
- ! CHECK: main1 : a = 10
- print *, "main1 : a = ", a
- a = 20
- end do
- !$omp end do simd
- ! After loop: a should be 20 (from lastprivate copy-out)
- ! CHECK: main2 : a = 20
- print *, "main2 : a = ", a
-
- call sub
- ! CHECK: pass
- print *, 'pass'
-end program main
-
-subroutine sub
- integer :: a
- integer :: i
-
- a = 10
- !$omp do simd lastprivate(a) firstprivate(a)
- do i = 1, 1
- ! Inside loop: a should be 10 (from firstprivate initialization)
- ! CHECK: sub1 : a = 10
- print *, "sub1 : a = ", a
- a = 20
- end do
- !$omp end do simd
- ! After loop: a should be 20 (from lastprivate copy-out)
- ! CHECK: sub2 : a = 20
- print *, "sub2 : a = ", a
-end subroutine sub
diff --git a/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/do-simd-firstprivate-lastprivate.f90 b/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/do-simd-firstprivate-lastprivate.f90
deleted file mode 100644
index 429409926d47b..0000000000000
--- a/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/do-simd-firstprivate-lastprivate.f90
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
-! Test for DO SIMD with the same variable in both firstprivate and lastprivate clauses
-! This tests the fix for issue #168306
-
-! RUN: %flang_fc1 -fopenmp -mmlir --enable-delayed-privatization-staging=true -emit-hlfir %s -o - | FileCheck %s
-
-! Test case 1: Basic test with firstprivate + lastprivate on same variable
-! CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPdo_simd_first_last_same_var
-subroutine do_simd_first_last_same_var()
- integer :: a
- integer :: i
- a = 10
-
- ! CHECK: omp.wsloop
- ! CHECK-SAME: private(@{{.*}}firstprivate{{.*}} %{{.*}} -> %[[FIRSTPRIV_A:.*]], @{{.*}}private{{.*}} %{{.*}} -> %[[PRIV_I:.*]] : !fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>)
- ! CHECK-NEXT: omp.simd
- ! CHECK-NOT: private
- ! CHECK-NEXT: omp.loop_nest (%[[IV:.*]]) : i32
- !$omp do simd firstprivate(a) lastprivate(a)
- do i = 1, 1
- ! CHECK: %[[FIRSTPRIV_A_DECL:.*]]:2 = hlfir.declare %[[FIRSTPRIV_A]]
- ! CHECK: %[[PRIV_I_DECL:.*]]:2 = hlfir.declare %[[PRIV_I]]
- ! The private copy should be initialized from firstprivate (value 10)
- ! and then modified to 20
- a = 20
- end do
- !$omp end do simd
- ! After the loop, 'a' should be 20 due to lastprivate
-end subroutine do_simd_first_last_same_var
-
-! Test case 2: Test with lastprivate and firstprivate in reverse order
-! CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPdo_simd_last_first_reverse
-subroutine do_simd_last_first_reverse()
- integer :: a
- integer :: i
- a = 10
-
- ! CHECK: omp.wsloop
- ! CHECK-SAME: private(@{{.*}}firstprivate{{.*}} %{{.*}} -> %[[FIRSTPRIV_A:.*]], @{{.*}}private{{.*}} %{{.*}} -> %[[PRIV_I:.*]] : !fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>)
- ! CHECK-NEXT: omp.simd
- ! CHECK-NOT: private
- !$omp do simd lastprivate(a) firstprivate(a)
- do i = 1, 1
- a = 20
- end do
- !$omp end do simd
-end subroutine do_simd_last_first_reverse
-
-! Test case 3: Multiple variables with mixed privatization
-! CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPdo_simd_multiple_vars
-subroutine do_simd_multiple_vars()
- integer :: a, b, c
- integer :: i
- a = 10
- b = 20
- c = 30
-
- ! CHECK: omp.wsloop
- ! CHECK-SAME: private(@{{.*}}firstprivate{{.*}} %{{.*}} -> %{{.*}}, @{{.*}}firstprivate{{.*}} %{{.*}} -> %{{.*}}, @{{.*}}private{{.*}} %{{.*}} -> %{{.*}} : !fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>)
- ! CHECK-NEXT: omp.simd
- ! CHECK-NOT: private
- !$omp do simd firstprivate(a, b) lastprivate(a) private(c)
- do i = 1, 5
- a = a + 1
- b = b + 1
- c = i
- end do
- !$omp end do simd
-end subroutine do_simd_multiple_vars
-
-! Test case 4: Reproducer from issue #168306
-! CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPissue_168306_reproducer
-subroutine issue_168306_reproducer()
- integer :: a
- integer :: i
- a = 10
-
- ! CHECK: omp.wsloop
- ! CHECK-SAME: private(@{{.*}}firstprivate{{.*}} %{{.*}} -> %[[FIRSTPRIV_A:.*]], @{{.*}}private{{.*}} %{{.*}} -> %[[PRIV_I:.*]] : !fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>)
- ! CHECK-NEXT: omp.simd
- ! CHECK-NOT: private
- !$omp do simd lastprivate(a) firstprivate(a)
- do i = 1, 1
- ! Inside the loop, 'a' should start at 10 (from firstprivate)
- ! This is the key behavior that was broken
- a = 20
- end do
- !$omp end do simd
- ! After the loop, 'a' should be 20 (from lastprivate)
-end subroutine issue_168306_reproducer
diff --git a/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/order-clause.f90 b/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/order-clause.f90
index 9da7d905ceeed..d5799079b3759 100644
--- a/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/order-clause.f90
+++ b/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/order-clause.f90
@@ -36,15 +36,15 @@ end subroutine do_order
!CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPdo_simd_order() {
subroutine do_simd_order
- !CHECK: omp.wsloop order(reproducible:concurrent)
+ !CHECK: omp.wsloop order(reproducible:concurrent) {
!$omp do simd order(concurrent)
do i = 1, 10
end do
- !CHECK: omp.wsloop order(reproducible:concurrent)
+ !CHECK: omp.wsloop order(reproducible:concurrent) {
!$omp do simd order(reproducible:concurrent)
do i = 1, 10
end do
- !CHECK: omp.wsloop order(unconstrained:concurrent)
+ !CHECK: omp.wsloop order(unconstrained:concurrent) {
!$omp do simd order(unconstrained:concurrent)
do i = 1, 10
end do
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ end subroutine do_simd_order
!CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPdo_simd_order_parallel() {
subroutine do_simd_order_parallel
!CHECK: omp.parallel {
- !CHECK: omp.wsloop order(reproducible:concurrent)
+ !CHECK: omp.wsloop order(reproducible:concurrent) {
!$omp parallel do simd order(reproducible:concurrent)
do i = 1, 10
end do
diff --git a/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/wsloop-simd.f90 b/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/wsloop-simd.f90
index b18bc29efb230..03e35de04cace 100644
--- a/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/wsloop-simd.f90
+++ b/flang/test/Lower/OpenMP/wsloop-simd.f90
@@ -71,13 +71,16 @@ end subroutine do_simd_reduction
subroutine do_simd_private()
integer, allocatable :: tmp
! CHECK: omp.wsloop
- ! CHECK-SAME: private(@[[PRIV_IVAR_SYM:.*]] %{{.*}} -> %[[PRIV_IVAR:.*]] : !fir.ref<i32>)
! CHECK-NEXT: omp.simd
+ ! CHECK-SAME: private(@[[PRIV_BOX_SYM:.*]] %{{.*}} -> %[[PRIV_BOX:.*]], @[[PRIV_IVAR_SYM:.*]] %{{.*}} -> %[[PRIV_IVAR:.*]] : !fir.ref<!fir.box<!fir.heap<i32>>>, !fir.ref<i32>)
! CHECK-NEXT: omp.loop_nest (%[[IVAR:.*]]) : i32
!$omp do simd private(tmp)
do i=1, 10
+ ! CHECK: %[[PRIV_BOX_DECL:.*]]:2 = hlfir.declare %[[PRIV_BOX]]
! CHECK: %[[PRIV_IVAR_DECL:.*]]:2 = hlfir.declare %[[PRIV_IVAR]]
! CHECK: hlfir.assign %[[IVAR]] to %[[PRIV_IVAR_DECL]]#0
+ ! CHECK: %[[PRIV_BOX_LOAD:.*]] = fir.load %[[PRIV_BOX_DECL]]
+ ! CHECK: hlfir.assign %{{.*}} to %[[PRIV_BOX_DECL]]#0
! CHECK: omp.yield
tmp = tmp + 1
end do
@@ -87,11 +90,13 @@ end subroutine do_simd_private
subroutine do_simd_lastprivate_firstprivate()
integer :: a
! CHECK: omp.wsloop
- ! CHECK-SAME: private(@[[FIRSTPRIVATE_A_SYM:.*]] %{{.*}} -> %[[FIRSTPRIVATE_A:.*]], @[[PRIVATE_I_SYM:.*]] %{{.*}} -> %[[PRIVATE_I:.*]] : !fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>)
+ ! CHECK-SAME: private(@[[FIRSTPRIVATE_A_SYM:.*]] %{{.*}} -> %[[FIRSTPRIVATE_A:.*]] : !fir.ref<i32>)
! CHECK-NEXT: omp.simd
+ ! CHECK-SAME: private(@[[PRIVATE_A_SYM:.*]] %{{.*}} -> %[[PRIVATE_A:.*]], @[[PRIVATE_I_SYM:.*]] %{{.*}} -> %[[PRIVATE_I:.*]] : !fir.ref<i32>, !fir.ref<i32>)
!$omp do simd lastprivate(a) firstprivate(a)
do i = 1, 10
! CHECK: %[[FIRSTPRIVATE_A_DECL:.*]]:2 = hlfir.declare %[[FIRSTPRIVATE_A]]
+ ! CHECK: %[[PRIVATE_A_DECL:.*]]:2 = hlfir.declare %[[PRIVATE_A]]
! CHECK: %[[PRIVATE_I_DECL:.*]]:2 = hlfir.declare %[[PRIVATE_I]]
a = a + 1
end do
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #170163
Regression in fujitsu test suite