-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
[RISCV] Provide a more efficient lowering for experimental.cttz.elts. #88552
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cdea88b
[RISCV] Provide a more efficient lowering for experimental.cttz.elts.
topperc 3043928
fixup! Use getElementCount.
topperc ded1cf4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into pr/cttz_elts
topperc e64bd03
fixup! Update fix vector test.
topperc 13d5a6e
fixup! Use original result type for truncate in ReplaceNodeResults.
topperc 0148073
fixup! Remove single use variable.
topperc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1484,6 +1484,11 @@ bool RISCVTargetLowering::shouldExpandGetVectorLength(EVT TripCountVT, | |
return VF > MaxVF || !isPowerOf2_32(VF); | ||
} | ||
|
||
bool RISCVTargetLowering::shouldExpandCttzElements(EVT VT) const { | ||
return !Subtarget.hasVInstructions() || | ||
VT.getVectorElementType() != MVT::i1 || !isTypeLegal(VT); | ||
} | ||
|
||
bool RISCVTargetLowering::getTgtMemIntrinsic(IntrinsicInfo &Info, | ||
const CallInst &I, | ||
MachineFunction &MF, | ||
|
@@ -8718,6 +8723,29 @@ static SDValue lowerGetVectorLength(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG, | |
return DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, N->getValueType(0), Res); | ||
} | ||
|
||
static SDValue lowerCttzElts(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG, | ||
const RISCVSubtarget &Subtarget) { | ||
SDValue Op0 = N->getOperand(1); | ||
MVT OpVT = Op0.getSimpleValueType(); | ||
MVT ContainerVT = OpVT; | ||
if (OpVT.isFixedLengthVector()) { | ||
ContainerVT = getContainerForFixedLengthVector(DAG, OpVT, Subtarget); | ||
Op0 = convertToScalableVector(ContainerVT, Op0, DAG, Subtarget); | ||
} | ||
MVT XLenVT = Subtarget.getXLenVT(); | ||
SDLoc DL(N); | ||
auto [Mask, VL] = getDefaultVLOps(OpVT, ContainerVT, DL, DAG, Subtarget); | ||
SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(RISCVISD::VFIRST_VL, DL, XLenVT, Op0, Mask, VL); | ||
if (isOneConstant(N->getOperand(2))) | ||
return Res; | ||
|
||
// Convert -1 to VL. | ||
SDValue Setcc = | ||
DAG.getSetCC(DL, XLenVT, Res, DAG.getConstant(0, DL, XLenVT), ISD::SETLT); | ||
VL = DAG.getElementCount(DL, XLenVT, OpVT.getVectorElementCount()); | ||
return DAG.getSelect(DL, XLenVT, Setcc, VL, Res); | ||
} | ||
|
||
static inline void promoteVCIXScalar(const SDValue &Op, | ||
SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &Operands, | ||
SelectionDAG &DAG) { | ||
|
@@ -8913,6 +8941,8 @@ SDValue RISCVTargetLowering::LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN(SDValue Op, | |
} | ||
case Intrinsic::experimental_get_vector_length: | ||
return lowerGetVectorLength(Op.getNode(), DAG, Subtarget); | ||
case Intrinsic::experimental_cttz_elts: | ||
return lowerCttzElts(Op.getNode(), DAG, Subtarget); | ||
case Intrinsic::riscv_vmv_x_s: { | ||
SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(RISCVISD::VMV_X_S, DL, XLenVT, Op.getOperand(1)); | ||
return DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, Op.getValueType(), Res); | ||
|
@@ -12336,6 +12366,12 @@ void RISCVTargetLowering::ReplaceNodeResults(SDNode *N, | |
Results.push_back(DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, MVT::i32, Res)); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
case Intrinsic::experimental_cttz_elts: { | ||
EVT VT = N->getValueType(0); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Single use variable. |
||
SDValue Res = lowerCttzElts(N, DAG, Subtarget); | ||
Results.push_back(DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, VT, Res)); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
case Intrinsic::riscv_orc_b: | ||
case Intrinsic::riscv_brev8: | ||
case Intrinsic::riscv_sha256sig0: | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could handle the legal non-i1 case via s simple vector comparison against zero - producing a mask result that then flows through this code. From the tests, this looks like a pretty huge improvement in codegen quality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's true. I was just trying to cover the new usage from #88385