Fix S3_ACCESS_LOG pattern for S3 lifecycle events #317
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
❌ Author of the following commits did not sign a Contributor Agreement: Please, read and sign the above mentioned agreement if you want to contribute to this project |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Howdy!
S3.TRANSITION_GDA.OBJECT (S3 lifecycle) event format slightly differs from the 'regular ones' - the nonexistent request line is a double quoted dash, instead of an unquoted one and IP field in legacy pattern should account for a dash in those events as well. I think this should suffice.
Should we update