Skip to content

Conversation

@lopcode
Copy link
Owner

@lopcode lopcode commented Aug 31, 2025

Follows from discussion in #176 - I realised we could do this with static initialisers.

cc @jbaiter - what do you think of the docs (the README specifically)? You can ignore the javadoc HTML junk, it added a new section to everything because there's a new deprecation warning.

@lopcode lopcode self-assigned this Aug 31, 2025
@jbaiter
Copy link
Contributor

jbaiter commented Aug 31, 2025

LGTM! It's really the best solution I think, both from a "prevent users from doing the wrong thing" and a "keep the API simple and intuitive" perspective. README is great as well 👍🏾

@lopcode lopcode force-pushed the task/no-crash-when-not-inited branch from 2d8ce19 to c8fbc10 Compare August 31, 2025 14:39
@lopcode lopcode enabled auto-merge (squash) August 31, 2025 14:39
@lopcode lopcode merged commit af82060 into main Aug 31, 2025
7 checks passed
@lopcode lopcode deleted the task/no-crash-when-not-inited branch August 31, 2025 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants