fix(miss_headers): Add necessary headers for file control #59
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As the gcc suggestion, previous version miss required headers and use implict-function-declaration to pass
xc-tutor.c:1238:37: error: implicit declaration of function ‘open’; did you mean ‘popen’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1238 | else if (op == OPEN) { ax = open((char *)sp[1], sp[0]); } | ^~~~ | popen xc-tutor.c:1239:37: error: implicit declaration of function ‘close’; did you mean ‘pclose’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1239 | else if (op == CLOS) { ax = close(*sp);} | ^~~~~ | pclose xc-tutor.c:1240:37: error: implicit declaration of function ‘read’; did you mean ‘fread’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1240 | else if (op == READ) { ax = read(sp[2], (char *)sp[1], *sp); }
According to the linux man page, open is in <fcntl.h>, and read, close are in <unistd.h>
So I made this pr