Skip to content

Conversation

@pamaury
Copy link
Contributor

@pamaury pamaury commented Jan 26, 2026

Backport #27247. NOTE: despite what the GitHub UI says, #27247 actually only has two commits because the one is a subset of 9a66cc2 which was previously merged on earlgrey_1.0.0. So it appears that GH was happy to silently ignore the empty commit when merging.

@pamaury pamaury requested a review from a team as a code owner January 26, 2026 19:29
@pamaury pamaury requested review from cfrantz, jwnrt and timothytrippel and removed request for a team January 26, 2026 19:29
To avoid cyclic dependency when SKU code needs to use the response
structure, move the structure from ft_lib (which depends on the SKU
code) into util_lib.

The end to end personalization test still passes.

Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d8253e3)
When wating for successful post personalization restart in some cases
the text printed on the device console is not static and depends on
data generted during personalization.

Modify ft_ext() prototype to accept the response structure and to
return a String Option which the host would mix in with the constant
success string when defining the expected console output.

Tested with an updated Cros image which generates dev seed report.

Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 0f19189)
@pamaury pamaury added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 28, 2026
Merged via the queue into lowRISC:master with commit aa1dbe8 Jan 28, 2026
47 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants