Skip to content

Development: Fix disabling Sentry#196

Open
bensofficial wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/disable-sentry-for-server
Open

Development: Fix disabling Sentry#196
bensofficial wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/disable-sentry-for-server

Conversation

@bensofficial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bensofficial bensofficial commented Mar 26, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error tracking configuration output to ensure consistent and complete YAML structure in all scenarios, including when tracking credentials are not provided.

@bensofficial bensofficial self-assigned this Mar 26, 2026
@bensofficial bensofficial requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2026 18:04
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 26, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a523e718-79b2-4cab-acd0-fbc59d653ab9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33b404a and f19a8df.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • roles/artemis/templates/application-prod.yml.j2

Walkthrough

The Jinja template for production application configuration now explicitly renders a sentry: block with an empty dsn: field when the DSN is unavailable, whereas previously no sentry: block was emitted in that scenario. This ensures consistent YAML output structure across both conditional branches.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Sentry Configuration Template
roles/artemis/templates/application-prod.yml.j2
Added conditional logic to emit sentry: block with explicit empty dsn: field when DSN is not configured, changing YAML structure for the no-DSN case.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

🐰 A template tweak, so neat and bright,
When secrets don't exist, we set things right,
An empty DSN block now takes its place,
YAML structure keeps its consistent grace!
hops contentedly

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Development: Fix disabling Sentry' directly addresses the main change - fixing how Sentry is disabled in the production template configuration.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/disable-sentry-for-server

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant