Skip to content

Conversation

@surbhigoel77
Copy link
Collaborator

@surbhigoel77 surbhigoel77 commented Nov 6, 2025

The PR focuses on reformatting the OM4 masking file called wetmask and making it compatible to current eval code. Current eval code uses DINO masking variables like e1t * e2t instead of OM4's areacello. It has separate masks for variables like tmask, umask, vmask, fmask. Whereas, OM4 only has one mask wetmask

  • Provide documentation for guidance

This will close #83

@surbhigoel77 surbhigoel77 self-assigned this Nov 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: In Progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Evaluate OM4

2 participants