Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
how do you think? if it sounds good, I'll fix lint errors |
hirosassa
approved these changes
Mar 5, 2025
kitagry
approved these changes
Mar 5, 2025
Collaborator
|
@yokomotod Could you check conflicted files? |
yokomotod
force-pushed
the
lint-pyupgrade
branch
from
62f24b0 to
8ef1a04
Compare
yokomotod
force-pushed
the
lint-pyupgrade
branch
from
8ef1a04 to
005b9a1
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
Conflict resolved. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ruff's pyupgrade (UP) rule from https://github.com/asottile/pyupgrade enforce better new syntax.
ex.
Union[X, Y]=>X | Ytyping. Dict=>dict"hoge {}".format(x)=>f"hoge {x}"for more detail, https://github.com/m3dev/gokart/actions/runs/13666691452/job/38209273281?pr=447