Skip to content

Conversation

@nickolas-dimitrakas
Copy link
Contributor

@nickolas-dimitrakas nickolas-dimitrakas commented Nov 4, 2025

Background

  • Added unit tests to ensure full coverage for the logEvent:eventType:eventInfo: flow, including downstream calls to logEvent and logCustomEvent

What Has Changed

  • Added two new Swift test cases covering both branches of the event logging flow.

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have tested this locally.

Additional Notes

  • Coverage increased to 76%
image

Reference Issue (For employees only. Ignore if you are an outside contributor)

Copy link
Contributor

@denischilik denischilik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nickolas-dimitrakas nickolas-dimitrakas force-pushed the test/add-coverage-for-logEvent-eventType-eventInfo branch from 6830131 to c685fd2 Compare November 7, 2025 17:26
@nickolas-dimitrakas nickolas-dimitrakas merged commit fa1766c into main Nov 7, 2025
6 of 10 checks passed
@nickolas-dimitrakas nickolas-dimitrakas deleted the test/add-coverage-for-logEvent-eventType-eventInfo branch November 7, 2025 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants