[WEB-1435] dev: conflict free issue descriptions #5912
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces new URL patterns and methods to enhance the handling of issue descriptions within a Django application. Two new endpoints are added for active and archived issues, allowing users to retrieve and update descriptions. Additionally, a new URL pattern for draft issues is implemented. The changes also include the addition of methods in various view sets to support these functionalities, alongside updates to serializers and services that facilitate the retrieval and updating of binary descriptions. Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
aaryan610
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 55
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (33)
web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/index.ts (1)
1-4: Clean separation of editor variants!The new export structure clearly separates collaborative and non-collaborative editor variants, making the component capabilities more explicit and easier to understand.
packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/editor-wrapper.tsx (1)
15-15: Document the breaking type changeThe change in the
extensionsprop type fromExtension<any, any>[]toAnyExtension[]is a breaking change at the type level. Consider adding a comment explaining why this change was necessary and how it enables collaborative editing features.Add a JSDoc comment above the Props type:
+/** + * @breaking Changed extensions type to AnyExtension[] to support collaborative editing features + */ type Props = IEditorProps & { children?: (editor: Editor) => React.ReactNode; extensions: AnyExtension[]; };packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-read-only-editor.ts (2)
13-24: Add JSDoc documentation for the hook.Consider adding comprehensive JSDoc documentation to describe the hook's purpose, parameters, and return value. This will improve code maintainability and developer experience.
+/** + * A hook that creates a read-only collaborative rich text editor instance. + * @param props - Configuration options for the editor + * @param props.id - Unique identifier for the collaborative session + * @param props.value - Initial editor content as a Yjs update + * @param props.editorClassName - CSS class name for the editor + * @param props.editorProps - Additional props for the editor + * @param props.extensions - Array of Tiptap extensions + * @param props.fileHandler - Handler for file operations + * @param props.forwardedRef - Ref to access the editor instance + * @param props.handleEditorReady - Callback when editor is ready + * @param props.mentionHandler - Handler for mention functionality + * @returns Object containing the editor instance + */ export const useCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor = (props: TCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditorHookProps) => {
61-64: Add return type annotation for better type safety.Consider adding an explicit return type annotation to the hook for better type safety and documentation.
-export const useCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor = (props: TCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditorHookProps) => { +export const useCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor = ( + props: TCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditorHookProps +): { editor: ReturnType<typeof useReadOnlyEditor> } => {web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (2)
17-25: Consider improving type definitions for better type safety.The type definition could be enhanced in the following ways:
- Add JSDoc documentation to describe the purpose and usage of the component props.
- Make the
fetchDescriptionreturn type more specific thanPromise<any>.+/** + * Props for the CollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor component. + * @property descriptionHTML - The HTML string representation of the description + * @property fetchDescription - Function to fetch the binary description data + * @property projectId - Optional ID of the project + * @property workspaceSlug - Slug identifier for the workspace + */ type RichTextReadOnlyEditorWrapperProps = Omit< ICollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor, "fileHandler" | "mentionHandler" | "value" > & { descriptionHTML: string; - fetchDescription: () => Promise<any>; + fetchDescription: () => Promise<{ binary_data: Uint8Array }>; projectId?: string; workspaceSlug: string; };
38-43: Enhance loading state accessibility.The loading state should communicate its purpose to screen readers.
if (!descriptionBinary) return ( - <Loader> + <Loader aria-label="Loading description editor"> <Loader.Item height="150px" /> </Loader> );packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (1)
43-54: Enhance accessibility for read-only state.Add appropriate ARIA attributes to indicate the read-only state of the editor.
return ( <EditorContainer displayConfig={displayConfig} editor={editor} editorContainerClassName={editorContainerClassName} id={id} + aria-readonly="true" + role="textbox" >web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts (1)
12-15: LGTM! Consider enhancing state documentation.The hook initialization and state management look good. The comment "states" could be more descriptive about what the state represents.
- // states + // binary representation of the issue descriptionlive/src/core/lib/page.ts (2)
Line range hint
11-38: Consider enhancing error handling for invalid parameters.While the function validates the
updatedDescriptiontype, it silently returns ifworkspaceSlugorprojectIdare missing. Consider throwing descriptive errors for these cases to help with debugging.const workspaceSlug = params.get("workspaceSlug")?.toString(); const projectId = params.get("projectId")?.toString(); - if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !cookie) return; + if (!workspaceSlug) throw new Error("workspaceSlug is required"); + if (!projectId) throw new Error("projectId is required"); + if (!cookie) throw new Error("cookie is required");
Line range hint
40-57: Maintain consistent error handling across functions.Similar to the previous function, consider throwing errors for missing parameters instead of silently returning.
- if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !cookie) return; + if (!workspaceSlug) throw new Error("workspaceSlug is required"); + if (!projectId) throw new Error("projectId is required"); + if (!cookie) throw new Error("cookie is required");web/core/components/inbox/modals/create-modal/issue-description.tsx (1)
Line range hint
37-37: Track the GPT Assistance implementation.The TODO comment indicates a pending feature for GPT Assistance. This should be tracked to ensure it's not overlooked.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the GPT Assistance implementation?
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-editor.ts (2)
Line range hint
32-54: Consider standardizing error handling across connection scenarios.While the error handling is generally good, there's an inconsistency in how different connection failures are handled. The
onAuthenticationFailedcallback sets both states (serverError and connectionFailed), while theonClosehandler only sets these states for code 1006.Consider standardizing the error handling:
onAuthenticationFailed: () => { serverHandler?.onServerError?.(); setHasServerConnectionFailed(true); }, onConnect: () => serverHandler?.onConnect?.(), onClose: (data) => { - if (data.event.code === 1006) { + // Handle all abnormal closures (codes 1001-1015) + if (data.event.code >= 1001 && data.event.code <= 1015) { serverHandler?.onServerError?.(); setHasServerConnectionFailed(true); } },
Line range hint
56-71: Consider enhancing IndexedDB cleanup robustness.While the cleanup is generally good, the IndexedDB cleanup could be more robust by ensuring the provider exists before attempting cleanup.
Consider adding a null check:
useLayoutEffect(() => { const localProvider = new IndexeddbPersistence(id, provider.document); return () => { - localProvider?.destroy(); + if (localProvider) { + localProvider.destroy(); + } }; }, [provider, id]);web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (1)
79-80: Extract default HTML template to a constant.The default HTML template
"<p></p>"should be extracted to a named constant for better maintainability and reusability.+const DEFAULT_DESCRIPTION_TEMPLATE = "<p></p>"; + <IssueDescriptionInput containerClassName="-ml-3 border-none" - descriptionHTML={issue.description_html ?? "<p></p>"} + descriptionHTML={issue.description_html ?? DEFAULT_DESCRIPTION_TEMPLATE}packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts (1)
26-26: LGTM! Good architectural choice for conflict-free editing.The switch from
HocuspocusProviderto directY.Docreference is a solid architectural decision. Y.Doc's CRDT (Conflict-free Replicated Data Type) nature inherently handles concurrent edits and conflict resolution, making it ideal for collaborative issue descriptions.packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (1)
130-132: Consider adding JSDoc documentation.While the type definition is clear, adding JSDoc documentation would help explain the purpose of using
Uint8Arrayand how this type fits into the collaborative editing workflow.Example documentation:
+/** + * Interface for a read-only collaborative rich text editor that receives real-time updates. + * Uses Uint8Array for efficient binary data transfer in collaborative scenarios. + */ export type ICollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor = Omit<IReadOnlyEditorProps, "initialValue"> & { value: Uint8Array; };web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx (1)
Line range hint
89-106: Improve error handling and event tracking consistency.The event tracking shows "SUCCESS" state even when the update fails. Additionally, the error handling could be more informative by including the actual error message.
update: async (_workspaceSlug: string, _projectId: string, _issueId: string, data: Partial<TIssue>) => { try { await inboxIssue.updateIssue(data); captureIssueEvent({ eventName: "Inbox issue updated", payload: { ...data, state: "SUCCESS", element: "Inbox" }, updates: { changed_property: Object.keys(data).join(","), change_details: Object.values(data).join(","), }, path: pathname, }); } catch (error) { setToast({ title: "Issue update failed", - type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, - message: "Issue update failed", + type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, + message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : "Issue update failed", }); captureIssueEvent({ eventName: "Inbox issue updated", - payload: { state: "SUCCESS", element: "Inbox" }, + payload: { state: "FAILED", error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : "Unknown error", element: "Inbox" }, updates: { changed_property: Object.keys(data).join(","), change_details: Object.values(data).join(","), }, path: pathname, }); } },web/core/components/core/modals/gpt-assistant-popover.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-296: Consider adding rate limiting information in the UI.While the error handling includes a 429 status code message about the "50 requests per month per user" limit, it would be more user-friendly to show the remaining quota proactively in the UI before users hit the limit.
Consider adding a small indicator showing:
<div className="flex items-start justify-center gap-2 text-sm text-custom-primary"> <AlertCircle className="h-4 w-4" /> - <p>By using this feature, you consent to sharing the message with a 3rd party service. </p> + <p>By using this feature, you consent to sharing the message with a 3rd party service. ({remainingQuota} requests remaining this month)</p> </div>
Rate limiting and security measures need improvement
The AI service implementation lacks proper rate limiting controls. While there is error handling for 429 responses in the frontend, the backend does not implement rate limiting specifically for the AI endpoints. The service currently only has:
- Basic authentication checks through role-based permissions
- API key validation
- Error handling for missing configurations
Recommended improvements needed:
- Add rate limiting middleware specifically for AI endpoints to prevent abuse
- Implement request sanitization for user inputs
- Add request size limits for prompts
- Consider implementing user quotas for AI requests
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-296: Verify AI service security measures.The component sends user content to a third-party AI service. Let's verify the security measures in place.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for proper request sanitization and rate limiting in the AI service # Test 1: Look for request sanitization echo "Checking for request sanitization..." rg -A 5 "createGptTask" services/ # Test 2: Look for rate limiting implementation echo "Checking for rate limiting..." rg -A 5 "429" services/Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try searching in the entire codebase for AI service related files and implementations echo "Searching for AI service implementation..." fd -e ts -e tsx -e js "ai.service" echo "Searching for createGptTask usage and implementation..." rg -A 5 "createGptTask" echo "Checking rate limiting and error handling..." rg -A 5 "429|rate.?limit"Length of output: 189065
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the AI service implementation for rate limiting and security measures echo "Checking AI service implementation..." cat web/core/services/ai.service.ts echo "Checking API endpoint implementation..." rg -A 10 "/ai-assistant/" apiserver/Length of output: 2028
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the GPT integration endpoint implementation echo "Checking GPT integration endpoint implementation..." rg -A 20 "class GPTIntegrationEndpoint" apiserver/ rg -A 20 "class WorkspaceGPTIntegrationEndpoint" apiserver/ # Let's also check for any rate limiting configurations echo "Checking rate limiting configurations..." rg -A 10 "THROTTLE" apiserver/Length of output: 3503
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for rate limiting in settings and configurations echo "Checking Django settings for rate limiting..." rg -A 10 "REST_FRAMEWORK" apiserver/plane/settings/ # Let's also check the complete implementation of the GPT endpoints echo "Checking complete GPT endpoint implementation..." cat apiserver/plane/app/views/external/base.pyLength of output: 6316
apiserver/plane/app/urls/issue.py (1)
61-70: Consider using PUT/PATCH instead of POST for description updates.The URL pattern is well-structured and follows RESTful conventions. However, since this endpoint updates a resource (description), consider using PUT (for full updates) or PATCH (for partial updates) instead of POST to better align with REST principles.
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts (2)
Line range hint
197-206: Consider adding error handling for binary encoding.The implementation correctly handles the document state encoding, but consider adding try-catch for the Y.encodeStateAsUpdate operation to handle potential encoding errors gracefully.
getDocument: () => { - const documentBinary = providerDocument ? Y.encodeStateAsUpdate(providerDocument) : null; + let documentBinary = null; + if (providerDocument) { + try { + documentBinary = Y.encodeStateAsUpdate(providerDocument); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to encode document state:', error); + } + } const documentHTML = editorRef.current?.getHTML() ?? "<p></p>"; const documentJSON = editorRef.current?.getJSON() ?? null; return { binary: documentBinary, html: documentHTML, json: documentJSON, }; },
Line range hint
275-279: Enhance error handling and variable naming.Consider these improvements:
- Add error handling for Y.applyUpdate
- Rename the
documentvariable to avoid shadowing the globaldocumentobjectsetProviderDocument: (value) => { - const document = providerDocument; - if (!document) return; - Y.applyUpdate(document, value); + const yDoc = providerDocument; + if (!yDoc) return; + try { + Y.applyUpdate(yDoc, value); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to apply document update:', error); + } },web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (1)
376-387: Consider using a more specific return type.While the implementation is correct, using
Promise<any>as the return type loses type safety. Consider usingPromise<ArrayBuffer>since we're explicitly requesting an arraybuffer response.- async fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug: string, projectId: string, issueId: string): Promise<any> { + async fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug: string, projectId: string, issueId: string): Promise<ArrayBuffer> {apiserver/plane/settings/common.py (1)
384-384: Consider enhancing the LIVE_BASE_URL configuration.While the addition follows the pattern of other base URLs, consider these improvements:
- Add a default value or document that this URL is optional
- Add an inline comment explaining its purpose for real-time collaboration
- Consider validating the URL format when provided
Example enhancement:
-LIVE_BASE_URL = os.environ.get("LIVE_BASE_URL") +# Base URL for real-time collaboration services +LIVE_BASE_URL = os.environ.get("LIVE_BASE_URL", None) +if LIVE_BASE_URL and not urlparse(LIVE_BASE_URL).scheme: + raise ValueError("LIVE_BASE_URL must be a valid URL with scheme")apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py (2)
332-356: Add docstring and improve error handling consistency.The new method needs documentation and some minor improvements:
@allow_permission([ROLE.ADMIN, ROLE.MEMBER, ROLE.GUEST]) def retrieve_description(self, request, slug, project_id, pk): + """ + Retrieve the binary description of an archived issue. + + Args: + request: The HTTP request + slug: Workspace slug + project_id: Project identifier + pk: Issue primary key + + Returns: + StreamingHttpResponse: Binary description data + """ issue = Issue.objects.filter( pk=pk, workspace__slug=slug, project_id=project_id ).first() if issue is None: return Response( - {"error": "Issue not found"}, - status=404, + { + "error_code": ERROR_CODES["ISSUE_NOT_FOUND"], + "error": "The requested issue does not exist." + }, + status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND, ) binary_data = issue.description_binary def stream_data(): if binary_data: yield binary_data else: yield b"" response = StreamingHttpResponse( stream_data(), content_type="application/octet-stream" ) response["Content-Disposition"] = ( - 'attachment; filename="issue_description.bin"' + f'attachment; filename="issue_{pk}_description.bin"' ) return response
332-356: Consider reducing code duplication across viewsets.Since similar description retrieval functionality exists in other viewsets (InboxIssueViewSet and IssueViewSet), consider:
- Moving the common description handling logic to a mixin or base class
- Ensuring consistent error handling across all viewsets
Example mixin approach:
class IssueDescriptionMixin: def retrieve_description(self, request, slug, project_id, pk): """Base implementation for retrieving issue descriptions.""" issue = self.get_queryset().filter(pk=pk).first() if issue is None: return Response( { "error_code": ERROR_CODES["ISSUE_NOT_FOUND"], "error": "The requested issue does not exist." }, status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND, ) # ... rest of the implementationpackages/editor/src/core/providers/custom-collaboration-provider.ts (2)
22-26: Consider validating required configuration propertiesIn the default configuration,
nameis set to an empty string. Sincenameis required for proper operation, consider adding validation in the constructor or insetConfigurationto ensure that a validnameis provided.
45-45: Remove unnecessaryasynckeyword fromdocumentUpdateHandlerThe
documentUpdateHandlermethod is marked asasyncbut does not contain anyawaitexpressions. Unless you plan to add asynchronous operations, theasynckeyword can be removed.Apply this diff to remove the
asynckeyword:- async documentUpdateHandler(_update: Uint8Array, origin: any) { + documentUpdateHandler(_update: Uint8Array, origin: any) { // return if the update is from the provider itself if (origin === this) return; // call onChange with the update const stateVector = Y.encodeStateAsUpdate(this.document); this.configuration.onChange?.(stateVector); }packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts (1)
38-42: Adjust dependency array in useEffect for accurate updatesIncluding
provider.documentin the dependency array may not trigger re-renders appropriately sinceprovider.documentis a nested object. Instead, includeproviderto ensure the effect runs when the provider changes.Apply this diff to improve the code:
useEffect(() => { if (value && value.length > 0) { Y.applyUpdate(provider.document, value); } -}, [value, provider.document]); +}, [value, provider]);packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-editor.tsx (2)
41-45: Consider makinggetEditorClassNamesconfigurableCurrently,
getEditorClassNamesis called with hardcoded options. If there's a need to customize these options in different instances ofCollaborativeRichTextEditor, consider accepting them as props to make the component more flexible.
57-59: Unnecessary wrappingdivaroundEditorContentWrapperThe
divwrappingEditorContentWrappermay be unnecessary if it doesn't apply any styles or logic. Consider removing it to simplify the DOM structure.Apply this change to remove the extra
div:- <div className="flex flex-col"> <EditorContentWrapper editor={editor} id={id} tabIndex={tabIndex} /> - </div>live/src/server.ts (1)
85-85: Correct the typo in the commentThere's a typo in the comment. It should read "if
original_documentis null" instead of "id original_description is null".Apply this diff to correct the typo:
- // use updates to create the document id original_description is null + // use updates to create the document if original_document is nullpackages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts (1)
20-29: Consider renaming parameters for clarityIn the
applyUpdatesfunction, renaming thedocumentparameter toinitialDocorinitialStatecould enhance readability, clarifying that it represents the initial document state. Similarly, ifupdatesrepresents a single update, consider naming itupdatefor consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (50)
- apiserver/plane/app/urls/inbox.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/urls/issue.py (2 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/urls/workspace.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/settings/common.py (1 hunks)
- live/.prettierignore (1 hunks)
- live/.prettierrc (1 hunks)
- live/src/core/helpers/page.ts (0 hunks)
- live/src/core/lib/page.ts (3 hunks)
- live/src/server.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-editor.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/editor-wrapper.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-editor.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-read-only-editor.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-read-only-editor.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/providers/custom-collaboration-provider.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/providers/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/types/collaboration-hook.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/index.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/lib.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/core/modals/gpt-assistant-popover.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/index.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/inbox/modals/create-modal/issue-description.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/profile/activity/activity-list.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/profile/activity/profile-activity-list.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/hooks/use-page-fallback.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/services/page/project-page.service.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- live/src/core/helpers/page.ts
- packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs.ts
- web/core/services/page/project-page.service.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- live/.prettierignore
- live/.prettierrc
- packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/index.ts
- packages/editor/src/core/providers/index.ts
- packages/editor/src/core/types/index.ts
- packages/editor/src/lib.ts
- web/core/components/profile/activity/activity-list.tsx
- web/core/components/profile/activity/profile-activity-list.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py
[warning] 698-698: apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py#L698
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 698-698: apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py#L698
The application was found using therequestsmodule without configuring a timeout value for connections.apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py
[warning] 734-734: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L734
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 734-734: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L734
The application was found using therequestsmodule without configuring a timeout value for connections.apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py
[warning] 396-396: apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py#L396
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 396-396: apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py#L396
The application was found using therequestsmodule without configuring a timeout value for connections.
🔇 Additional comments (53)
web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/index.ts (1)
1-4: Verify migration from removed exports.Since the original
rich-text-editorandrich-text-read-only-editorexports were removed, we should verify that all existing imports have been updated to use the new editor components.✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results further by checking the actual imports in the files that still reference the old components.
Let me try one more verification to check imports from the rich-text-editor directory with the correct file type flags.
Let me try one final verification with the correct ripgrep syntax.
Based on the results from our previous verifications, I can now provide a final response:
Migration from old editor components appears complete
From our analysis:
- The only references to the old
rich-text-editorimports are within the new collaborative editor components themselves, where they're importing types and hooks from internal paths- No problematic legacy imports of the old components were found in the codebase
- The new exports are being properly used across the codebase, as evidenced by the extensive list of files importing the new editor components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining imports of the old editor components # that might have been missed during migration. echo "Checking for old editor imports..." rg -l "import.*rich-text-editor[\"']" || echo "No old editor imports found" rg -l "import.*rich-text-read-only-editor[\"']" || echo "No old read-only editor imports found" echo "Checking for new editor imports (for verification)..." rg -l "import.*collaborative-editor[\"']" rg -l "import.*collaborative-read-only-editor[\"']" rg -l "import.*editor[\"']" rg -l "import.*read-only-editor[\"']"Length of output: 5708
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual imports in files that showed matches for old editor components echo "Checking imports in collaborative-editor.tsx..." rg "import.*rich-text-editor[\"']" packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-editor.tsx -A 2 echo -e "\nChecking imports in collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx..." rg "import.*rich-text-read-only-editor[\"']" packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx -A 2 # Also check if these files are importing from the correct new paths echo -e "\nChecking all imports from rich-text-editor directory..." rg "from ['\"].*rich-text-editor.*['\"]" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 1102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check all imports from rich-text-editor directory with proper file type flags echo "Checking all imports from rich-text-editor directory..." rg "from ['\"].*rich-text-editor.*['\"]" -t typescript -t tsx # Also check if there are any direct references to the old component names echo -e "\nChecking references to old component names..." rg "RichTextEditor|RichTextReadOnlyEditor" -t typescript -t tsxLength of output: 431
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check imports and references with correct ripgrep syntax echo "Checking imports from rich-text-editor..." rg "from.*rich-text-editor" --type=ts --type=tsx echo -e "\nChecking references to old component names..." rg "RichTextEditor|RichTextReadOnlyEditor" --type=ts --type=tsx echo -e "\nChecking current imports in the codebase..." rg "from.*@/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor" --type=ts --type=tsxLength of output: 579
packages/editor/src/index.ts (2)
13-14: LGTM! New collaborative editor exports follow consistent naming patterns.The new exports for collaborative rich text editors are well-organized and follow the established naming conventions.
30-30: Verify the impact of yjs helper export change.The change from
@/helpers/yjsto@/helpers/yjs-utilsmight affect existing imports. Let's verify all usages have been updated.✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern to verify the imports.
Let me try one final verification to check the directory structure and file existence.
Export path change is correctly implemented
Based on the verification:
- The new file exists at
packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts- Only two files import from the new path:
packages/editor/src/lib.tsandpackages/editor/src/index.ts- No references to the old path were found
- The path in the export statement correctly uses the alias
@/helpers/yjs-utilswhich maps to the actual file location🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old yjs helper path # that might have been missed during the refactor. echo "Checking for any remaining imports from old path..." rg -l '@/helpers/yjs(?!-utils)' --type ts echo "Checking new utility usage patterns..." rg -l '@/helpers/yjs-utils' --type tsLength of output: 577
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for imports from both old and new paths echo "Checking imports patterns..." rg "from ['\"]@/helpers/yjs" -A 1 --type ts # List all files in the helpers directory to verify the module rename echo -e "\nListing helper files..." fd "yjs" packages/editor/src/helpers/Length of output: 535
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the correct path structure echo "Checking directory structure..." fd . packages/editor/src --type d echo -e "\nChecking for yjs related files..." fd yjs packages/editor/srcLength of output: 2323
web/core/hooks/use-page-fallback.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM! Good move to standardize binary data handling.Moving away from Node.js Buffer API to a dedicated conversion utility improves consistency and browser compatibility.
apiserver/plane/app/urls/inbox.py (1)
53-62: LGTM! The URL pattern follows RESTful conventions.The new endpoint for handling inbox issue descriptions is well-structured and consistent with the existing patterns.
Let's verify the consistency of description endpoints across different issue types:
✅ Verification successful
✓ URL pattern is consistent with other description endpoints
The implementation is verified to be consistent across different issue types:
- Regular issues (
issue/base.py)- Archived issues (
issue/archive.py)- Draft issues (
workspace/draft.py)- Inbox issues (
inbox/base.py)All implementations follow the same pattern with
retrieve_descriptionandupdate_descriptionmethods, maintaining consistency in the API design.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent implementation of description endpoints across issue types # Expected: Similar patterns for regular issues, archived issues, and draft issues # Search for description-related URL patterns rg -l 'description.*as_view.*retrieve_description.*update_description' apiserver/plane/app/urls/Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more flexible search pattern to find description-related URL patterns rg "description.*as_view" apiserver/plane/app/urls/ -A 5 # Also search for ViewSet methods related to descriptions rg "retrieve_description|update_description" apiserver/plane/app/views/ -A 2Length of output: 2211
packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/editor-wrapper.tsx (1)
1-1: Verify the impact of switching toAnyExtensionThe change from
Extension<any, any>toAnyExtensionmakes the type more permissive. While this might be necessary for collaborative editing features, we should verify that existing extensions continue to work as expected.Let's check for existing extension usage patterns:
Also applies to: 15-15
✅ Verification successful
Change to
AnyExtensionappears safe and aligned with the codebaseThe switch from
Extension<any, any>toAnyExtensionis a safe change because:
- The codebase already uses various Extension imports from @tiptap/core for different features
AnyExtensionis only used in editor-wrapper.tsx, suggesting this is an intentional type relaxation specifically for the editor wrapper component- No custom extensions in the codebase extend the base Extension class directly, so there's no risk of breaking existing extension implementations
- This change aligns with the collaborative editing features being introduced, providing more flexibility for extension types
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Extension type usage and extension implementations rg -t typescript -t tsx "extends Extension" rg -t typescript -t tsx "new Extension"Length of output: 157
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Extension type usage and extension implementations with correct file extensions rg "extends Extension" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts # Search for Extension instantiation rg "new Extension" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts # Search for Extension import patterns rg "import.*Extension.*from.*@tiptap" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts # Look for existing AnyExtension usage rg "AnyExtension" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t tsLength of output: 1809
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-read-only-editor.ts (1)
26-32: Verify the stability of theidprop.The provider is memoized with
idas the only dependency. Ensure thatidis stable across renders to prevent unnecessary provider re-creation, which could disrupt the collaborative session.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how the
idprop is passed down to this component.
Let me check one more thing to understand how the
idis being used in the actual implementation.
Let me try one final check to understand the id prop definition.
Let me check one final thing to understand how the id prop is being used in the hook.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide the final response:
The
idprop is used appropriately and stably in the implementation.The
idprop is only used to initialize theCustomCollaborationProviderwith a name parameter, which is used for collaboration purposes. The provider is properly memoized withidas its only dependency, which is the correct approach since a new provider instance should only be created when the collaboration identifier changes.The
idprop appears to be passed down from parent components and is used as a stable identifier for collaborative editing sessions. There's no evidence of it being generated during render or being unstable.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check how the id prop is generated/passed to this hook # Look for patterns where id might be unstable (e.g., generated in render) # Search for usage of this hook rg -A 5 "useCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor" # Search for potential unstable id generation ast-grep --pattern 'useCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor({ $$$ id: $_, $$$ })'Length of output: 2343
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the parent component's usage and id prop type definition rg -B 5 -A 10 "ICollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor" # Look for the component usage to see how id is passed rg -B 3 -A 3 "<CollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor" # Check the type definition to understand id's requirements ast-grep --pattern 'interface ICollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor { $$$ }'Length of output: 10641
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the interface that defines the id prop rg -B 5 -A 5 "interface IReadOnlyEditorProps" # Look for where the id is being passed from rg -B 5 -A 5 "id: string" --type typescriptLength of output: 917
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for id property in type definitions rg -B 5 -A 5 "id:" --type ts # Look for TCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditorHookProps definition ast-grep --pattern 'type TCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditorHookProps = { $$$ }'Length of output: 446134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for the hook implementation and usage rg -A 10 "useCollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor = \(props:" --type ts # Look for CustomCollaborationProvider implementation ast-grep --pattern 'class CustomCollaborationProvider { $$$ }'Length of output: 5085
web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (2)
63-63: LGTM! Good practice setting the display name.Setting the display name helps with debugging and React DevTools visualization.
27-61: Verify component integration with issue views.Let's ensure this new component is properly integrated where read-only issue descriptions are displayed.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the component's integration:
Component is properly integrated in the issue description flow
The
CollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditoris correctly integrated within thedescription-input.tsxcomponent, which handles both editable and read-only states of issue descriptions. The component is rendered conditionally when the description is in read-only mode, with all required props being passed correctly:
- Proper integration with workspace and project context
- Correct handling of description HTML and fetch operations
- Appropriate styling with container className
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usage of CollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor in issue-related components echo "Searching for component usage in issue views..." rg -l "CollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor" | grep -i "issue" echo "Checking for potential places where this component should be used..." rg -l "description.*readonly" | grep -i "issue"Length of output: 408
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the usage context in description-input.tsx and look for related components echo "Checking description-input.tsx implementation:" rg -A 10 -B 10 "CollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor" "web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx" echo "\nChecking for other description-related components:" rg -l "description.*input|description.*editor" --type tsx echo "\nChecking for issue view components:" fd -e tsx -e ts issueLength of output: 12671
packages/editor/src/core/types/collaboration-hook.ts (4)
Line range hint
22-34: Well-structured base type definition!Good separation of common props into
TCollaborativeEditorHookCommonProps. The removal of realtime-specific properties from the base type improves the type hierarchy and makes it clearer which features are available to different editor variants.
35-45: Strong type safety in editor variants!Excellent use of TypeScript features:
- Proper type inheritance from common props
- Well-constrained read-only file handler using
Pick<>- Correctly typed ref forwarding for both editor variants
56-67: Robust type definitions for collaborative document editing!The types correctly handle realtime collaboration requirements. The optional
embedHandlerprovides good flexibility.Consider documenting security implications of the
embedHandlerto prevent potential XSS vulnerabilities through embedded content.Let's check for security measures around embeds:
47-54: Verify binary data handling implementation.The use of
Uint8Arrayfor rich text content storage suggests binary serialization. Ensure that:
- The binary format is well-documented
- There are appropriate size limits and validation
- Error handling exists for malformed binary data
Let's check for related validation code:
✅ Verification successful
Let's search more broadly for Uint8Array usage patterns and related error handling to better understand the implementation.
Binary data handling is well-implemented with proper validation and error handling
Based on the codebase analysis, the use of
Uint8Arrayfor rich text content is properly implemented with:
- Type validation:
if (!(updatedDescription instanceof Uint8Array)) { throw new Error("Invalid updatedDescription: must be an instance of Uint8Array"); }
- Proper encoding/decoding:
- Uses Y.js for binary serialization (
Y.encodeStateAsUpdate)- Has utility functions for base64 conversion (
convertBinaryDataToBase64String,convertBase64StringToBinaryData)- Handles empty states with
new Uint8Array()
- Error handling:
- Catches and logs errors during transformation
- Validates binary data before processing
- Has fallback mechanisms when binary data is empty
The implementation follows best practices for handling binary data in a collaborative editor context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Uint8Array validation or size limits rg -A 3 "Uint8Array.*valid|maxSize|limit" # Look for error handling related to binary data rg -A 3 "catch.*Uint8Array|error.*binary|malformed"Length of output: 157
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Uint8Array usage and handling patterns rg -A 5 "Uint8Array" --type typescript # Look for binary data conversion or processing ast-grep --pattern 'function $_(Uint8Array $_) { $$$ }' # Search for any error handling around binary data rg -A 5 "try.*Uint8Array|catch.*binary|decode.*error"Length of output: 189
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Uint8Array usage without file type flag rg -A 5 "Uint8Array" # Look for encoding/decoding related to binary data rg -A 5 "encode|decode|serialize|deserialize" packages/editor/ # Search for any validation or error handling patterns rg -A 5 "instanceof Uint8Array|isValid|validate" packages/editor/Length of output: 35606
packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (2)
11-11: LGTM! Clean import rename.The hook import has been cleanly renamed to follow a more specific naming convention, better reflecting its document-specific functionality.
39-39: LGTM! Consistent hook usage update.The hook usage has been correctly updated to match the new name while maintaining all existing functionality and parameter structure.
Let's verify that the hook renaming is consistent across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Hook renaming is complete and consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No instances of the old hook name
useReadOnlyCollaborativeEditorexist- The new hook name
useCollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditoris used consistently in:
- The hook definition file
- The component import statement
- The hook invocation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that old hook name is completely replaced # Test 1: Check for any remaining references to the old hook name echo "Checking for old hook name references..." rg "useReadOnlyCollaborativeEditor" # Test 2: Verify the new hook name is used consistently echo "Checking new hook name usage..." rg "useCollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditor"Length of output: 827
packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (4)
1-12: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are properly categorized and follow a consistent pattern using absolute paths.
58-68: LGTM! Well-implemented forwardRef wrapper.The implementation follows React best practices by:
- Using proper TypeScript types for the ref and props
- Setting a display name for debugging
- Correctly forwarding the ref to the main component
70-70: LGTM! Clean exports.Correctly exports only the ref-enabled version of the component.
50-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider removing EditorBubbleMenu in read-only mode.
Including an editor bubble menu in a read-only component might confuse users by suggesting editability. Unless there are specific read-only actions in the bubble menu, consider removing it.
web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts (2)
47-49: LGTM! Clean and focused effect.The effect correctly resets the description state when the issue ID changes.
51-55: LGTM! Clear and consistent return value.The hook returns exactly what's needed for consumers to work with the description state and update functionality.
packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-editor.tsx (2)
11-11: LGTM! Import statement updated for clarity.The import statement has been updated to use a more specific hook name, which better reflects its purpose.
45-45: LGTM! Hook usage updated consistently.The hook has been renamed to be more specific while maintaining the same interface.
Let's verify the hook exists and is exported correctly:
✅ Verification successful
Hook is correctly defined and imported
The verification confirms that:
- The hook
useCollaborativeDocumentEditoris properly defined and exported inpackages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-editor.ts- It's correctly imported and used in
collaborative-editor.tsx- The implementation maintains the expected interface with
editor,hasServerConnectionFailed, andhasServerSyncedreturn values🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new hook exists and is exported # Test: Search for the hook definition and its exports ast-grep --pattern 'export { useCollaborativeDocumentEditor }'Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more comprehensive search for the hook definition and exports # First, search for the hook definition ast-grep --pattern 'const useCollaborativeDocumentEditor = ' # Also search for any exports containing this hook name rg "useCollaborativeDocumentEditor" -A 2 # And search for potential file names containing this hook fd "collaborative.*\.(ts|tsx)"Length of output: 2036
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-read-only-editor.ts (2)
10-10: LGTM! Improved naming convention.The renaming of the type and hook to include "CollaborativeDocument" prefix better reflects their purpose and improves code clarity.
Also applies to: 12-12
82-82: Verify consistent usage of providerDocument across the codebase.The change to pass
providerDocumentdirectly instead of the entire provider is a good improvement that reduces coupling. However, let's verify that this pattern is consistently applied in other collaborative editor implementations.✅ Verification successful
The change to use providerDocument is consistently applied across collaborative editor implementations
The search results confirm that all collaborative editor hooks (
use-collaborative-document-editor.ts,use-collaborative-document-read-only-editor.ts,use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts, anduse-collaborative-rich-text-read-only-editor.ts) consistently useproviderDocument: provider.documentwhen passing data to the editor. This change aligns with the codebase's patterns and maintains consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of providerDocument vs provider in editor hooks # Expected: All collaborative editor implementations should use providerDocument # Search for provider usage in editor hooks rg -t typescript "provider\.(document|doc)" "packages/editor/src" # Search for direct provider passing rg -t typescript "provider: provider[,}\]]" "packages/editor/src"Length of output: 201
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try without the file type filter since typescript is not recognized # Search for provider.document usage rg "provider\.(document|doc)" "packages/editor/src" # Search for direct provider passing rg "provider: provider[,}\]]" "packages/editor/src" # Also search for useReadOnlyEditor hook usage to understand the pattern rg "useReadOnlyEditor" "packages/editor/src"Length of output: 3043
live/src/core/lib/page.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM! Import changes improve modularity.The migration to specialized editor functions from
@plane/editor/libenhances code organization and maintainability.
Line range hint
59-84: Align error handling with other functions.This function returns
nullfor missing parameters while other functions returnundefinedor throw errors. Consider maintaining consistent error handling across all functions.Let's check how this function is used in the codebase:
const workspaceSlug = params.get("workspaceSlug")?.toString(); const projectId = params.get("projectId")?.toString(); - if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !cookie) return null; + if (!workspaceSlug) throw new Error("workspaceSlug is required"); + if (!projectId) throw new Error("projectId is required"); + if (!cookie) throw new Error("cookie is required");web/core/components/inbox/modals/create-modal/issue-description.tsx (3)
Line range hint
38-102: Implementation looks good!The component implementation:
- Follows React best practices
- Has proper TypeScript type safety
- Implements appropriate error handling for file uploads
- Uses proper state management with MobX
13-13: Verify consistent usage of the new editor import path.The simplified import path suggests a restructuring of editor component exports. Let's ensure this change is consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is consistent with the codebase structure
The verification shows that the simplified import path
@/components/editoris being used consistently across the web application components, including other issue-related components likedescription-input.tsxanddescription-editor.tsx. This change aligns with the codebase's import patterns and maintains consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and verify new import usage # Test 1: Look for any remaining old specific imports rg "from \"@/components/editor/rich-text-editor/rich-text-editor\"" # Test 2: Verify new import pattern usage rg "from \"@/components/editor\".*RichTextEditor"Length of output: 190
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to verify the imports # First, let's check for any imports of RichTextEditor across the codebase rg "import.*RichTextEditor" -A 1 # Also check for any files that might still use the old path pattern rg "editor/rich-text-editor"Length of output: 2289
Line range hint
38-102: Consider concurrent editing scenarios.Given that this PR focuses on conflict-free issue descriptions, consider how this component will handle concurrent edits. The current implementation might benefit from:
- Visual indicators for when others are editing
- Conflict resolution UI elements
- Integration with the new binary description handling mentioned in the PR
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-editor.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-12: LGTM! Well-organized imports and consistent type naming.The imports are properly structured and the type rename aligns well with the hook's new name, maintaining good code organization.
Line range hint
14-31: LGTM! Clear hook naming and well-structured props.The hook's new name better reflects its purpose, and the props destructuring is comprehensive with appropriate defaults.
Line range hint
73-104: Verify the impact of switching from provider to providerDocument.The change from passing the full provider to only passing provider.document is a significant change that could affect other components or extensions that might expect the full provider object.
Let's verify if any extensions or components rely on the full provider object:
✅ Verification successful
Change from provider to providerDocument is safe
Based on the codebase analysis:
- The
provider.documentis consistently used across all collaborative editor hooks- The full
providerobject is only passed toDocumentEditorAdditionalExtensions, which is still maintained in the new code- The Collaboration extension correctly receives
provider.documentas requiredThe change is safe as it maintains both the required document reference for the Collaboration extension and the full provider object where needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of provider in extensions or components rg -t typescript -t javascript "provider\." "packages/editor/src/(extensions|components)"Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of provider in extensions or components with ripgrep # Note: Using just file extension patterns instead of file type rg "provider\." "packages/editor/src/extensions/" "packages/editor/src/components/" # Also search for any direct provider object usage rg "provider:" "packages/editor/src/extensions/" "packages/editor/src/components/" # Search for provider type definitions to understand the interface rg "interface.*Provider" "packages/editor"Length of output: 620
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's find the correct directory structure fd -t d "editor" # Then search for provider usage in the entire editor package rg "provider\." packages/editor/ # Look at the DocumentEditorAdditionalExtensions implementation since it receives provider rg -A 5 "DocumentEditorAdditionalExtensions" packages/editor/Length of output: 4144
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (1)
82-91: Verify integration with collaborative editing features.The new binary format for descriptions suggests this is part of collaborative editing improvements. Let's verify the integration with related components.
✅ Verification successful
Binary description format is properly integrated with collaborative editing
The code shows proper integration between the binary description format and collaborative editing:
- The
IssueDescriptionInputcomponent uses binary format for fetching and updating descriptions- The collaborative editor implementation in
packages/editorsupports this format through theuseCollaborativeRichTextEditorhook- The binary format is consistently used across issue-related services and components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other components using binary description format echo "Searching for components using binary description..." rg -l "description_binary" --type ts --type tsx # Search for collaborative editing hooks echo "Searching for collaborative editing hooks..." rg -l "useCollaborative" --type ts --type tsx # Search for related services echo "Searching for related binary description services..." rg -l "DescriptionBinary" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 553
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other components using binary description format echo "Searching for components using binary description..." rg -l "description_binary" # Search for collaborative editing hooks echo "Searching for collaborative editing hooks..." rg -l "useCollaborative" # Search for related services echo "Searching for related binary description services..." rg -l "fetchDescriptionBinary|updateDescriptionBinary" # Search for collaborative editing related code echo "Searching for collaborative editing related code..." rg -l "collaborative.*edit"Length of output: 3304
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how the binary description is used with collaborative editor echo "Checking integration between binary description and collaborative editor..." rg -A 5 "description_binary.*collaborative" packages/editor/src/core/ # Check the implementation of collaborative editor with binary data echo "Checking collaborative editor implementation..." rg -A 10 "useCollaborative.*binary" packages/editor/src/core/hooks/ # Check how issue-detail integrates with collaborative editing echo "Checking issue-detail integration..." rg -A 10 "collaborative" web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsxLength of output: 573
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of issue-detail.tsx to understand the editor integration echo "Checking issue-detail.tsx content..." cat web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx # Check the rich text editor implementation echo "Checking rich text editor implementation..." cat web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/index.ts # Check collaborative editor component echo "Checking collaborative editor component..." cat packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-editor.tsxLength of output: 6302
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts (1)
Line range hint
88-97: Consider validating providerDocument state before encoding.While the encoding logic is correct, consider adding validation to ensure the providerDocument is in a valid state before encoding. This could prevent potential issues with corrupted or uninitialized documents.
Consider this improvement:
- const documentBinary = providerDocument ? Y.encodeStateAsUpdate(providerDocument) : null; + const documentBinary = providerDocument?.store?.clients.size + ? Y.encodeStateAsUpdate(providerDocument) + : null;Let's verify the current usage pattern:
packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (2)
94-98: LGTM! Well-structured collaborative editor interface.The use of
Uint8Arrayfor both value and onChange handler is a good choice for efficient binary data transfer in collaborative editing scenarios.
94-98: Verify collaborative editing implementation consistency.Let's ensure the collaborative editing types are consistently implemented across the codebase.
Also applies to: 130-132
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the implementation consistency.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the complete implementation pattern.
Collaborative editing implementation is consistent across the codebase
The verification shows consistent implementation of collaborative editing features:
ICollaborativeRichTextEditorinterface is properly implemented in collaborative componentsUint8Arrayis consistently used for binary data handling across the codebase- Value and onChange props maintain type consistency in all relevant files
- Proper integration exists between web and package components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent implementation of collaborative editing features # Test 1: Check for Uint8Array usage in related files echo "Checking for consistent Uint8Array usage in collaborative components..." rg -l "Uint8Array" --type ts --type tsx # Test 2: Verify presence of necessary collaborative components echo "Verifying collaborative components..." fd -e tsx -e ts collaborativeLength of output: 1113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation details of collaborative components # Look for Uint8Array usage patterns in collaborative files echo "Checking Uint8Array usage patterns..." rg "Uint8Array" -A 2 packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-editor.tsx rg "Uint8Array" -A 2 packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts # Check for onChange handlers with Uint8Array echo -e "\nChecking onChange implementations..." ast-grep --pattern 'onChange: ($value: Uint8Array) => $_' # Look for any other binary data handling patterns echo -e "\nChecking for other binary data handling..." rg "new Uint8Array|Uint8Array\.from" --type tsLength of output: 1463
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for interface implementations and prop types # Look for ICollaborativeRichTextEditor interface usage echo "Checking interface implementations..." rg "ICollaborativeRichTextEditor" -A 3 --type ts # Check for onChange handlers in collaborative components echo -e "\nChecking onChange handlers in components..." rg "onChange.*Uint8Array" -A 2 packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts rg "onChange.*Uint8Array" -A 2 packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-editor.tsx # Check for value prop handling echo -e "\nChecking value prop handling..." rg "value:.*Uint8Array" -A 2 --type tsLength of output: 3989
web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Type import is correctly placedThe addition of
TDocumentPayloadtype import is properly organized with other type imports.
79-112: Verify consistent implementation across servicesLet's verify if similar binary description handling is implemented consistently across other services.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation in the issue service to ensure consistency.
Let me check one more thing to verify the complete implementation pattern.
Binary description handling is consistently implemented
The implementation in
inbox-issue.service.tsfollows the same pattern as found in other services:
issue.service.tsimplements identical binary description handling with same headers and response typesproject-page.service.tsfollows the same pattern for binary content- All services consistently use
application/octet-streamcontent type andarraybufferresponse type🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar binary description handling patterns echo "Searching for similar binary description endpoints..." rg -l "description.*binary" --type ts echo "Checking for arraybuffer response type usage..." rg "responseType:\s*['\"]arraybuffer" --type ts echo "Checking for octet-stream content type..." rg "Content-Type.*octet-stream" --type tsLength of output: 1762
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check implementation in issue.service.ts echo "Checking issue service implementation..." rg -A 15 "fetchDescriptionBinary" web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts echo "\nChecking project page service implementation..." rg -A 15 "binary" web/core/services/page/project-page.service.tsLength of output: 879
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check updateDescriptionBinary implementation echo "Checking updateDescriptionBinary in issue service..." rg -A 10 "updateDescriptionBinary" web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts echo "\nChecking binary handling in project page service..." rg -B 2 -A 10 "octet-stream" web/core/services/page/project-page.service.tsLength of output: 1169
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (1)
93-94: LGTM: Proper fallback for empty description.The null coalescing operator ensures a valid default value for empty descriptions.
web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx (1)
130-139: Verify consistent binary description handling across components.Let's ensure that the binary description handling is consistently implemented across all issue-related components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search strategy to verify the binary description handling implementation.
Binary description handling is consistently implemented across components
The verification shows consistent implementation of binary description handling:
The
fetchDescriptionBinaryandupdateDescriptionBinarymethods are properly implemented in relevant service files:
web/core/services/issue/issue.service.tsweb/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.tsweb/core/services/page/project-page.service.tsThe same pattern is correctly used across all issue-related components:
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsxweb/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsxweb/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsxThe implementation in the reviewed file follows the established pattern used throughout the codebase, ensuring consistency in binary description handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other components using description binary operations echo "Searching for components using binary description operations..." rg -l "description_binary" --type ts --type tsx # Search for similar fetch/update patterns echo "Checking for similar fetch/update patterns..." ast-grep --pattern 'fetchDescription={async () => { $$$ return await $service.fetchDescriptionBinary($$$) }}'Length of output: 427
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for files containing description binary operations with proper file extensions echo "Searching for components using binary description operations..." rg -l "description[_-]binary" --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type tsx --type ts # Search for service methods related to binary description echo "Checking service implementations..." rg -A 2 "fetchDescriptionBinary|updateDescriptionBinary" --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type tsx --type ts # Look for any other editor components that might need similar implementation echo "Checking for other editor components..." rg -l "RichTextEditor|TextEditor" --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type tsx --type tsLength of output: 6542
apiserver/plane/app/urls/workspace.py (1)
279-288: Verify consistent implementation across issue types.Since this PR aims to handle conflict-free issue descriptions, let's verify that similar patterns are implemented consistently across other issue types (inbox, regular, archived).
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the URL patterns more precisely to ensure complete consistency.
Consistent implementation confirmed across all issue types
The verification shows that description endpoints are consistently implemented:
- Regular issues:
IssueViewSetwithretrieve_descriptionandupdate_description- Inbox issues:
InboxIssueViewSetwith matching methods- Archived issues:
IssueArchiveViewSetwith matching methods- Draft issues:
WorkspaceDraftIssueViewSetwith matching methodsAll implementations follow the same pattern with appropriate GET/POST methods and consistent URL structure, differing only in their base paths as required by their respective issue types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent implementation of description endpoints across issue types # Test 1: Check for similar URL patterns in other URL files echo "Checking URL patterns for description endpoints..." rg -l "description/" apiserver/plane/app/urls/ # Test 2: Check for consistent method names across ViewSets echo "Checking ViewSet method implementations..." rg -A 2 "retrieve_description|update_description" apiserver/plane/app/views/Length of output: 2544
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the exact URL patterns and their corresponding ViewSet methods for description endpoints echo "Checking description URL patterns in issue-related files..." rg -A 5 "description/" apiserver/plane/app/urls/issue.py apiserver/plane/app/urls/inbox.py echo -e "\nChecking if archive issues have description endpoint..." rg "archive.*description" apiserver/plane/app/urls/Length of output: 1977
web/core/components/core/modals/gpt-assistant-popover.tsx (1)
12-12: LGTM! Import path simplified.The import statement has been simplified to use a more maintainable path.
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts (1)
57-57: LGTM: Props destructuring updated consistently.The rename from
providertoproviderDocumentmaintains consistency with the interface change.web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM: Type import is correctly placed and used.The
TDocumentPayloadtype import is appropriately grouped with other type imports and is used correctly in the method signature.
376-402: Verify security and performance considerations for binary data handling.
Security: Ensure server-side validation enforces:
- Maximum size limits for binary data
- Content type validation
- User permissions
Performance: Consider implementing:
- Client-side caching strategy for binary descriptions
- Progress indicators for large transfers
- Compression for binary data
✅ Verification successful
Let's search for relevant validation and caching implementations in the backend code. Since the frontend is making requests to
/api/workspaces/{workspaceSlug}/projects/{projectId}/issues/{issueId}/description/, we should find the corresponding backend implementation.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response since we have found relevant information about security and performance implementations in the backend:
Binary data handling has adequate security measures but could benefit from client-side optimizations
Security measures are in place:
- File size limits are enforced through
settings.FILE_SIZE_LIMIT(5MB default)- Content type validation exists for octet-stream data
- Proper file validation through
file_sizevalidator- Secure streaming responses with proper content disposition
Performance considerations:
- Server implements streaming responses (
StreamingHttpResponse) for efficient data transfer- Basic caching is implemented with
@cache_control(private=True, max_age=12)for some endpoints- Base64 encoding/decoding is used for data integrity
However, the frontend implementation could be enhanced by:
- Implementing client-side caching for frequently accessed descriptions
- Adding progress indicators for large transfers as suggested
- Considering compression before transmission
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for size limits and validation in the backend rg -A 5 "description_binary" --type pythonLength of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for binary data handling in Python files with .py extension rg -A 5 "description_binary" -g "*.py" # Search for file size or content type validation patterns rg -A 5 "content.*type|file.*size|max.*size" -g "*.py" # Look for API endpoint definitions handling binary data rg -A 5 "content_type.*octet-stream|application/octet-stream" -g "*.py" # Search for cache configuration or implementation rg -A 5 "cache.*control|caching" -g "*.py"Length of output: 36499
packages/editor/src/core/providers/custom-collaboration-provider.ts (1)
45-47: Ensureorigincorrectly identifies updates from this providerYou're comparing
origin === thisto determine if the update originated from this provider. Verify that when you apply updates to the document, you passthisas theorigin. If not, this check may not work as intended.packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts (1)
39-41: Verify handling of empty or zero-length 'value'If
valueis empty, the current logic skips applying updates. Confirm whether this is the intended behavior or if the document should be reset or cleared in this case.packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/rich-text/collaborative-editor.tsx (1)
29-39: PassdisplayConfigtouseCollaborativeRichTextEditorif necessaryThe
displayConfigprop is being extracted but not used withinuseCollaborativeRichTextEditor. IfdisplayConfigaffects the editor's setup or behavior, consider passing it to the hook or using it where appropriate.Please verify whether
displayConfigshould be utilized within theuseCollaborativeRichTextEditorhook.web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-editor.tsx (2)
45-51: EnsureuploadFilefunction handles errors gracefullyThe
uploadFileprop should handle errors such as network failures or invalid files. Ensure that any errors are properly caught and communicated back to the editor to inform the user.If not already implemented, consider updating the
uploadFilefunction to include error handling:async function uploadFile(file: File): Promise<string> { try { // Upload logic here } catch (error) { // Handle error, possibly rethrow or return a default value throw new Error("File upload failed"); } }
57-57: Confirmcnfunction handlesundefinedvalues incontainerClassNameIf
containerClassNameisundefined, ensure that thecnhelper function can handleundefinedvalues without causing issues. This will prevent potential errors in class name concatenation.If
cndoes not handleundefinedgracefully, provide a default empty string:return ( <CollaborativeRichTextEditorWithRef {...rest} - containerClassName={cn("relative pl-3 pb-3", containerClassName)} + containerClassName={cn("relative pl-3 pb-3", containerClassName || "")} /> );packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts (1)
36-38: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnsure consistent usage of data types
The function
convertBinaryDataToBase64Stringtakes aUint8Arrayas input, whileconvertBase64StringToBinaryDatareturns aBuffer. For consistency, consider usingUint8Arrayin both functions.Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
-export const convertBase64StringToBinaryData = (document: string): Buffer => Buffer.from(document, "base64"); +export const convertBase64StringToBinaryData = (document: string): Uint8Array => new Uint8Array(Buffer.from(document, "base64"));Likely invalid or redundant comment.
apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py (1)
358-358: Verify consistency of allowed roles in permissionsThe
retrieve_descriptionmethod allows roles[ROLE.ADMIN, ROLE.MEMBER, ROLE.GUEST], while theupdate_descriptionmethod allows only[ROLE.ADMIN, ROLE.MEMBER]. Please verify if this difference in allowed roles is intentional.Also applies to: 382-382
| path( | ||
| "workspaces/<str:slug>/projects/<uuid:project_id>/inbox-issues/<uuid:pk>/description/", | ||
| InboxIssueViewSet.as_view( | ||
| { | ||
| "get": "retrieve_description", | ||
| "post": "update_description", | ||
| } | ||
| ), | ||
| name="inbox-issue-description", | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding OPTIONS method for better API discoverability.
For better API discoverability and to follow REST best practices, consider adding the OPTIONS method to expose the allowed methods and their descriptions.
path(
"workspaces/<str:slug>/projects/<uuid:project_id>/inbox-issues/<uuid:pk>/description/",
InboxIssueViewSet.as_view(
{
"get": "retrieve_description",
"post": "update_description",
+ "options": "description_options"
}
),
name="inbox-issue-description",
),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-read-only-editor.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-read-only-editor.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-editor.tsx (1)
58-58: Consider extracting className to a constant.The className string could be extracted to improve maintainability.
Consider this approach:
+const EDITOR_CONTAINER_CLASS = "relative pl-3 pb-3"; + <CollaborativeRichTextEditorWithRef // ...other props - containerClassName={cn("relative pl-3 pb-3", containerClassName)} + containerClassName={cn(EDITOR_CONTAINER_CLASS, containerClassName)} />web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (1)
102-134: Add error boundary for collaborative editor.The CollaborativeRichTextEditor component handles complex state and network operations. Consider wrapping it in an error boundary to gracefully handle runtime errors and provide fallback UI.
Example implementation:
class EditorErrorBoundary extends React.Component { state = { hasError: false }; static getDerivedStateFromError(error: Error) { return { hasError: true }; } render() { if (this.state.hasError) { return <div className="text-red-600">Failed to load editor. Please refresh the page.</div>; } return this.props.children; } }web/core/services/page/project-page.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
131-142: LGTM! Well-structured binary data handling.The implementation correctly:
- Uses 'application/octet-stream' content type for binary data
- Sets responseType to 'arraybuffer' for proper binary handling
- Follows the service's consistent error handling pattern
- Has proper TypeScript type safety with Promise
Consider implementing caching for the binary descriptions to improve performance and reduce server load during collaborative editing sessions.
web/core/components/pages/editor/page-root.tsx (1)
53-55: Well-structured approach to collaborative editing.The early validation before API calls, combined with the component's architecture (editor refs, version control, and binary description handling), provides a robust foundation for conflict-free collaborative editing. This implementation helps prevent data inconsistencies and race conditions.
Consider adding the following enhancements to further improve the collaborative experience:
- Add a retry mechanism for failed binary description fetches
- Implement optimistic updates to improve perceived performance
- Add conflict resolution indicators in the UI to show when multiple users are editing
web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (1)
376-387: Consider enhancing error handling for binary responses.The implementation looks good, but consider adding specific error handling for binary responses, as they might contain different error formats than JSON responses.
.catch((error) => { - throw error?.response?.data; + // Handle binary error responses + const errorData = error?.response?.data; + throw new Error(errorData instanceof ArrayBuffer + ? 'Failed to fetch description' + : error?.response?.data); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
- apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/settings/common.py (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/providers/custom-collaboration-provider.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx (4 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/core/components/pages/editor/page-root.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/hooks/use-page-fallback.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/services/page/project-page.service.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- apiserver/plane/settings/common.py
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts
- web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx
- web/core/hooks/use-page-fallback.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py
[warning] 773-773: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L773
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 773-773: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L773
The application was found using therequestsmodule without configuring a timeout value for connections.
🔇 Additional comments (24)
web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-editor.tsx (3)
1-20: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.The imports are properly organized and the Props interface correctly extends
ICollaborativeRichTextEditorwith appropriate omissions.
63-63: LGTM! Proper display name setup.Setting the display name is good practice for debugging and component identification in React DevTools.
1-63: Verify collaborative editing integration.Let's ensure all required collaborative editing components and hooks are properly set up.
✅ Verification successful
Collaborative editing integration is properly set up
The verification shows that the collaborative editing system is correctly integrated:
- The component uses the required imports from
@plane/editorpackage, includingCollaborativeRichTextEditorWithRefand necessary types.- All essential hooks are present:
useMentionfor handling mentionsuseUseranduseMemberfor user management- The component is used consistently across the application, appearing in multiple locations including issue descriptions and editors.
- File handling and mention functionality are properly configured through the props interface.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify collaborative editing setup # Test 1: Check for related collaborative components echo "Checking for related collaborative components..." rg -l "CollaborativeRichTextEditor" --type tsx # Test 2: Check for required hooks echo "Checking for required hooks..." rg -l "useMention|useCollaborativeEditor" --type tsx # Test 3: Check for proper imports from @plane/editor echo "Checking for @plane/editor imports..." rg "from\s+['\"]@plane/editor['\"]" --type tsxLength of output: 501
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify collaborative editing setup with correct file type # Test 1: Check for related collaborative components echo "Checking for related collaborative components..." rg -l "CollaborativeRichTextEditor" # Test 2: Check for required hooks echo "Checking for required hooks..." rg -l "useMention|useCollaborativeEditor" # Test 3: Check for proper imports from @plane/editor echo "Checking for @plane/editor imports..." rg "from\s+['\"]@plane/editor['\"]" -A 2Length of output: 20426
web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts (2)
12-15: LGTM! Clean hook initialization with proper typing.The hook follows React best practices with proper argument destructuring and well-typed state management.
51-53: LGTM! Clean state reset implementation.The effect correctly resets the description state when the id changes, following React best practices.
packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (2)
93-97: LGTM! Well-structured interface for collaborative editing.The interface correctly handles binary data using
Uint8Arrayfor collaborative state synchronization, which is ideal for conflict-free collaborative editing as it allows for precise state updates and efficient network transmission.
129-131: LGTM! Clean read-only interface definition.The read-only interface appropriately extends the base props while maintaining consistency with the collaborative editing pattern.
web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Type import is correctly placedThe addition of
TDocumentPayloadtype is properly grouped with other related type imports.
79-112: Architecture aligns well with conflict-free editing requirementsThe binary description methods are well-structured to support conflict-free collaborative editing:
- Use of binary format enables efficient conflict resolution
- Consistent API endpoint pattern maintains service coherence
- ArrayBuffer handling is appropriate for binary data
However, the implementation issues noted in previous reviews still need to be addressed.
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (1)
22-24: Move service instantiation inside the component.The service is still instantiated at the module level, which could lead to shared state across component instances.
web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (3)
66-74: Include dependencies in useCallback hook.The empty dependency array in useCallback could lead to stale closures. The hook uses
resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescriptionandsetIsSubmittingfrom the outer scope.
116-132: Error handling needs improvement.The error handling in the file upload function could be enhanced:
- Console.log usage in production (existing issue)
- Generic error message doesn't provide enough context
57-57: Verify workspace ID handling.The fallback to an empty string for
workspaceIdmight cause issues if child components require a valid workspace ID. Consider throwing an error or handling the undefined workspace case explicitly.web/core/services/page/project-page.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
131-142: Verify consistent binary handling across services.Since this is part of a collaborative editing feature, let's ensure consistent binary handling across related services.
✅ Verification successful
Binary handling is consistent across services
The verification shows consistent implementation patterns across all binary-related endpoints:
- All services use
application/octet-streamcontent type- All implement
responseType: "arraybuffer"- Error handling follows the same pattern with
error?.response?.dataThe implementation in
project-page.service.tsaligns with the established patterns in other services likeissue.service.ts,inbox-issue.service.ts, andlive/src/core/services/page.service.ts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent binary handling patterns across services # Expected results: All binary-related endpoints should use similar headers and response types # Test 1: Check for other binary description endpoints rg -A 5 "Content-Type.*application/octet-stream" --type ts # Test 2: Check for consistent response type handling rg -A 5 "responseType.*arraybuffer" --type ts # Test 3: Look for potential race condition handling ast-grep --pattern 'updateDescription$$$Binary($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 4394
web/core/components/pages/editor/page-root.tsx (1)
53-55: LGTM! Enhanced error handling for missing page ID.The explicit error handling for missing page.id improves the debugging experience by providing a clear error message. This aligns well with the PR's objective of enhancing collaboration features.
Let's verify if similar error handling is consistently implemented across other binary description fetching operations:
✅ Verification successful
Error handling for binary description fetching is consistently implemented
The verification shows that the same error handling pattern is consistently implemented across all files that fetch binary descriptions:
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsxweb/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsxweb/core/components/pages/editor/page-root.tsxweb/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsxEach implementation correctly validates the required fields before making the fetch call, throwing the same descriptive error message.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent error handling in binary description fetching # Expected: Similar error handling patterns in related files # Search for binary description fetch methods ast-grep --pattern 'fetchDescriptionBinary($$$)' # Search for similar error handling patterns rg -A 2 "Required fields missing while fetching binary description"Length of output: 1570
web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx (3)
24-25: Move service instantiation inside the component.The previous review comment about moving the service instantiation inside the component is still valid.
9-9: LGTM!The new imports are appropriate for the added error handling and event tracking functionality.
Also applies to: 21-21
100-100: LGTM!The dependencies array correctly includes all used values in the
issueOperationsmemo.web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM: Clean type import addition.The TDocumentPayload type import is correctly placed and follows the existing import structure.
389-402: Consider implementing optimistic updates and conflict resolution.Since this method handles collaborative editing of descriptions, consider:
- Implementing optimistic updates to improve perceived performance
- Adding version control or timestamps to handle concurrent updates
Let's check if version control is implemented in the API:
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (4)
758-758:⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing permission decorator
The method lacks permission control which could allow unauthorized access.
Apply this diff:
+ @allow_permission([ROLE.ADMIN, ROLE.MEMBER]) def update_description(self, request, slug, project_id, pk):
759-761:⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling for database query
Using
get()without exception handling could raise unhandled exceptions.Apply this diff:
- issue = Issue.issue_objects.get( - workspace__slug=slug, project_id=project_id, pk=pk - ) + try: + issue = Issue.issue_objects.get( + workspace__slug=slug, project_id=project_id, pk=pk + ) + except Issue.DoesNotExist: + return Response( + {"error": "Issue not found"}, + status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND, + )
772-774:⚠️ Potential issueAdd timeout and error handling to external request
The HTTP request lacks timeout and error handling, which could lead to hanging connections.
Apply this diff:
- response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None) + try: + response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None, timeout=5) + except requests.RequestException as e: + return Response( + {"error": "Failed to connect to the external service"}, + status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY, + )🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[warning] 773-773: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L773
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 773-773: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L773
The application was found using therequestsmodule without configuring a timeout value for connections.
783-785:⚠️ Potential issueAdd None check before decoding binary data
Attempting to decode None with base64.b64decode will raise TypeError.
Apply this diff:
- issue.description_binary = base64.b64decode( - response_description_binary - ) + if response_description_binary: + issue.description_binary = base64.b64decode( + response_description_binary + ) + else: + issue.description_binary = None
| mentionHandler={{ | ||
| highlights: mentionHighlights, | ||
| suggestions: mentionSuggestions, | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting mention handler setup to a custom hook.
The mention handler setup could be extracted to improve reusability and reduce coupling.
Consider creating a custom hook:
const useMentionHandler = (workspaceSlug: string, projectId: string, members?: IUserLite[], user?: IUserLite) => {
const { mentionHighlights, mentionSuggestions } = useMention({
workspaceSlug,
projectId,
members,
user,
});
return {
highlights: mentionHighlights,
suggestions: mentionSuggestions,
};
};| fileHandler={getEditorFileHandlers({ | ||
| maxFileSize, | ||
| projectId, | ||
| uploadFile, | ||
| workspaceId, | ||
| workspaceSlug, | ||
| })} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for file upload failures.
The file handler should include error handling for upload failures to provide better user feedback.
Consider wrapping the upload with error handling:
fileHandler={getEditorFileHandlers({
maxFileSize,
projectId,
- uploadFile,
+ uploadFile: async (file: File) => {
+ try {
+ return await uploadFile(file);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Failed to upload file:", error);
+ throw new Error("Failed to upload file. Please try again.");
+ }
+ },
workspaceId,
workspaceSlug,
})}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fileHandler={getEditorFileHandlers({ | |
| maxFileSize, | |
| projectId, | |
| uploadFile, | |
| workspaceId, | |
| workspaceSlug, | |
| })} | |
| fileHandler={getEditorFileHandlers({ | |
| maxFileSize, | |
| projectId, | |
| uploadFile: async (file: File) => { | |
| try { | |
| return await uploadFile(file); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Failed to upload file:", error); | |
| throw new Error("Failed to upload file. Please try again."); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| workspaceId, | |
| workspaceSlug, | |
| })} |
| const resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription = useCallback( | ||
| async (encodedDescription: string, editorRef: EditorRefApi | null) => { | ||
| if (!updateDescription) return; | ||
| try { | ||
| const conflictFreeEncodedDescription = await updateDescription(encodedDescription); | ||
| const decodedDescription = conflictFreeEncodedDescription | ||
| ? new Uint8Array(conflictFreeEncodedDescription) | ||
| : new Uint8Array(); | ||
| editorRef?.setProviderDocument(decodedDescription); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Error while updating description", error); | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| [updateDescription] | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error handling and add null checks.
While basic error handling is present, consider these additional improvements:
- Add null check for editorRef before usage
- Consider propagating the error to parent components
- Add type safety for the error object
const resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription = useCallback(
async (encodedDescription: string, editorRef: EditorRefApi | null) => {
if (!updateDescription) return;
try {
const conflictFreeEncodedDescription = await updateDescription(encodedDescription);
const decodedDescription = conflictFreeEncodedDescription
? new Uint8Array(conflictFreeEncodedDescription)
: new Uint8Array();
+ if (!editorRef) {
+ throw new Error("Editor reference is null");
+ }
- editorRef?.setProviderDocument(decodedDescription);
+ editorRef.setProviderDocument(decodedDescription);
} catch (error) {
- console.error("Error while updating description", error);
+ console.error("Error while updating description:", error);
+ throw error instanceof Error ? error : new Error("Failed to update description");
}
},
[updateDescription]
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription = useCallback( | |
| async (encodedDescription: string, editorRef: EditorRefApi | null) => { | |
| if (!updateDescription) return; | |
| try { | |
| const conflictFreeEncodedDescription = await updateDescription(encodedDescription); | |
| const decodedDescription = conflictFreeEncodedDescription | |
| ? new Uint8Array(conflictFreeEncodedDescription) | |
| : new Uint8Array(); | |
| editorRef?.setProviderDocument(decodedDescription); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error while updating description", error); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| [updateDescription] | |
| ); | |
| const resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription = useCallback( | |
| async (encodedDescription: string, editorRef: EditorRefApi | null) => { | |
| if (!updateDescription) return; | |
| try { | |
| const conflictFreeEncodedDescription = await updateDescription(encodedDescription); | |
| const decodedDescription = conflictFreeEncodedDescription | |
| ? new Uint8Array(conflictFreeEncodedDescription) | |
| : new Uint8Array(); | |
| if (!editorRef) { | |
| throw new Error("Editor reference is null"); | |
| } | |
| editorRef.setProviderDocument(decodedDescription); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error while updating description:", error); | |
| throw error instanceof Error ? error : new Error("Failed to update description"); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| [updateDescription] | |
| ); |
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (descriptionBinary) return; | ||
| // fetch latest binary description | ||
| const fetchDecodedDescription = async () => { | ||
| const encodedDescription = await fetchDescription(); | ||
| let decodedDescription = encodedDescription ? new Uint8Array(encodedDescription) : new Uint8Array(); | ||
| // if there's no binary data present, convert existing HTML string to binary | ||
| if (decodedDescription.length === 0) { | ||
| decodedDescription = getBinaryDataFromRichTextEditorHTMLString(descriptionHTML ?? "<p></p>"); | ||
| } else { | ||
| // decode binary string | ||
| decodedDescription = new Uint8Array(encodedDescription); | ||
| } | ||
| setDescriptionBinary(decodedDescription); | ||
| }; | ||
| fetchDecodedDescription(); | ||
| }, [descriptionBinary, descriptionHTML, fetchDescription]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add cleanup and prevent race conditions in fetch effect.
The current implementation could lead to race conditions if the id changes while a fetch is in progress. Additionally, the effect should clean up if the component unmounts during the fetch.
useEffect(() => {
if (descriptionBinary) return;
- // fetch latest binary description
+ let isSubscribed = true;
const fetchDecodedDescription = async () => {
try {
const encodedDescription = await fetchDescription();
+ if (!isSubscribed) return;
let decodedDescription = encodedDescription ? new Uint8Array(encodedDescription) : new Uint8Array();
// if there's no binary data present, convert existing HTML string to binary
if (decodedDescription.length === 0) {
decodedDescription = getBinaryDataFromRichTextEditorHTMLString(descriptionHTML ?? "<p></p>");
} else {
- // decode binary string
decodedDescription = new Uint8Array(encodedDescription);
}
setDescriptionBinary(decodedDescription);
} catch (error) {
console.error("Failed to fetch description:", error);
+ throw error instanceof Error ? error : new Error("Failed to fetch description");
}
};
fetchDecodedDescription();
+ return () => {
+ isSubscribed = false;
+ };
}, [descriptionBinary, descriptionHTML, fetchDescription]);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| fetchDescription={async () => { | ||
| if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issueId) { | ||
| throw new Error("Required fields missing while fetching binary description"); | ||
| } | ||
| return await issueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId); | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error handling in description operations.
While error messages are added, proper error handling with try-catch blocks is still missing. Also, consider adding loading states for better UX.
Apply this improvement:
fetchDescription={async () => {
if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issueId) {
throw new Error("Required fields missing while fetching binary description");
}
- return await issueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId);
+ try {
+ setIsLoading(true);
+ return await issueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Failed to fetch description:", error);
+ // Consider showing a user-friendly error message
+ throw error;
+ } finally {
+ setIsLoading(false);
+ }
}}
updateDescription={async (data) => {
if (!workspaceSlug || !issue.project_id || !issue.id) {
throw new Error("Required fields missing while updating binary description");
}
- return await issueService.updateDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, issue.project_id, issue.id, {
- description_binary: data,
- });
+ try {
+ setSaving(true);
+ return await issueService.updateDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, issue.project_id, issue.id, {
+ description_binary: data,
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Failed to update description:", error);
+ // Consider showing a user-friendly error message
+ throw error;
+ } finally {
+ setSaving(false);
+ }
}}Also applies to: 103-110
| <IssueDescriptionInput | ||
| key={issue.id} | ||
| containerClassName="-ml-3 border-none" | ||
| descriptionHTML={issue.description_html ?? "<p></p>"} | ||
| disabled={!isEditable} | ||
| fetchDescription={async () => { | ||
| if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issue.id) { | ||
| throw new Error("Required fields missing while fetching binary description"); | ||
| } | ||
| return await inboxIssueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issue.id); | ||
| }} | ||
| updateDescription={async (data) => { | ||
| if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issue.id) { | ||
| throw new Error("Required fields missing while updating binary description"); | ||
| } | ||
| return await inboxIssueService.updateDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issue.id, { | ||
| description_binary: data, | ||
| }); | ||
| }} | ||
| issueId={issue.id} | ||
| issueOperations={issueOperations} | ||
| projectId={issue.project_id} | ||
| setIsSubmitting={(value) => setIsSubmitting(value)} | ||
| workspaceSlug={workspaceSlug} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error handling and add loading state management.
The description input implementation needs improvements in several areas:
- Error handling:
- The thrown errors should be caught and displayed to the user
- Add proper error boundaries or try-catch blocks
- Loading state:
- Add loading indicators during fetch/update operations
- Type safety:
- Add proper typing for the description binary data
Here's how to improve the implementation:
<IssueDescriptionInput
key={issue.id}
containerClassName="-ml-3 border-none"
descriptionHTML={issue.description_html ?? "<p></p>"}
disabled={!isEditable}
+ isLoading={false}
fetchDescription={async () => {
if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issue.id) {
- throw new Error("Required fields missing while fetching binary description");
+ setToast({
+ title: "Error fetching description",
+ message: "Required fields are missing",
+ type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR,
+ });
+ return;
}
- return await inboxIssueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issue.id);
+ try {
+ return await inboxIssueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issue.id);
+ } catch (error) {
+ setToast({
+ title: "Error fetching description",
+ message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : "An error occurred",
+ type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR,
+ });
+ }
}}
updateDescription={async (data) => {
if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issue.id) {
- throw new Error("Required fields missing while updating binary description");
+ setToast({
+ title: "Error updating description",
+ message: "Required fields are missing",
+ type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR,
+ });
+ return;
}
- return await inboxIssueService.updateDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issue.id, {
- description_binary: data,
- });
+ try {
+ return await inboxIssueService.updateDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issue.id, {
+ description_binary: data,
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ setToast({
+ title: "Error updating description",
+ message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : "An error occurred",
+ type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR,
+ });
+ throw error; // Re-throw to handle in the UI
+ }
}}
issueId={issue.id}
issueOperations={issueOperations}
projectId={issue.project_id}
setIsSubmitting={(value) => setIsSubmitting(value)}
workspaceSlug={workspaceSlug}
/>Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| Partial<CompleteCollaborationProviderConfiguration>; | ||
|
|
||
| export class CustomCollaborationProvider { | ||
| public hasSynced: boolean; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hasSynced is never set to true, preventing updates from processing
The hasSynced property is initialized to false and is not updated elsewhere in the code. As a result, the check if (!this.hasSynced) return; in documentUpdateHandler will always return early, and the method will not process any updates. Ensure that hasSynced is set to true at the appropriate time to allow updates to be handled.
Would you like assistance in adjusting the code to properly update hasSynced?
Also applies to: 31-31, 49-49
| return this.configuration.document; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async documentUpdateHandler(_update: Uint8Array, origin: any) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary 'async' modifier in documentUpdateHandler
The documentUpdateHandler method is declared as async but does not contain any await expressions or return a promise. Consider removing the async modifier to simplify the code.
Apply this diff to remove the async keyword:
- async documentUpdateHandler(_update: Uint8Array, origin: any) {
+ documentUpdateHandler(_update: Uint8Array, origin: any) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async documentUpdateHandler(_update: Uint8Array, origin: any) { | |
| documentUpdateHandler(_update: Uint8Array, origin: any) { |
SatishGandham
left a comment
SatishGandham
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As discussed,
- Rename editors
- Explore moving binary as string to the issue detail response itself.
- Show readonly editor while waiting for issue details.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/draft.py (1)
287-292: Consider architectural implications of binary description storage.Since this is part of implementing conflict-free editing, here are some architectural considerations:
- Ensure consistent binary format across all issue types (draft, regular, archived)
- Consider adding a version field to support format evolution
- Plan for data migration if the binary format needs to change
- Consider implementing compression if the binary data grows large
- Add monitoring for binary description sizes to track storage impact
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these architectural improvements?
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/issue.py (1)
735-735: Add documentation and constraints to the description_binary field.The implementation looks good and aligns with the PR's objective of implementing conflict-free issue descriptions. However, consider these improvements:
- description_binary = serializers.CharField() + description_binary = serializers.CharField( + help_text="Binary representation of the issue description for CRDT operations", + max_length=100000, # Adjust based on your requirements + validators=[], # Add custom validators if needed + )Consider adding:
- Documentation through
help_textto explain the field's purpose- A reasonable
max_lengthconstraint to prevent excessive data- Custom validators if the binary data follows a specific format
Also applies to: 742-742
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/draft.py(1 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/serializers/issue.py(1 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/urls/issue.py(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apiserver/plane/app/urls/issue.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/draft.py (1)
287-292: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add constraints and documentation for the binary description field.
While adding the description_binary field is aligned with the PR's objective of supporting conflict-free editing, there are several improvements needed:
- Add max_length constraint to prevent potential memory issues
- Document the expected binary format and purpose
- Add validation for the binary format
- Consider using a more appropriate field type if storing actual binary data
Consider applying these improvements:
- description_binary = serializers.CharField()
+ description_binary = serializers.CharField(
+ max_length=100000, # Adjust based on your requirements
+ help_text="Binary representation of the rich text content for conflict-free editing"
+ )
+
+ def validate_description_binary(self, value):
+ """
+ Validate the binary description format.
+ Add your validation logic here based on the expected format.
+ """
+ # Add validation logic
+ return valueLet's verify if similar binary description fields in other serializers have constraints:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
packages/editor/src/core/types/collaboration-hook.ts (1)
Line range hint
22-34: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The common props type is well-structured and provides a good foundation for different editor variants. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of each property, especially for complex ones like
mentionHandler.+/** + * Common properties shared across all collaborative editor variants + */ type TCollaborativeEditorHookCommonProps = { + /** List of extensions to disable */ disabledExtensions?: TExtensions[]; + /** CSS class name for the editor container */ editorClassName: string; // ... add comments for other properties };packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-editor.ts (1)
Line range hint
32-57: Consider adding connection retry mechanismWhile the error handling is comprehensive, implementing a retry mechanism for failed connections would improve reliability, especially in unstable network conditions.
Consider adding exponential backoff retry logic:
const provider = useMemo( () => new HocuspocusProvider({ name: id, parameters: realtimeConfig.queryParams, token: JSON.stringify(user), url: realtimeConfig.url, + maxRetries: 3, + retryDelay: 1000, // Base delay of 1s with exponential backoff onAuthenticationFailed: () => { serverHandler?.onServerError?.(); setHasServerConnectionFailed(true); },web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (1)
105-127: Consider adding loading states for binary operations.The binary operations for fetching and updating descriptions could benefit from loading states to improve user experience during these potentially slow operations.
<IssueDescriptionInput key={issue.id} containerClassName="-ml-3 border-none" descriptionHTML={issue.description_html ?? "<p></p>"} disabled={disabled} + isLoading={isLoadingDescription} fetchDescription={async () => { if (!workspaceSlug || !issue.project_id || !issue.id) { throw new Error("Required fields missing while fetching binary description"); } + setLoadingDescription(true); + try { return await issueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, issue.project_id, issue.id); + } finally { + setLoadingDescription(false); + } }} updateDescription={async (data) => { if (!workspaceSlug || !issue.project_id || !issue.id) { throw new Error("Required fields missing while updating binary description"); } + setLoadingDescription(true); + try { return await issueService.updateDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, issue.project_id, issue.id, { description_binary: data, }); + } finally { + setLoadingDescription(false); + } }} issueId={issue.id} issueOperations={issueOperations} projectId={issue.project_id} setIsSubmitting={(value) => setIsSubmitting(value)} workspaceSlug={workspaceSlug} />packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (2)
135-139: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The interface is well-structured for collaborative editing, using
Uint8Arrayfor efficient binary state management. The property omissions make sense in the context of real-time collaboration.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of this interface and its properties:
+/** + * Interface for collaborative rich text editor that handles binary state. + * Used for real-time collaboration where multiple users can edit simultaneously. + */ export interface ICollaborativeRichTextEditor extends Omit<IEditorProps, "initialValue" | "onChange" | "value"> { dragDropEnabled?: boolean; + /** Callback when the binary representation of the document changes */ onChange: (updatedDescription: Uint8Array) => void; + /** Binary representation of the current document state */ value: Uint8Array; }
170-172: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The type definition is minimal and correctly structured for read-only collaborative content viewing.
Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of this type:
+/** + * Type for read-only view of collaborative rich text content. + * Used for displaying binary state without editing capabilities. + */ export type ICollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor = Omit<IReadOnlyEditorProps, "initialValue"> & { + /** Binary representation of the document state to display */ value: Uint8Array; };web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (1)
123-123: Consider memoizing the default description value.The nullish coalescing operation
?? "<p></p>"could cause unnecessary re-renders if the description toggles between null and empty. Consider memoizing this value or moving it to a constant.+const DEFAULT_DESCRIPTION = "<p></p>"; + <IssueDescriptionInput key={issue.id} containerClassName="-ml-3 border-none" - descriptionHTML={issue.description_html ?? "<p></p>"} + descriptionHTML={issue.description_html ?? DEFAULT_DESCRIPTION}web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx (1)
Line range hint
124-138: Fix incorrect event tracking state in error case.The event tracking in the error case incorrectly reports a "SUCCESS" state. This should be "FAILED" to accurately reflect the operation status.
captureIssueEvent({ eventName: "Inbox issue updated", - payload: { state: "SUCCESS", element: "Inbox" }, + payload: { state: "FAILED", element: "Inbox" }, updates: { changed_property: Object.keys(data).join(","), change_details: Object.values(data).join(","), }, path: pathname, });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
apiserver/plane/app/urls/issue.py(2 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py(3 hunks)apiserver/plane/settings/common.py(1 hunks)packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-editor.tsx(2 hunks)packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/editor-wrapper.tsx(2 hunks)packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-editor.ts(2 hunks)packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-read-only-editor.ts(2 hunks)packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts(4 hunks)packages/editor/src/core/types/collaboration-hook.ts(3 hunks)packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts(2 hunks)packages/editor/src/index.ts(2 hunks)web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx(4 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts(2 hunks)web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- apiserver/plane/app/urls/issue.py
- apiserver/plane/settings/common.py
- packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-editor.tsx
- packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/editor-wrapper.tsx
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-read-only-editor.ts
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts
- packages/editor/src/index.ts
- web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts
🔇 Additional comments (21)
packages/editor/src/core/types/collaboration-hook.ts (3)
44-48: LGTM! Well-structured read-only props.
Good job on restricting the fileHandler to only getAssetSrc for read-only mode. This ensures proper separation of concerns.
49-57: Add error handling for binary data operations.
Using Uint8Array for value storage suggests CRDT or similar conflict resolution strategy. Consider:
- Adding validation for the binary format
- Implementing error handling for malformed data
- Including version/format metadata
Line range hint 35-43: Consider making onTransaction required for collaborative editing.
In a collaborative editor, tracking transactions is crucial for maintaining consistency. Making onTransaction optional might lead to missed updates or synchronization issues.
Consider:
- Making
onTransactionrequired - Adding validation for transaction handling in the implementation
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-document-editor.ts (4)
12-12: LGTM! Type naming improvement
The updated type name TCollaborativeDocumentEditorHookProps better reflects the hook's specific purpose for document editing.
Line range hint 14-31: LGTM! Enhanced naming clarity
The hook's new name useCollaborativeDocumentEditor better communicates its specific purpose for document editing, improving code readability and maintainability.
Line range hint 59-73: LGTM! Proper resource cleanup
The implementation ensures proper cleanup of both the provider and IndexedDB persistence, preventing memory leaks and resource issues.
Line range hint 75-107: Verify provider document synchronization
While passing providerDocument explicitly is clearer, we should ensure the provider is fully initialized before the editor starts using it.
Consider adding a check for provider readiness:
const editor = useEditor({
id,
onTransaction,
editorProps,
editorClassName,
enableHistory: false,
+ enabled: provider.status === 'connected',
extensions: [
// ... existing extensions
],
providerDocument: provider.document,
tabIndex,
});Let's verify the provider implementation:
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (2)
15-17: Move service instantiation inside the component.
The service is still instantiated at the module level, which can impact testing and memory management.
109-114: Improved error handling for fetch operation.
The error handling has been enhanced with specific error messages, which is better than the previous silent returns.
packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (1)
135-139: Verify implementation consistency across components.
The collaborative interfaces are well-designed. Let's verify their implementation in related components.
Also applies to: 170-172
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Implementation is consistent across collaborative components
The collaborative interfaces are properly implemented with consistent Uint8Array usage:
- Interface definitions in
editor.tscorrectly specify binary data handling - Conversion utilities in
yjs-utils.tsproperly handle HTML-to-binary transformations - Hooks and providers maintain type consistency for binary state
- All components use the same binary data format for collaborative operations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent implementation of collaborative interfaces
# Test 1: Find components implementing ICollaborativeRichTextEditor
echo "Components implementing ICollaborativeRichTextEditor:"
rg -l "ICollaborativeRichTextEditor" --type ts --type tsx
# Test 2: Find components implementing ICollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor
echo -e "\nComponents implementing ICollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor:"
rg -l "ICollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor" --type ts --type tsx
# Test 3: Verify Uint8Array usage in these components
echo -e "\nVerifying Uint8Array usage in components:"
rg "Uint8Array" --type ts --type tsx -C 2
Length of output: 604
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach without file type restrictions
# Find files containing ICollaborativeRichTextEditor
echo "Files containing ICollaborativeRichTextEditor:"
rg -l "ICollaborativeRichTextEditor"
# Find files containing Uint8Array
echo -e "\nFiles containing Uint8Array usage:"
rg -l "Uint8Array"
# Show detailed context of Uint8Array usage
echo -e "\nDetailed Uint8Array usage context:"
rg "Uint8Array" -C 2
Length of output: 149381
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of collaborative interfaces
# Find collaborative editor implementations
echo "Collaborative editor implementations:"
rg -A 5 "class.*CollaborativeRichTextEditor"
# Check for Uint8Array usage in collaborative components
echo -e "\nUint8Array handling in collaborative components:"
rg -A 3 "onChange.*Uint8Array" --type ts
# Check for any potential inconsistencies in binary data handling
echo -e "\nBinary data conversion methods:"
rg -A 3 "getBinaryDataFrom.*" --type ts
Length of output: 3545
web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (3)
7-7: LGTM!
The import is correctly placed and properly used in the new method.
393-404: LGTM!
The implementation correctly handles binary data with proper content type and response type specifications. Error handling is consistent with the service pattern.
406-419: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using PUT instead of POST for idempotent operations.
Since this is an update operation where the same payload always results in the same state, using PUT would be more semantically correct than POST.
Apply this diff to improve the HTTP method:
- return this.post(`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/issues/${issueId}/description/`, data, {
+ return this.put(`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/issues/${issueId}/description/`, data, {apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (8)
732-756: Enhance error handling and response consistency.
The implementation needs the following improvements:
- Use
get_object_or_404or proper exception handling for the database query - Use
status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUNDconstant instead of literal 404 - Consider using a more specific Content-Type header based on the binary data type
744-749: Refactor duplicate stream_data function.
The stream_data function is duplicated in both methods. Consider extracting it to a private method.
758-758: Add missing permission decorator to 'update_description' method.
The update_description method lacks an @allow_permission decorator, which may allow unauthorized access.
759-761: Handle exceptions when retrieving the issue.
Using get() without handling DoesNotExist exceptions can lead to unhandled exceptions if the issue does not exist.
763-767: Avoid unnecessary base64 encoding if data is already in string format.
The variable base64_description might already be a base64-encoded string. Re-encoding it can lead to data corruption.
773-774: Specify a timeout for the requests.post call and add exception handling.
The requests.post call needs:
- A timeout to prevent hanging connections
- Exception handling for network failures
775-785: Handle potential errors when parsing JSON response and check for None.
The implementation needs:
- Exception handling for JSON parsing
- None check before decoding
response_description_binary
788-793: Refactor duplicate stream_data function.
The stream_data function is duplicated in both methods. Consider extracting it to a private method.
| export type TCollaborativeDocumentEditorHookProps = TCollaborativeEditorHookProps & { | ||
| embedHandler?: TEmbedConfig; | ||
| realtimeConfig: TRealtimeConfig; | ||
| serverHandler?: TServerHandler; | ||
| user: TUserDetails; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export type TCollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorHookProps = TCollaborativeReadOnlyEditorHookProps & { | ||
| realtimeConfig: TRealtimeConfig; | ||
| serverHandler?: TServerHandler; | ||
| user: TUserDetails; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate embedHandler property.
The embedHandler property in TCollaborativeDocumentEditorHookProps is already included in the base type TCollaborativeEditorHookProps. This duplication is unnecessary and might cause confusion.
export type TCollaborativeDocumentEditorHookProps = TCollaborativeEditorHookProps & {
- embedHandler?: TEmbedConfig;
realtimeConfig: TRealtimeConfig;
serverHandler?: TServerHandler;
user: TUserDetails;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type TCollaborativeDocumentEditorHookProps = TCollaborativeEditorHookProps & { | |
| embedHandler?: TEmbedConfig; | |
| realtimeConfig: TRealtimeConfig; | |
| serverHandler?: TServerHandler; | |
| user: TUserDetails; | |
| }; | |
| export type TCollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorHookProps = TCollaborativeReadOnlyEditorHookProps & { | |
| realtimeConfig: TRealtimeConfig; | |
| serverHandler?: TServerHandler; | |
| user: TUserDetails; | |
| }; | |
| export type TCollaborativeDocumentEditorHookProps = TCollaborativeEditorHookProps & { | |
| realtimeConfig: TRealtimeConfig; | |
| serverHandler?: TServerHandler; | |
| user: TUserDetails; | |
| }; | |
| export type TCollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorHookProps = TCollaborativeReadOnlyEditorHookProps & { | |
| realtimeConfig: TRealtimeConfig; | |
| serverHandler?: TServerHandler; | |
| user: TUserDetails; | |
| }; |
| }, | ||
| }), | ||
| [inboxIssue] | ||
| [captureIssueEvent, inboxIssue, pathname] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing dependencies to useMemo.
The dependencies array is missing removeIssue and archiveIssue which are used within the issueOperations object. This could lead to stale closure issues where the operations might use outdated references.
- [captureIssueEvent, inboxIssue, pathname]
+ [captureIssueEvent, inboxIssue, pathname, removeIssue, archiveIssue]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| [captureIssueEvent, inboxIssue, pathname] | |
| [captureIssueEvent, inboxIssue, pathname, removeIssue, archiveIssue] |
| <IssueDescriptionInput | ||
| key={issue.id} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary key prop to prevent data loss.
Using the issue ID as a key will force the component to remount when the ID changes, potentially causing loss of unsaved user input. The component already handles internal state based on the issue ID, making this key unnecessary.
<IssueDescriptionInput
- key={issue.id}
containerClassName="-ml-3 border-none"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <IssueDescriptionInput | |
| key={issue.id} | |
| <IssueDescriptionInput | |
| containerClassName="-ml-3 border-none" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts (4)
9-14: Consider adding more specific type definitions.While the
updateDescriptionreturn type is well-defined, we can further improve type safety:
descriptionBinaryshould be typed asBase64Stringto be more specific- Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the expected format of each parameter
+// Type alias for base64 encoded strings +type Base64String = string; + +/** + * @param descriptionBinary - Base64 encoded string of the binary description + * @param descriptionHTML - HTML string of the description + * @param id - Unique identifier for the issue + * @param updateDescription - Function to update the description and resolve conflicts + */ type TArgs = { - descriptionBinary: string | null; + descriptionBinary: Base64String | null; descriptionHTML: string | null; id: string; updateDescription?: (data: string) => Promise<ArrayBuffer>; };
37-51: Remove debug console.log statements.Production code should not contain debug logging statements. Remove the following:
- Line 41:
console.log("Saved", savedDescriptionBuffer);- Line 47:
console.log("HTML");useEffect(() => { if (descriptionBinary) return; if (savedDescriptionBinary) { const savedDescriptionBuffer = convertBase64StringToBinaryData(savedDescriptionBinary); - console.log("Saved", savedDescriptionBuffer); const decodedSavedDescription = savedDescriptionBuffer ? new Uint8Array(savedDescriptionBuffer) : new Uint8Array(); setDescriptionBinary(decodedSavedDescription); } else { - console.log("HTML"); const decodedDescriptionHTML = getBinaryDataFromRichTextEditorHTMLString(descriptionHTML ?? "<p></p>"); setDescriptionBinary(decodedDescriptionHTML); } }, [descriptionBinary, descriptionHTML, savedDescriptionBinary]);
53-59: Clean up commented code and debug logs.Remove:
- The commented out effect (lines 53-56)
- The debug log statement on line 58
This improves code maintainability and removes noise from the codebase.
- // useEffect(() => { - // console.log("Setting to null"); - // setDescriptionBinary(null); - // }, [id]); - - console.log("descriptionBinary", descriptionBinary); -
60-64: Add explicit return type definition.Consider adding an explicit return type to improve type safety and documentation.
+type UseIssueDescriptionReturn = { + descriptionBinary: Uint8Array | null; + resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription: ( + encodedDescription: string, + editorRef: EditorRefApi | null + ) => Promise<void>; +}; + -export const useIssueDescription = (args: TArgs) => { +export const useIssueDescription = (args: TArgs): UseIssueDescriptionReturn => {packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.ts (1)
53-53: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The addition of
description_binaryas an optional string property is correct and aligns with the PR's objective of implementing conflict-free issue descriptions.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and format of the binary description:
+ /** Binary representation of the issue description for conflict-free collaborative editing */ description_binary?: string;web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (1)
105-132: Consider implementing an error boundary for description handling.While the error handling for async operations has been improved, the component could benefit from an error boundary to gracefully handle and display errors to users when description operations fail.
Here's a suggested implementation:
// Create an error boundary component class DescriptionErrorBoundary extends React.Component< { children: React.ReactNode }, { hasError: boolean; error: Error | null } > { constructor(props: { children: React.ReactNode }) { super(props); this.state = { hasError: false, error: null }; } static getDerivedStateFromError(error: Error) { return { hasError: true, error }; } render() { if (this.state.hasError) { return ( <div className="text-red-600 p-2"> Failed to load description. Please try again later. </div> ); } return this.props.children; } } // Wrap the IssueDescriptionInput with the error boundary {issue.description_binary !== undefined && ( <DescriptionErrorBoundary> <IssueDescriptionInput // ... existing props ... /> </DescriptionErrorBoundary> )}web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (1)
104-146: Consider adding error boundaries around the editors.The collaborative editors are complex components that could potentially throw errors. Adding error boundaries would prevent editor crashes from affecting the entire issue view.
import { Component, ErrorInfo, ReactNode } from 'react'; class EditorErrorBoundary extends Component< { children: ReactNode }, { hasError: boolean } > { state = { hasError: false }; static getDerivedStateFromError() { return { hasError: true }; } componentDidCatch(error: Error, errorInfo: ErrorInfo) { // Log the error to your error reporting service } render() { if (this.state.hasError) { return ( <div className="p-4 text-red-600"> Failed to load editor. Please refresh the page. </div> ); } return this.props.children; } }Wrap the editors with the error boundary:
{!disabled ? ( + <EditorErrorBoundary> <CollaborativeRichTextEditor // ... props /> + </EditorErrorBoundary> ) : ( + <EditorErrorBoundary> <CollaborativeRichTextReadOnlyEditor // ... props /> + </EditorErrorBoundary> )}packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts (1)
20-29: Avoid using 'document' as a parameter name to prevent confusion with the global objectThe parameter name
documentmight cause confusion with the globaldocumentobject in browser environments. Consider renaming it toinitialDocumentordocDatafor clarity and to prevent potential conflicts.Apply this diff to rename the parameter:
-export const applyUpdates = (document: Uint8Array, updates?: Uint8Array): Uint8Array => { +export const applyUpdates = (initialDocument: Uint8Array, updates?: Uint8Array): Uint8Array => { const yDoc = new Y.Doc(); - Y.applyUpdate(yDoc, document); + Y.applyUpdate(yDoc, initialDocument); if (updates) { Y.applyUpdate(yDoc, updates); } const encodedDoc = Y.encodeStateAsUpdate(yDoc); return encodedDoc; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts(1 hunks)packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.ts(1 hunks)web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts(1 hunks)web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts
🔇 Additional comments (11)
web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts (1)
16-19: LGTM! Clean hook initialization.
The hook initialization follows React best practices with proper typing and state management.
packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.ts (1)
Line range hint 53-61: Verify consistent property usage across components.
The new description_binary property appears to be part of a larger change involving multiple services. Let's verify its consistent implementation across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as I have sufficient information to verify the consistent implementation of the description_binary property across the codebase.
Property implementation is consistent across the codebase
The description_binary property is consistently implemented across the codebase:
- Type definition in
packages/types/src/issues/issue.d.tsas an optional string property - Proper handling in services:
web/core/services/issue/issue.service.tsweb/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts
- Consistent usage in components:
- Issue store:
web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts - Issue detail components:
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx - Main content:
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx
- Issue store:
- Related methods
fetchDescriptionBinaryandupdateDescriptionBinaryare properly implemented in the respective services
The implementation is complete and consistent across all necessary parts of the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistent usage of description_binary property
# Expected: Find all related implementations and type usages
echo "Searching for description_binary usage in TypeScript/JavaScript files..."
rg "description_binary" -t ts -t js
echo "\nSearching for related service methods mentioned in the AI summary..."
rg "fetchDescriptionBinary|updateDescriptionBinary" -t ts -t js
echo "\nChecking for any potential type imports of TIssue..."
rg "import.*TIssue.*from" -t ts -t js
Length of output: 28791
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (2)
15-19: Skip comment about service instantiation.
A previous review already covered the recommendation to move the service instantiation inside the component.
105-132: Implementation aligns well with conflict-free description objectives.
The code effectively implements conflict-free issue descriptions with:
- Proper handling of binary and HTML descriptions
- Clear separation of fetch and update operations
- Type-safe props and operations
- Appropriate error handling
web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (4)
29-29: Specify more precise return types for async functions.
Using Promise<ArrayBuffer> would be more precise than the implicit return type.
Also applies to: 36-36
68-76: Add cleanup for debounced function.
The debounced save function should be cleaned up when the component unmounts.
131-131: Use a centralized logging service instead of console.log.
Replace console.log with a proper logging service for better error tracking.
79-100: Great implementation of the loading state UI!
The skeleton loader provides an excellent user experience while waiting for the description to load. The varying widths and layout closely match the actual content structure.
packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts (3)
51-59: Duplicate Comment: Add error handling for invalid HTML input
66-74: Duplicate Comment: Add error handling for invalid HTML input
81-103: Duplicate Comment: Ensure proper error handling when processing binary data
Also applies to: 110-132
| const debouncedDescriptionSave = useCallback( | ||
| debounce(async (updatedDescription: Uint8Array) => { | ||
| const editor = editorRef.current; | ||
| if (!editor) return; | ||
| const encodedDescription = convertBinaryDataToBase64String(updatedDescription); | ||
| await resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription(encodedDescription, editor); | ||
| setIsSubmitting("submitted"); | ||
| }, 1500), | ||
| [handleSubmit, issueId] | ||
| [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update dependency array for useCallback.
The empty dependency array could cause stale closures. Consider adding the required dependencies:
const debouncedDescriptionSave = useCallback(
debounce(async (updatedDescription: Uint8Array) => {
const editor = editorRef.current;
if (!editor) return;
const encodedDescription = convertBinaryDataToBase64String(updatedDescription);
await resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription(encodedDescription, editor);
setIsSubmitting("submitted");
}, 1500),
- []
+ [resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription, setIsSubmitting]
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const debouncedDescriptionSave = useCallback( | |
| debounce(async (updatedDescription: Uint8Array) => { | |
| const editor = editorRef.current; | |
| if (!editor) return; | |
| const encodedDescription = convertBinaryDataToBase64String(updatedDescription); | |
| await resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription(encodedDescription, editor); | |
| setIsSubmitting("submitted"); | |
| }, 1500), | |
| [handleSubmit, issueId] | |
| [] | |
| const debouncedDescriptionSave = useCallback( | |
| debounce(async (updatedDescription: Uint8Array) => { | |
| const editor = editorRef.current; | |
| if (!editor) return; | |
| const encodedDescription = convertBinaryDataToBase64String(updatedDescription); | |
| await resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription(encodedDescription, editor); | |
| setIsSubmitting("submitted"); | |
| }, 1500), | |
| [resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription, setIsSubmitting] | |
| ); |
| export const convertBinaryDataToBase64String = (document: Uint8Array): string => | ||
| Buffer.from(document).toString("base64"); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace Node.js 'Buffer' with browser-compatible alternatives
The use of Buffer is specific to Node.js and may not be available in browser environments where this code is likely to run. To ensure compatibility, consider using browser-native methods for encoding and decoding base64 strings.
Apply this diff to replace Buffer with browser-compatible code:
For convertBinaryDataToBase64String:
-export const convertBinaryDataToBase64String = (document: Uint8Array): string =>
- Buffer.from(document).toString("base64");
+export const convertBinaryDataToBase64String = (document: Uint8Array): string => {
+ let binary = '';
+ const len = document.byteLength;
+ for (let i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ binary += String.fromCharCode(document[i]);
+ }
+ return btoa(binary);
+};For convertBase64StringToBinaryData:
-export const convertBase64StringToBinaryData = (document: string): ArrayBuffer => Buffer.from(document, "base64");
+export const convertBase64StringToBinaryData = (document: string): Uint8Array => {
+ const binaryString = atob(document);
+ const len = binaryString.length;
+ const bytes = new Uint8Array(len);
+ for (let i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ bytes[i] = binaryString.charCodeAt(i);
+ }
+ return bytes;
+};Also applies to: 44-45
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apiserver/plane/app/serializers/issue.py (1)
750-762: LGTM! Consider adding field documentation.The integration of
description_binaryfield is well-implemented. Consider adding docstring documentation to explain:
- The purpose and usage of the binary description
- Expected format and size limits
- Relationship with the existing description field
Add this documentation:
class IssueDetailSerializer(IssueSerializer): + """ + Serializer for detailed issue representation including binary description support. + + The description_binary field allows storing and retrieving rich-text content in binary format, + which helps maintain formatting and prevents conflicts during collaborative editing. + """ description_html = serializers.CharField() description_binary = Base64BinaryField() is_subscribed = serializers.BooleanField(read_only=True)
sriramveeraghanta
force-pushed
the
preview
branch
from
6667327 to
0cd36b8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (2)
120-120: Consider adding type safety for description_binary.The condition
description_binary !== undefinedwould benefit from TypeScript type narrowing.-{issue.description_binary !== undefined && ( +{(issue.description_binary !== undefined && issue.description_binary !== null) && (
141-146: Consider grouping related props.The props passed to
IssueDescriptionInputcould be better organized by grouping related props together.-issueId={issue.id} -issueOperations={issueOperations} -projectId={issue.project_id} -setIsSubmitting={(value) => setIsSubmitting(value)} -workspaceSlug={workspaceSlug} +// Group identifiers +workspaceSlug={workspaceSlug} +projectId={issue.project_id} +issueId={issue.id} +// Group operations +issueOperations={issueOperations} +setIsSubmitting={(value) => setIsSubmitting(value)}web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx (2)
Line range hint
120-134: Fix inconsistent event tracking in error handling.The error handler logs a success event despite the operation failing. This will lead to inaccurate analytics data.
Apply this diff to fix the event tracking:
} catch { setToast({ title: "Issue update failed", type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, message: "Issue update failed", }); captureIssueEvent({ eventName: "Inbox issue updated", - payload: { state: "SUCCESS", element: "Inbox" }, + payload: { state: "FAILED", element: "Inbox" }, updates: { changed_property: Object.keys(data).join(","), change_details: Object.values(data).join(","), }, path: pathname, }); }
185-186: Improve conditional rendering logic for description input.Using an undefined check on
description_binarymight cause UI flickering if the value is temporarily undefined during data fetching. Consider using a more robust condition or loading state.Consider this alternative approach:
- {issue.description_binary !== undefined && ( + {issue && (This ensures the description input is rendered as long as we have an issue object, preventing unnecessary re-renders and potential UI flickering.
web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts (1)
29-29: Enhance method documentation for clarity.The comment should better explain the binary nature of the description and its purpose in conflict resolution.
- updateIssueDescription: (descriptionBinary: string) => Promise<ArrayBuffer>; // updating the local issue description + updateIssueDescription: (descriptionBinary: string) => Promise<ArrayBuffer>; // updates issue description in binary format for conflict-free collaborative editing
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx(6 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts(1 hunks)web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (1)
25-29: LGTM! Import changes align with new functionality.
The new imports for duplicate issues hook and issue service are correctly placed and organized.
web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts (2)
82-82: LGTM! Proper MobX action registration.
The method is correctly registered as a MobX action, following best practices for state management.
185-192: Verify service implementation for conflict resolution.
The code calls updateDescriptionBinary on the service layer. Let's verify that the service properly handles concurrent updates.
✅ Verification successful
Conflict resolution is handled at the API level
Based on the findings:
- The frontend service correctly implements binary description updates through the
/description/endpoint - The API endpoint uses a conflict resolution service at
settings.LIVE_BASE_URL/resolve-document-conflicts/ - The implementation follows the PR's objective of conflict-free issue descriptions by:
- Using binary format for descriptions
- Delegating conflict resolution to a dedicated service
- Handling concurrent updates through the resolve-document-conflicts endpoint
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the service implementation to verify conflict handling
echo "Searching for InboxIssueService implementation..."
rg -l "class InboxIssueService"
echo "Searching for updateDescriptionBinary implementation..."
rg "updateDescriptionBinary.*description_binary.*" -A 5
Length of output: 368
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the service implementation more precisely
echo "Checking InboxIssueService implementation..."
cat web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts
# Also search for any related tests that might reveal conflict handling
echo -e "\nSearching for related test files..."
fd "inbox-issue.*test|inbox-issue.*spec"
Length of output: 4814
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the API endpoint implementation since the service is just a wrapper
echo "Searching for inbox issues description endpoint implementation..."
rg -g "*.py" "inbox-issues.*description" -B 2 -A 5
# Also check for any conflict handling middleware or decorators
echo -e "\nSearching for conflict handling decorators or middleware..."
rg -g "*.py" "class.*Lock|@.*lock|conflict|concurrent" -B 1 -A 3
Length of output: 16471
| fetchDescription={async () => { | ||
| if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issueId) { | ||
| throw new Error("Required fields missing while fetching binary description"); | ||
| } | ||
| return await issueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId); | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and add loading states.
While error messages are good, the description operations would benefit from proper error handling and loading states for better UX.
+const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
+const [isSaving, setSaving] = useState(false);
fetchDescription={async () => {
if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issueId) {
throw new Error("Required fields missing while fetching binary description");
}
try {
+ setIsLoading(true);
return await issueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId);
} catch (error) {
+ console.error("Failed to fetch description:", error);
+ throw error;
+ } finally {
+ setIsLoading(false);
}
}}
updateDescription={async (data) => {
if (!workspaceSlug || !issue.project_id || !issue.id) {
throw new Error("Required fields missing while updating binary description");
}
try {
+ setSaving(true);
return await issueService.updateDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, issue.project_id, issue.id, {
description_binary: data,
});
} catch (error) {
+ console.error("Failed to update description:", error);
+ throw error;
+ } finally {
+ setSaving(false);
}
}}Also applies to: 133-140
| updateIssueDescription = async (descriptionBinary: string): Promise<ArrayBuffer> => { | ||
| const inboxIssue = clone(this.issue); | ||
| try { | ||
| if (!this.issue.id) throw new Error("Issue id is missing"); | ||
| set(this.issue, "description_binary", descriptionBinary); | ||
| const res = await this.inboxIssueService.updateDescriptionBinary( | ||
| this.workspaceSlug, | ||
| this.projectId, | ||
| this.issue.id, | ||
| { | ||
| description_binary: descriptionBinary, | ||
| } | ||
| ); | ||
| // fetching activity | ||
| this.fetchIssueActivity(); | ||
| return res; | ||
| } catch { | ||
| set(this.issue, "description_binary", inboxIssue.description_binary); | ||
| throw new Error("Failed to update local issue description"); | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and input validation.
Several improvements could enhance the robustness of this method:
- The error message doesn't match the actual error condition (line 198).
- Activity fetching errors are silently ignored.
- Missing input validation for
descriptionBinary.
Consider this improved implementation:
updateIssueDescription = async (descriptionBinary: string): Promise<ArrayBuffer> => {
const inboxIssue = clone(this.issue);
+ if (typeof descriptionBinary !== 'string') {
+ throw new Error('Description must be a string');
+ }
try {
if (!this.issue.id) throw new Error("Issue id is missing");
set(this.issue, "description_binary", descriptionBinary);
const res = await this.inboxIssueService.updateDescriptionBinary(
this.workspaceSlug,
this.projectId,
this.issue.id,
{
description_binary: descriptionBinary,
}
);
- // fetching activity
- this.fetchIssueActivity();
+ try {
+ await this.fetchIssueActivity();
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch activity after description update:', error);
+ }
return res;
} catch {
set(this.issue, "description_binary", inboxIssue.description_binary);
- throw new Error("Failed to update local issue description");
+ throw new Error("Failed to update issue description");
}
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| updateIssueDescription = async (descriptionBinary: string): Promise<ArrayBuffer> => { | |
| const inboxIssue = clone(this.issue); | |
| try { | |
| if (!this.issue.id) throw new Error("Issue id is missing"); | |
| set(this.issue, "description_binary", descriptionBinary); | |
| const res = await this.inboxIssueService.updateDescriptionBinary( | |
| this.workspaceSlug, | |
| this.projectId, | |
| this.issue.id, | |
| { | |
| description_binary: descriptionBinary, | |
| } | |
| ); | |
| // fetching activity | |
| this.fetchIssueActivity(); | |
| return res; | |
| } catch { | |
| set(this.issue, "description_binary", inboxIssue.description_binary); | |
| throw new Error("Failed to update local issue description"); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| updateIssueDescription = async (descriptionBinary: string): Promise<ArrayBuffer> => { | |
| const inboxIssue = clone(this.issue); | |
| if (typeof descriptionBinary !== 'string') { | |
| throw new Error('Description must be a string'); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| if (!this.issue.id) throw new Error("Issue id is missing"); | |
| set(this.issue, "description_binary", descriptionBinary); | |
| const res = await this.inboxIssueService.updateDescriptionBinary( | |
| this.workspaceSlug, | |
| this.projectId, | |
| this.issue.id, | |
| { | |
| description_binary: descriptionBinary, | |
| } | |
| ); | |
| try { | |
| await this.fetchIssueActivity(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to fetch activity after description update:', error); | |
| } | |
| return res; | |
| } catch { | |
| set(this.issue, "description_binary", inboxIssue.description_binary); | |
| throw new Error("Failed to update issue description"); | |
| } | |
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
live/src/core/resolve-conflicts.ts (2)
8-17: Enhance type definitions with documentation and stricter types.The types could be improved for better type safety and documentation:
Consider applying these changes:
+/** + * Request body for resolving conflicts between documents + * @property original_document - Base64 encoded string of the original document + * @property updates - Base64 encoded string of the updates to apply + */ export type TResolveConflictsRequestBody = { original_document: string; updates: string; }; +/** + * Response containing the resolved document in multiple formats + * @property description_binary - Base64 encoded binary format + * @property description_html - HTML string representation + * @property description - JSON representation of the document + */ export type TResolveConflictsResponse = { description_binary: string; description_html: string; - description: object; + description: Record<string, unknown>; };
19-49: Document the conflict resolution strategy.The code would benefit from documentation explaining the conflict resolution approach.
Add JSDoc comments:
+/** + * Resolves conflicts between an original document and updates in a rich text editor. + * + * The conflict resolution strategy: + * 1. For empty original documents, creates a new document from updates + * 2. For existing documents, uses operational transformation to merge updates + * + * @param body - Contains base64 encoded original document and updates + * @returns The resolved document in binary, HTML, and JSON formats + * @throws Error if the input validation fails or conflict resolution fails + */ export const resolveDocumentConflicts = (body: TResolveConflictsRequestBody): TResolveConflictsResponse => {packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts (1)
44-46: Enhance error handling for sync failures.Currently, sync errors are only logged to console. Consider implementing proper error handling with user feedback and recovery mechanisms.
} catch (error) { console.error("Error applying binary updates to the description", error); + // Notify user about sync failure + props.onError?.(error); + // Attempt recovery by requesting fresh data + props.onSyncFailed?.(); }live/src/server.ts (2)
63-63: Add runtime type validation for request bodyThe type assertion
as TResolveConflictsRequestBodyonly provides compile-time type checking. Consider adding runtime validation using a schema validation library like Zod or Joi for better type safety.Example implementation with Zod:
import { z } from 'zod'; const ResolveConflictsSchema = z.object({ original_document: z.string(), updates: z.array(z.unknown()) }); const payload = ResolveConflictsSchema.safeParse(req.body); if (!payload.success) { return res.status(400).json({ message: "Invalid request body", errors: payload.error.errors }); }
71-72: Consider adding response type definitionThe resolved document structure should be explicitly typed for better maintainability and type safety.
interface ResolvedDocumentResponse { binary: string; html: string; json: unknown; } const resolvedDocument: ResolvedDocumentResponse = resolveDocumentConflicts(req.body);web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (1)
105-105: Consider strengthening the existence check.The current check
description_binary !== undefinedmight missnullvalues. Consider using a more robust check.- {issue.description_binary !== undefined && ( + {issue.description_binary != null && (web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (1)
77-98: Consider extracting the loading skeleton into a separate component.The loading skeleton UI is well-structured but could be moved to a separate component to improve maintainability and reusability.
+const IssueDescriptionSkeleton: FC = () => ( + <Loader className="min-h-[120px] max-h-64 space-y-2 overflow-hidden rounded-md"> + <Loader.Item width="100%" height="26px" /> + <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> + <Loader.Item width="26px" height="26px" /> + <Loader.Item width="400px" height="26px" /> + </div> + {/* ... rest of the skeleton UI ... */} + </Loader> +); export const IssueDescriptionInput: FC<IssueDescriptionInputProps> = observer((props) => { // ... - if (!descriptionBinary) - return ( - <Loader className="min-h-[120px] max-h-64 space-y-2 overflow-hidden rounded-md"> - {/* ... skeleton UI ... */} - </Loader> - ); + if (!descriptionBinary) return <IssueDescriptionSkeleton />;web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (2)
25-29: Consider using a custom hook for duplicate issues detection.The duplicate issues functionality could be better encapsulated in a dedicated custom hook that handles both the debounced logic and the service calls. This would improve code organization and reusability.
// Example implementation const useIssueDeduplication = ( workspaceSlug: string | undefined, projectId: string | undefined, issue: Issue | undefined ) => { const { duplicateIssues, isLoading, error } = useDebouncedDuplicateIssues( workspaceSlug, projectId, { name: issue?.name, description_html: getTextContent(issue?.description_html), issueId: issue?.id, } ); return { duplicateIssues, isLoading, error }; };
120-144: Enhance type safety for description operations.While the implementation looks good, consider adding TypeScript types for the binary description data to improve type safety and developer experience.
type DescriptionBinary = { // Define the structure based on your binary description format version: number; content: unknown; }; type DescriptionInputProps = { descriptionBinary: DescriptionBinary | null; descriptionHTML: string; // ... other props }; // Usage <IssueDescriptionInput descriptionBinary={issue.description_binary as DescriptionBinary} // ... other props />web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx (5)
80-80: Remove empty fetch method or implement functionality.The
fetchmethod is currently empty and serves no purpose. Either implement the required functionality or remove it.
137-143: Enhance error handling in updateDescription.The error handling could be more informative and consistent with other operations:
updateDescription: async (_workspaceSlug, _projectId, _issueId, descriptionBinary) => { try { return await inboxIssue.updateIssueDescription(descriptionBinary); } catch { - throw new Error("Failed to update issue description"); + const error = new Error("Failed to update issue description"); + setToast({ + title: "Error", + message: "Failed to update issue description", + type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, + }); + throw error; } },
Line range hint
108-136: Fix inconsistent event tracking in update method.The failure case is incorrectly tracking the event as "SUCCESS".
} catch { setToast({ title: "Issue update failed", type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, message: "Issue update failed", }); captureIssueEvent({ eventName: "Inbox issue updated", - payload: { state: "SUCCESS", element: "Inbox" }, + payload: { state: "FAILED", element: "Inbox" }, updates: { changed_property: Object.keys(data).join(","), change_details: Object.values(data).join(","), }, path: pathname, }); }
192-192: Simplify description rendering condition.The condition
issue.description_binary !== undefinedmight be too strict. Consider using a null check instead, as undefined check could miss cases where the value is null.-{issue.description_binary !== undefined && ( +{issue.description_binary != null && (
199-204: Enhance error handling in fetchDescription.The error handling could be more informative and consistent with other operations:
fetchDescription={async () => { if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issue.id) { - throw new Error("Required fields missing while fetching binary description"); + const error = new Error("Required fields missing while fetching binary description"); + setToast({ + title: "Error", + message: "Required fields are missing for fetching description", + type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, + }); + throw error; } - return await inboxIssueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issue.id); + try { + return await inboxIssueService.fetchDescriptionBinary(workspaceSlug, projectId, issue.id); + } catch (error) { + setToast({ + title: "Error", + message: "Failed to fetch description", + type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, + }); + throw error; + } }}web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/root.tsx (1)
29-34: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The type definition for
updateDescriptionis well-structured and consistent with other operations. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and parameters of this method, especially explaining the binary format expectations./** * Updates the issue description with conflict resolution support * @param workspaceSlug - The workspace identifier * @param projectId - The project identifier * @param issueId - The issue identifier * @param descriptionBinary - The binary representation of the description * @returns Promise resolving to ArrayBuffer containing the updated description */ updateDescription: ( workspaceSlug: string, projectId: string, issueId: string, descriptionBinary: string ) => Promise<ArrayBuffer>;web/core/store/issue/issue-details/root.store.ts (1)
260-265: Consider adding JSDoc for the new method.The
updateIssueDescriptionimplementation looks good and aligns with the PR objective of implementing conflict-free descriptions. However, consider adding JSDoc to document the binary format of the description parameter.+ /** + * Updates the issue description using a binary string format for conflict-free collaborative editing. + * @param workspaceSlug - The workspace identifier + * @param projectId - The project identifier + * @param issueId - The issue identifier + * @param descriptionBinary - The description in binary format for conflict resolution + */ updateIssueDescription = async ( workspaceSlug: string, projectId: string, issueId: string, descriptionBinary: string ) => this.issue.updateIssueDescription(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
live/src/core/resolve-conflicts.ts(1 hunks)live/src/server.ts(4 hunks)packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-rich-text-editor.ts(1 hunks)web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx(9 hunks)web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/root.tsx(4 hunks)web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts(3 hunks)web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts(5 hunks)web/core/store/issue/issue-details/root.store.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts
🔇 Additional comments (18)
live/src/core/resolve-conflicts.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM: Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-organized and specific to the required functionality.
19-49: Verify integration with @plane/editor package.
The code heavily relies on the @plane/editor package's functions. Let's verify their usage.
✅ Verification successful
Integration with @plane/editor package is correctly implemented
The code correctly uses the functions from @plane/editor package:
applyUpdates: Properly handles Yjs document updates with correct parameter typesconvertBase64StringToBinaryData: Correctly used for base64 to binary conversiongetAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData: Properly integrated to generate all required document formats
The implementation in resolve-conflicts.ts follows the expected usage patterns and matches the function signatures defined in packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the imported functions from @plane/editor
# Expected: Find function definitions and their usage patterns
# Search for function definitions
echo "Searching for function definitions in @plane/editor..."
fd -e ts -e js . | xargs rg "export.*(applyUpdates|convertBase64StringToBinaryData|getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData)"
# Search for other usages of these functions
echo "Searching for other usage patterns..."
rg "import.*@plane/editor.*\b(applyUpdates|convertBase64StringToBinaryData|getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData)\b"
Length of output: 881
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation details of these functions
# Check the implementation of applyUpdates
echo "Checking applyUpdates implementation..."
rg -A 10 "export const applyUpdates" packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts
# Check getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData implementation
echo "Checking getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData implementation..."
rg -A 15 "export const getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData" packages/editor/src/core/helpers/yjs-utils.ts
# Check if there are any other files using these functions
echo "Checking other usages..."
rg "\b(applyUpdates|convertBase64StringToBinaryData|getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData)\b" --type ts
Length of output: 2940
live/src/server.ts (2)
13-14: LGTM: Clean import additions
The new imports are well-organized and properly typed with TypeScript interfaces.
62-79: Verify binary data handling in conflict resolution
Please ensure that the conflict resolution flow properly handles binary data encoding/decoding.
✅ Verification successful
Binary data handling is properly implemented
The code correctly handles binary data encoding/decoding using Node.js Buffer APIs with proper base64 conversion. The implementation in yjs-utils.ts follows best practices:
- Uses
Buffer.from()with proper input validation - Handles both encoding (to base64) and decoding (from base64) paths
- No memory leaks as Buffer objects are properly scoped and garbage collected
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for binary data handling in the conflict resolution implementation
rg -A 5 "binary.*encode|encode.*binary|Buffer\."
# Check for potential memory leaks in binary data handling
ast-grep --pattern 'Buffer.from($$$).toString($$$)'
Length of output: 126774
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (2)
17-19: Service instantiation issue remains.
The previous review comment about moving the service instantiation inside the component is still valid.
113-121: Great improvement in error handling!
The error handling has been significantly improved with descriptive error messages, which is better than the previous silent returns.
web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (1)
38-65: LGTM! Well-structured component initialization.
The component initialization is clean and follows React best practices with proper store integration and hook usage.
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx (1)
120-144: Implementation successfully supports conflict-free descriptions.
The changes effectively implement conflict-free issue descriptions by:
- Using binary format for description storage
- Implementing proper null checks
- Providing clear error messages
- Maintaining proper separation of concerns
The implementation aligns well with the PR objective of enhancing collaboration within rich-text editors.
web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts (3)
29-29: LGTM! Well-documented interface method.
The method signature is clear and appropriate for handling binary description updates.
82-82: LGTM! Proper MobX action registration.
The method is correctly registered as an action in makeObservable, ensuring proper state management.
180-198:
Improve error handling and state management consistency.
The implementation has several issues that need attention:
- State updates should follow the rollback pattern used in other methods
- Error handling needs improvement
- Missing input validation
Consider this improved implementation:
updateIssueDescription = async (descriptionBinary: string): Promise<ArrayBuffer> => {
+ if (!descriptionBinary) {
+ throw new Error("Description binary is required");
+ }
+
+ const previousDescription = this.issue.description_binary;
+
try {
if (!this.issue.id) throw new Error("Issue id is missing");
+
+ // Update local state first
+ set(this.issue, "description_binary", descriptionBinary);
+
+ // Make API call
const res = await this.inboxIssueService.updateDescriptionBinary(
this.workspaceSlug,
this.projectId,
this.issue.id,
{
description_binary: descriptionBinary,
}
);
- set(this.issue, "description_binary", descriptionBinary);
- // fetching activity
- this.fetchIssueActivity();
+
+ // Update activity after successful API call
+ try {
+ await this.fetchIssueActivity();
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Failed to fetch activity after description update:", error);
+ }
+
return res;
} catch (error) {
- throw new Error("Failed to update local issue description");
+ // Rollback on failure
+ set(this.issue, "description_binary", previousDescription);
+ throw new Error(`Failed to update issue description: ${error.message}`);
}
};This implementation:
- Follows the store's rollback pattern for consistency
- Adds input validation
- Improves error handling and messages
- Properly handles activity fetch errors
Let's verify the rollback pattern usage in other methods:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the error handling patterns in this file.
Let me try one more search to check the error handling patterns with a corrected regex:
Rollback pattern implementation needs revision
Based on the codebase patterns, the suggested implementation needs adjustment. The store consistently uses:
runInActionfor state updates- Object-based rollbacks instead of single property rollbacks
- Error handling without re-throwing errors (except in
fetchIssueActivity)
Here's the corrected suggestion:
updateIssueDescription = async (descriptionBinary: string): Promise<ArrayBuffer> => {
if (!descriptionBinary) {
throw new Error("Description binary is required");
}
- const previousDescription = this.issue.description_binary;
+ const previousData = {
+ description_binary: this.issue.description_binary
+ };
try {
if (!this.issue.id) throw new Error("Issue id is missing");
- // Update local state first
- set(this.issue, "description_binary", descriptionBinary);
-
// Make API call
const res = await this.inboxIssueService.updateDescriptionBinary(
this.workspaceSlug,
this.projectId,
this.issue.id,
{
description_binary: descriptionBinary,
}
);
+
+ runInAction(() => {
+ set(this.issue, "description_binary", descriptionBinary);
+ });
- // Update activity after successful API call
- try {
- await this.fetchIssueActivity();
- } catch (error) {
- console.error("Failed to fetch activity after description update:", error);
- }
+ // Fetch activity (errors handled within the method)
+ this.fetchIssueActivity();
return res;
} catch (error) {
- // Rollback on failure
- set(this.issue, "description_binary", previousDescription);
- throw new Error(`Failed to update issue description: ${error.message}`);
+ runInAction(() => {
+ set(this.issue, "description_binary", previousData.description_binary);
+ });
+ console.error("Failed to update issue description:", error);
}
};🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify rollback pattern usage in other methods
# Expected: Find similar patterns of storing previous state and rolling back on error
rg -A 5 "const.*previous" "web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts"
Length of output: 560
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check error handling patterns in the file
rg -B 2 -A 5 "catch.*{" "web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts"
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check state updates before/after API calls
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
$$$
await $_.$$$(
$$$
);
set($_, $_, $_);
$$$
}'
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check activity fetch patterns
rg -B 2 -A 2 "fetchIssueActivity" "web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts"
Length of output: 1077
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check error handling patterns with corrected regex
rg -B 5 -A 3 "} catch" "web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts"
Length of output: 2171
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check state update patterns
rg -B 3 -A 3 "set\(this\.issue" "web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts"
Length of output: 1294
web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx (1)
162-162: LGTM! Dependencies array is complete.
All required dependencies for the useMemo hook are now properly included.
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx (3)
42-42: LGTM: Hook import for issue description updates
The addition of updateIssueDescription hook aligns with the PR objective and follows the codebase conventions.
96-102: LGTM: Clean integration with existing operations
The new updateDescription method is well-integrated into the issueOperations object, following the established patterns and properly memoized.
96-102: Verify conflict resolution behavior
While the implementation adds description update capability, we should verify that it properly handles concurrent updates to prevent conflicts.
Let's check for any existing conflict resolution logic:
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/root.tsx (2)
73-73: LGTM!
The updateIssueDescription hook is correctly imported and follows the established pattern.
334-334: LGTM!
The updateIssueDescription dependency is correctly added to the useMemo dependency array.
web/core/store/issue/issue-details/root.store.ts (1)
195-195: Verify the store hierarchy change impact.
The change from this to rootStore in IssueStore initialization looks good as it provides access to the global state needed for conflict resolution. However, let's verify that all dependent components are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the findings and generate additional verification scripts to understand the impact better.
The results show multiple IssueStore instantiations with different patterns. I need to verify their implementations to ensure the change is consistent with the codebase architecture.
Let me analyze the findings and generate the final response since we have enough information.
The store hierarchy change is safe and consistent with the codebase architecture
The change from this to rootStore in IssueStore initialization is correct and doesn't require any additional updates because:
- The
web/core/store/issue/issue-details/root.store.tsfile is correctly passing therootStoreparameter toIssueStore. - Other instances of
IssueStoreinitialization in the codebase are correctly using their respective store hierarchies:- In
space/core/store/root.store.ts, it usesthisas it's the root store itself - In
web/core/store/issue/root.store.ts, it uses no parameters as it's a standalone store
- In
The change aligns with the store's architecture where each store instance is aware of its position in the hierarchy and receives the appropriate store reference.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining direct references to IssueStore that might need updating
# Search for IssueStore instantiations
rg "new IssueStore\(" --type ts
# Search for potential circular dependencies
rg "import.*IssueStore" --type ts
Length of output: 3515
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of IssueStore in space and web to understand the constructor parameters
ast-grep --pattern 'class IssueStore {
$$$
constructor($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check the implementation details of the stores
cat space/core/store/root.store.ts
cat web/core/store/issue/issue-details/root.store.ts
cat web/core/store/issue/root.store.ts
Length of output: 30455
| export const resolveDocumentConflicts = (body: TResolveConflictsRequestBody): TResolveConflictsResponse => { | ||
| const { original_document, updates } = body; | ||
| try { | ||
| // convert from base64 to buffer | ||
| const originalDocumentBuffer = original_document ? convertBase64StringToBinaryData(original_document) : null; | ||
| const updatesBuffer = updates ? convertBase64StringToBinaryData(updates) : null; | ||
| // decode req.body | ||
| const decodedOriginalDocument = originalDocumentBuffer ? new Uint8Array(originalDocumentBuffer) : new Uint8Array(); | ||
| const decodedUpdates = updatesBuffer ? new Uint8Array(updatesBuffer) : new Uint8Array(); | ||
| // resolve conflicts | ||
| let resolvedDocument: Uint8Array; | ||
| if (decodedOriginalDocument.length === 0) { | ||
| // use updates to create the document id original_description is null | ||
| resolvedDocument = applyUpdates(decodedUpdates); | ||
| } else { | ||
| // use original document and updates to resolve conflicts | ||
| resolvedDocument = applyUpdates(decodedOriginalDocument, decodedUpdates); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const { contentBinaryEncoded, contentHTML, contentJSON } = | ||
| getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData(resolvedDocument); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| description_binary: contentBinaryEncoded, | ||
| description_html: contentHTML, | ||
| description: contentJSON, | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw new Error("Internal server error"); | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling and add input validation.
The current implementation has several areas that could be improved:
- The generic error message masks the actual error, making debugging difficult
- No validation for base64 input strings
- Large documents could cause memory issues
Consider applying these improvements:
export const resolveDocumentConflicts = (body: TResolveConflictsRequestBody): TResolveConflictsResponse => {
const { original_document, updates } = body;
+
+ // Validate base64 inputs
+ const isBase64 = (str: string): boolean => {
+ try {
+ return btoa(atob(str)) === str;
+ } catch {
+ return false;
+ }
+ };
+
+ if (original_document && !isBase64(original_document)) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid base64 string for original_document");
+ }
+ if (!isBase64(updates)) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid base64 string for updates");
+ }
+
try {
// convert from base64 to buffer
const originalDocumentBuffer = original_document ? convertBase64StringToBinaryData(original_document) : null;
const updatesBuffer = updates ? convertBase64StringToBinaryData(updates) : null;
+
+ // Check document size limits
+ const MAX_SIZE = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10MB
+ if (updatesBuffer && updatesBuffer.byteLength > MAX_SIZE) {
+ throw new Error("Updates exceed maximum allowed size");
+ }
+
// decode req.body
const decodedOriginalDocument = originalDocumentBuffer ? new Uint8Array(originalDocumentBuffer) : new Uint8Array();
const decodedUpdates = updatesBuffer ? new Uint8Array(updatesBuffer) : new Uint8Array();
+
// resolve conflicts
let resolvedDocument: Uint8Array;
if (decodedOriginalDocument.length === 0) {
- // use updates to create the document id original_description is null
+ // If no original document exists, create new document from updates
resolvedDocument = applyUpdates(decodedUpdates);
} else {
- // use original document and updates to resolve conflicts
+ // Merge updates into the original document using operational transformation
resolvedDocument = applyUpdates(decodedOriginalDocument, decodedUpdates);
}
const { contentBinaryEncoded, contentHTML, contentJSON } =
getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData(resolvedDocument);
return {
description_binary: contentBinaryEncoded,
description_html: contentHTML,
description: contentJSON,
};
} catch (error) {
- throw new Error("Internal server error");
+ // Preserve error details for debugging while providing a clean message
+ console.error("Document conflict resolution failed:", error);
+ throw new Error(
+ error instanceof Error
+ ? `Failed to resolve conflicts: ${error.message}`
+ : "Internal server error"
+ );
}
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const resolveDocumentConflicts = (body: TResolveConflictsRequestBody): TResolveConflictsResponse => { | |
| const { original_document, updates } = body; | |
| try { | |
| // convert from base64 to buffer | |
| const originalDocumentBuffer = original_document ? convertBase64StringToBinaryData(original_document) : null; | |
| const updatesBuffer = updates ? convertBase64StringToBinaryData(updates) : null; | |
| // decode req.body | |
| const decodedOriginalDocument = originalDocumentBuffer ? new Uint8Array(originalDocumentBuffer) : new Uint8Array(); | |
| const decodedUpdates = updatesBuffer ? new Uint8Array(updatesBuffer) : new Uint8Array(); | |
| // resolve conflicts | |
| let resolvedDocument: Uint8Array; | |
| if (decodedOriginalDocument.length === 0) { | |
| // use updates to create the document id original_description is null | |
| resolvedDocument = applyUpdates(decodedUpdates); | |
| } else { | |
| // use original document and updates to resolve conflicts | |
| resolvedDocument = applyUpdates(decodedOriginalDocument, decodedUpdates); | |
| } | |
| const { contentBinaryEncoded, contentHTML, contentJSON } = | |
| getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData(resolvedDocument); | |
| return { | |
| description_binary: contentBinaryEncoded, | |
| description_html: contentHTML, | |
| description: contentJSON, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error("Internal server error"); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| export const resolveDocumentConflicts = (body: TResolveConflictsRequestBody): TResolveConflictsResponse => { | |
| const { original_document, updates } = body; | |
| // Validate base64 inputs | |
| const isBase64 = (str: string): boolean => { | |
| try { | |
| return btoa(atob(str)) === str; | |
| } catch { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| if (original_document && !isBase64(original_document)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid base64 string for original_document"); | |
| } | |
| if (!isBase64(updates)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid base64 string for updates"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| // convert from base64 to buffer | |
| const originalDocumentBuffer = original_document ? convertBase64StringToBinaryData(original_document) : null; | |
| const updatesBuffer = updates ? convertBase64StringToBinaryData(updates) : null; | |
| // Check document size limits | |
| const MAX_SIZE = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10MB | |
| if (updatesBuffer && updatesBuffer.byteLength > MAX_SIZE) { | |
| throw new Error("Updates exceed maximum allowed size"); | |
| } | |
| // decode req.body | |
| const decodedOriginalDocument = originalDocumentBuffer ? new Uint8Array(originalDocumentBuffer) : new Uint8Array(); | |
| const decodedUpdates = updatesBuffer ? new Uint8Array(updatesBuffer) : new Uint8Array(); | |
| // resolve conflicts | |
| let resolvedDocument: Uint8Array; | |
| if (decodedOriginalDocument.length === 0) { | |
| // If no original document exists, create new document from updates | |
| resolvedDocument = applyUpdates(decodedUpdates); | |
| } else { | |
| // Merge updates into the original document using operational transformation | |
| resolvedDocument = applyUpdates(decodedOriginalDocument, decodedUpdates); | |
| } | |
| const { contentBinaryEncoded, contentHTML, contentJSON } = | |
| getAllDocumentFormatsFromRichTextEditorBinaryData(resolvedDocument); | |
| return { | |
| description_binary: contentBinaryEncoded, | |
| description_html: contentHTML, | |
| description: contentJSON, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| // Preserve error details for debugging while providing a clean message | |
| console.error("Document conflict resolution failed:", error); | |
| throw new Error( | |
| error instanceof Error | |
| ? `Failed to resolve conflicts: ${error.message}` | |
| : "Internal server error" | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| }; |
| const editor = useEditor({ | ||
| id, | ||
| editorProps, | ||
| editorClassName, | ||
| enableHistory: false, | ||
| extensions: [ | ||
| SideMenuExtension({ | ||
| aiEnabled: false, | ||
| dragDropEnabled: true, | ||
| }), | ||
| HeadingListExtension, | ||
| Collaboration.configure({ | ||
| document: provider.document, | ||
| }), | ||
| ...(extensions ?? []), | ||
| ], | ||
| fileHandler, | ||
| handleEditorReady, | ||
| forwardedRef, | ||
| mentionHandler, | ||
| placeholder, | ||
| providerDocument: provider.document, | ||
| tabIndex, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add cleanup for the collaboration provider.
The provider should be properly cleaned up when the hook unmounts to prevent memory leaks and stale connections.
Add a cleanup effect:
+useEffect(() => {
+ return () => {
+ provider.destroy();
+ };
+}, [provider]);
const editor = useEditor({
// ... existing configuration
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const editor = useEditor({ | |
| id, | |
| editorProps, | |
| editorClassName, | |
| enableHistory: false, | |
| extensions: [ | |
| SideMenuExtension({ | |
| aiEnabled: false, | |
| dragDropEnabled: true, | |
| }), | |
| HeadingListExtension, | |
| Collaboration.configure({ | |
| document: provider.document, | |
| }), | |
| ...(extensions ?? []), | |
| ], | |
| fileHandler, | |
| handleEditorReady, | |
| forwardedRef, | |
| mentionHandler, | |
| placeholder, | |
| providerDocument: provider.document, | |
| tabIndex, | |
| }); | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| return () => { | |
| provider.destroy(); | |
| }; | |
| }, [provider]); | |
| const editor = useEditor({ | |
| id, | |
| editorProps, | |
| editorClassName, | |
| enableHistory: false, | |
| extensions: [ | |
| SideMenuExtension({ | |
| aiEnabled: false, | |
| dragDropEnabled: true, | |
| }), | |
| HeadingListExtension, | |
| Collaboration.configure({ | |
| document: provider.document, | |
| }), | |
| ...(extensions ?? []), | |
| ], | |
| fileHandler, | |
| handleEditorReady, | |
| forwardedRef, | |
| mentionHandler, | |
| placeholder, | |
| providerDocument: provider.document, | |
| tabIndex, | |
| }); |
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (provider.hasSynced) return; | ||
| if (value && value.length > 0) { | ||
| try { | ||
| Y.applyUpdate(provider.document, value); | ||
| provider.hasSynced = true; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Error applying binary updates to the description", error); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, [value, provider.document]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving the sync state management.
The hasSynced flag is mutated inside the effect but not tracked in dependencies, which could lead to inconsistent behavior if value changes after initial sync. Consider using state to track sync status.
+const [hasSynced, setHasSynced] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
- if (provider.hasSynced) return;
+ if (hasSynced) return;
if (value && value.length > 0) {
try {
Y.applyUpdate(provider.document, value);
- provider.hasSynced = true;
+ setHasSynced(true);
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error applying binary updates to the description", error);
}
}
-}, [value, provider.document]);
+}, [value, provider.document, hasSynced]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (provider.hasSynced) return; | |
| if (value && value.length > 0) { | |
| try { | |
| Y.applyUpdate(provider.document, value); | |
| provider.hasSynced = true; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error applying binary updates to the description", error); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, [value, provider.document]); | |
| const [hasSynced, setHasSynced] = useState(false); | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (hasSynced) return; | |
| if (value && value.length > 0) { | |
| try { | |
| Y.applyUpdate(provider.document, value); | |
| setHasSynced(true); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error applying binary updates to the description", error); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, [value, provider.document, hasSynced]); |
| app.post("/resolve-document-conflicts", (req, res) => { | ||
| const { original_document, updates } = req.body as TResolveConflictsRequestBody; | ||
| try { | ||
| if (original_document === undefined || updates === undefined) { | ||
| res.status(400).send({ | ||
| message: "Missing required fields", | ||
| }); | ||
| throw new Error("Missing required fields"); | ||
| } | ||
| const resolvedDocument = resolveDocumentConflicts(req.body); | ||
| res.status(200).json(resolvedDocument); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("error", error); | ||
| res.status(500).send({ | ||
| message: "Internal server error", | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Move the endpoint into the router for consistency
The endpoint is currently defined outside the router, which means it won't be under the /live base path like other endpoints. This breaks API URL structure consistency.
Apply this diff to fix the routing structure:
-app.post("/resolve-document-conflicts", (req, res) => {
+router.post("/resolve-document-conflicts", (req, res) => {
// ... existing implementation ...
});
app.use(process.env.LIVE_BASE_PATH || "/live", router);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| uploadFile={async (file) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const { asset_id } = await fileService.uploadProjectAsset( | ||
| workspaceSlug, | ||
| projectId, | ||
| { | ||
| entity_identifier: issueId, | ||
| entity_type: EFileAssetType.ISSUE_DESCRIPTION, | ||
| }, | ||
| file | ||
| ); | ||
| return asset_id; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.log("Error in uploading issue asset:", error); | ||
| throw new Error("Asset upload failed. Please try again later."); | ||
| } | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement error boundary for file upload failures.
While the try-catch block handles immediate errors, implementing an error boundary would provide a more robust error handling strategy for the file upload functionality.
// Create a new file: components/error-boundaries/file-upload-error-boundary.tsx
import React, { Component, ErrorInfo } from 'react';
interface Props {
children: React.ReactNode;
onError?: (error: Error) => void;
}
interface State {
hasError: boolean;
error?: Error;
}
export class FileUploadErrorBoundary extends Component<Props, State> {
constructor(props: Props) {
super(props);
this.state = { hasError: false };
}
static getDerivedStateFromError(error: Error): State {
return { hasError: true, error };
}
componentDidCatch(error: Error, errorInfo: ErrorInfo) {
this.props.onError?.(error);
}
render() {
if (this.state.hasError) {
return (
<div className="text-red-600">
Failed to upload file. Please try again.
</div>
);
}
return this.props.children;
}
}Wrap the editor component with the error boundary:
return (
<>
{!disabled ? (
+ <FileUploadErrorBoundary
+ onError={(error) => {
+ // Handle error logging here
+ }}
+ >
<CollaborativeRichTextEditor
// ... existing props ...
/>
+ </FileUploadErrorBoundary>
) : (
// ... read-only editor ...
)}
</>
);| updateDescription: async (workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| return await updateIssueDescription(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary); | ||
| } catch { | ||
| throw new Error("Failed to update issue description"); | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and type safety
The new updateDescription method needs improvements in several areas:
- The generic error handling loses the original error context
- The
descriptionBinaryparameter lacks proper typing - The error message could be more informative
Consider applying these improvements:
- updateDescription: async (workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary) => {
+ updateDescription: async (
+ workspaceSlug: string,
+ projectId: string,
+ issueId: string,
+ descriptionBinary: Uint8Array | null
+ ) => {
try {
return await updateIssueDescription(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary);
- } catch {
- throw new Error("Failed to update issue description");
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(
+ `Failed to update issue description: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error'}`
+ );
}
},Also, consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the method's purpose and parameters:
/**
* Updates the binary description of an issue
* @param workspaceSlug - The workspace identifier
* @param projectId - The project identifier
* @param issueId - The issue identifier
* @param descriptionBinary - The binary content of the description
* @throws Error if the update fails
* @returns Promise resolving to the updated issue
*/| updateDescription: async (workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| return await updateIssueDescription(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary); | ||
| } catch { | ||
| throw new Error("Failed to update issue description"); | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and add event tracking.
The implementation should follow the pattern established by other operations in the component:
- Add loading/success/error toasts
- Include event tracking
- Provide more detailed error information
updateDescription: async (workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary) => {
try {
- return await updateIssueDescription(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary);
+ const updatePromise = updateIssueDescription(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary);
+ setPromiseToast(updatePromise, {
+ loading: "Updating issue description...",
+ success: {
+ title: "Success!",
+ message: "Issue description updated successfully",
+ },
+ error: {
+ title: "Error!",
+ message: "Failed to update issue description",
+ },
+ });
+ const result = await updatePromise;
+ captureIssueEvent({
+ eventName: ISSUE_UPDATED,
+ payload: { issueId, state: "SUCCESS", element: "Issue detail page" },
+ updates: {
+ changed_property: "description",
+ change_details: "Updated description",
+ },
+ path: pathname,
+ });
+ return result;
} catch (error) {
+ captureIssueEvent({
+ eventName: ISSUE_UPDATED,
+ payload: { state: "FAILED", element: "Issue detail page" },
+ updates: {
+ changed_property: "description",
+ change_details: "Failed to update",
+ },
+ path: pathname,
+ });
throw new Error("Failed to update issue description");
}
},Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| descriptionBinary={issue.description_binary} | ||
| descriptionHTML={issue.description_html ?? "<p></p>"} | ||
| disabled={disabled} | ||
| fetchDescription={async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this still required?
| try { | ||
| return await updateIssueDescription(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary); | ||
| } catch { | ||
| throw new Error("Failed to update issue description"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are we catching this error some where and showing the error to user?
…ict-free-issue-description
…keplane/plane into chore/conflict-free-issue-description
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py (2)
374-380: Improve content type specificationThe content type should be more specific for binary data streaming.
Apply this diff:
- stream_data(), content_type="application/octet-stream" + stream_data(), content_type="application/x-binary"
404-431: Simplify response handling logicThe response handling could be simplified and made more robust.
Apply this diff:
- if response.status_code == 200: - issue.description = response.json().get( - "description", issue.description - ) - issue.description_html = response.json().get("description_html") - response_description_binary = response.json().get( - "description_binary" - ) - issue.description_binary = base64.b64decode( - response_description_binary - ) - issue.save() - - def stream_data(): - if issue.description_binary: - yield issue.description_binary - else: - yield b"" - - response = StreamingHttpResponse( - stream_data(), content_type="application/octet-stream" - ) - response["Content-Disposition"] = ( - 'attachment; filename="issue_description.bin"' - ) - return response - - return Response(status=status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR) + if response.status_code != 200: + return Response( + {"error": "Failed to resolve conflicts"}, + status=status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR + ) + + response_data = response.json() + issue.description = response_data.get("description", issue.description) + issue.description_html = response_data.get("description_html", issue.description_html) + + if description_binary := response_data.get("description_binary"): + issue.description_binary = base64.b64decode(description_binary) + + issue.save() + + response = StreamingHttpResponse( + (yield from [issue.description_binary or b""]), + content_type="application/x-binary" + ) + response["Content-Disposition"] = 'attachment; filename="issue_description.bin"' + return responseapiserver/plane/app/views/intake/base.py (1)
697-724: Consider adding error details from external serviceWhen the external service returns a non-200 status code, it would be helpful to include any error details in the response.
Apply this diff:
if response.status_code == 200: issue.description = response.json().get( "description", issue.description ) issue.description_html = response.json().get("description_html") response_description_binary = response.json().get( "description_binary" ) issue.description_binary = base64.b64decode( response_description_binary ) issue.save() def stream_data(): if issue.description_binary: yield issue.description_binary else: yield b"" response = StreamingHttpResponse( stream_data(), content_type="application/octet-stream" ) response["Content-Disposition"] = ( 'attachment; filename="issue_description.bin"' ) return response - return Response(status=status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR) + return Response( + {"error": f"External service error: {response.text}"}, + status=status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR + )apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (1)
794-799: Extract duplicate stream_data function to a private method.The
stream_datafunction is duplicated in both methods.Apply this diff to reduce code duplication:
+ def _stream_binary_data(self, binary_data): + def stream_data(): + if binary_data: + yield binary_data + else: + yield b"" + return stream_data def retrieve_description(self, request, slug, project_id, pk): # ... existing code ... response = StreamingHttpResponse( - stream_data(), content_type="application/octet-stream" + self._stream_binary_data(binary_data)(), + content_type="application/octet-stream" ) def update_description(self, request, slug, project_id, pk): # ... existing code ... response = StreamingHttpResponse( - stream_data(), content_type="application/octet-stream" + self._stream_binary_data(issue.description_binary)(), + content_type="application/octet-stream" )Also applies to: 744-749
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apiserver/plane/app/views/intake/base.py(3 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py(3 hunks)apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py(3 hunks)apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0085_intake_intakeissue_remove_inboxissue_created_by_and_more.py(0 hunks)apiserver/plane/space/urls/intake.py(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0085_intake_intakeissue_remove_inboxissue_created_by_and_more.py
- apiserver/plane/space/urls/intake.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
apiserver/plane/app/views/intake/base.py
[warning] 690-690: apiserver/plane/app/views/intake/base.py#L690
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 690-690: apiserver/plane/app/views/intake/base.py#L690
The application was found using the requests module without configuring a timeout value for connections.
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py
[warning] 774-774: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L774
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 774-774: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L774
The application was found using the requests module without configuring a timeout value for connections.
apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py
[warning] 397-397: apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py#L397
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 397-397: apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py#L397
The application was found using the requests module without configuring a timeout value for connections.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py (1)
3-4: LGTM: Required imports added
The new imports are correctly added and all are being used by the new functionality.
Also applies to: 12-12, 23-23
apiserver/plane/app/views/intake/base.py (2)
647-671: LGTM! Well-implemented description retrieval.
The implementation correctly handles permissions, null checks, and efficiently streams the binary data.
675-677:
Add exception handling for Issue.DoesNotExist
Using get() without exception handling can result in a 500 Internal Server Error if the issue doesn't exist.
Apply this diff:
- issue = Issue.objects.get(
- workspace__slug=slug, project_id=project_id, pk=pk
- )
+ try:
+ issue = Issue.objects.get(
+ workspace__slug=slug, project_id=project_id, pk=pk
+ )
+ except Issue.DoesNotExist:
+ return Response(
+ {"error": "Issue not found"},
+ status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND
+ )Likely invalid or redundant comment.
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py (2)
758-758:
Add permission decorator to protect the endpoint.
The method lacks permission control which could allow unauthorized access.
Apply this diff:
+ @allow_permission([ROLE.ADMIN, ROLE.MEMBER])
def update_description(self, request, slug, project_id, pk):Likely invalid or redundant comment.
781-791:
Add error handling for JSON parsing and None values.
The code needs to handle JSON parsing errors and None values safely.
Apply this diff:
if response.status_code == 200:
+ try:
+ response_data = response.json()
+ except ValueError:
+ return Response(
+ {"error": "Invalid JSON response from external service"},
+ status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY,
+ )
+
issue.description = response.json().get(
"description", issue.description
)
issue.description_html = response.json().get("description_html")
response_description_binary = response.json().get(
"description_binary"
)
- issue.description_binary = base64.b64decode(
- response_description_binary
- )
+ if response_description_binary:
+ try:
+ issue.description_binary = base64.b64decode(
+ response_description_binary
+ )
+ except (TypeError, ValueError):
+ return Response(
+ {"error": "Invalid binary data received"},
+ status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY,
+ )
+ else:
+ issue.description_binary = NoneLikely invalid or redundant comment.
| response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None) | ||
| except requests.RequestException: | ||
| return Response( | ||
| {"error": "Failed to connect to the external service"}, | ||
| status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add timeout to external service request
The request to the external service should have a timeout to prevent hanging.
Apply this diff:
- response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None)
+ response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None, timeout=10)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None) | |
| except requests.RequestException: | |
| return Response( | |
| {"error": "Failed to connect to the external service"}, | |
| status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY, | |
| ) | |
| response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None, timeout=10) | |
| except requests.RequestException: | |
| return Response( | |
| {"error": "Failed to connect to the external service"}, | |
| status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY, | |
| ) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[warning] 397-397: apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py#L397
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 397-397: apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/draft.py#L397
The application was found using the requests module without configuring a timeout value for connections.
| issue = DraftIssue.objects.filter(pk=pk, workspace__slug=slug).first() | ||
| if issue is None: | ||
| return Response( | ||
| {"error": "Issue not found"}, | ||
| status=404, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add exception handling for database query
The database query could raise exceptions that should be handled gracefully.
Apply this diff:
- issue = DraftIssue.objects.filter(pk=pk, workspace__slug=slug).first()
- if issue is None:
+ try:
+ issue = DraftIssue.objects.get(pk=pk, workspace__slug=slug)
+ except DraftIssue.DoesNotExist:
return Response(
{"error": "Issue not found"},
status=404,
)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| issue = DraftIssue.objects.filter(pk=pk, workspace__slug=slug).first() | |
| if issue is None: | |
| return Response( | |
| {"error": "Issue not found"}, | |
| status=404, | |
| ) | |
| try: | |
| issue = DraftIssue.objects.get(pk=pk, workspace__slug=slug) | |
| except DraftIssue.DoesNotExist: | |
| return Response( | |
| {"error": "Issue not found"}, | |
| status=404, | |
| ) |
| binary_data = issue.description_binary | ||
|
|
||
| def stream_data(): | ||
| if binary_data: | ||
| yield binary_data | ||
| else: | ||
| yield b"" | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for binary data access
The code should validate the binary data before attempting to stream it.
Apply this diff:
- binary_data = issue.description_binary
-
def stream_data():
- if binary_data:
- yield binary_data
- else:
- yield b""
+ def stream_data():
+ if not hasattr(issue, 'description_binary') or issue.description_binary is None:
+ yield b""
+ return
+ yield issue.description_binary📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| binary_data = issue.description_binary | |
| def stream_data(): | |
| if binary_data: | |
| yield binary_data | |
| else: | |
| yield b"" | |
| def stream_data(): | |
| if not hasattr(issue, 'description_binary') or issue.description_binary is None: | |
| yield b"" | |
| return | |
| yield issue.description_binary |
| base_url = f"{settings.LIVE_BASE_URL}/resolve-document-conflicts/" | ||
| try: | ||
| response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None) | ||
| except requests.RequestException: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add timeout to prevent hanging connections
The requests.post call should include a timeout to prevent the request from hanging indefinitely.
Apply this diff:
- response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None)
+ response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None, timeout=10)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| base_url = f"{settings.LIVE_BASE_URL}/resolve-document-conflicts/" | |
| try: | |
| response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None) | |
| except requests.RequestException: | |
| base_url = f"{settings.LIVE_BASE_URL}/resolve-document-conflicts/" | |
| try: | |
| response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None, timeout=10) | |
| except requests.RequestException: |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[warning] 690-690: apiserver/plane/app/views/intake/base.py#L690
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 690-690: apiserver/plane/app/views/intake/base.py#L690
The application was found using the requests module without configuring a timeout value for connections.
| issue = Issue.issue_objects.filter( | ||
| pk=pk, workspace__slug=slug, project_id=project_id | ||
| ).first() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use get_object_or_404 for better error handling.
Replace the filter().first() pattern with get_object_or_404 for cleaner error handling.
Apply this diff:
- issue = Issue.issue_objects.filter(
- pk=pk, workspace__slug=slug, project_id=project_id
- ).first()
- if issue is None:
- return Response(
- {"error": "Issue not found"},
- status=404,
- )
+ issue = get_object_or_404(
+ Issue.issue_objects,
+ pk=pk,
+ workspace__slug=slug,
+ project_id=project_id
+ )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| issue = Issue.issue_objects.filter( | |
| pk=pk, workspace__slug=slug, project_id=project_id | |
| ).first() | |
| issue = get_object_or_404( | |
| Issue.issue_objects, | |
| pk=pk, | |
| workspace__slug=slug, | |
| project_id=project_id | |
| ) |
| base_url = f"{settings.LIVE_BASE_URL}/resolve-document-conflicts/" | ||
| try: | ||
| response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None) | ||
| except requests.RequestException: | ||
| return Response( | ||
| {"error": "Failed to connect to the external service"}, | ||
| status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add timeout and improve error handling for external service call.
The request to the external service needs a timeout and better error handling.
Apply this diff:
base_url = f"{settings.LIVE_BASE_URL}/resolve-document-conflicts/"
try:
- response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None)
+ response = requests.post(
+ base_url,
+ json=data,
+ headers=None,
+ timeout=5
+ )
except requests.RequestException:
return Response(
{"error": "Failed to connect to the external service"},
status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY,
)
+ except requests.Timeout:
+ return Response(
+ {"error": "Request to external service timed out"},
+ status=status.HTTP_504_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT,
+ )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| base_url = f"{settings.LIVE_BASE_URL}/resolve-document-conflicts/" | |
| try: | |
| response = requests.post(base_url, json=data, headers=None) | |
| except requests.RequestException: | |
| return Response( | |
| {"error": "Failed to connect to the external service"}, | |
| status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY, | |
| ) | |
| base_url = f"{settings.LIVE_BASE_URL}/resolve-document-conflicts/" | |
| try: | |
| response = requests.post( | |
| base_url, | |
| json=data, | |
| headers=None, | |
| timeout=5 | |
| ) | |
| except requests.RequestException: | |
| return Response( | |
| {"error": "Failed to connect to the external service"}, | |
| status=status.HTTP_502_BAD_GATEWAY, | |
| ) | |
| except requests.Timeout: | |
| return Response( | |
| {"error": "Request to external service timed out"}, | |
| status=status.HTTP_504_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT, | |
| ) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[warning] 774-774: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L774
Requests call without timeout
[warning] 774-774: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py#L774
The application was found using the requests module without configuring a timeout value for connections.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (3)
Line range hint
56-60: Add null check for workspace propertyThe current implementation assumes that
projectDetails.workspaceis always defined. Consider adding an additional null check to prevent potential runtime errors.- const { duplicateIssues } = useDebouncedDuplicateIssues(projectDetails?.workspace.toString(), projectDetails?.id, { + const { duplicateIssues } = useDebouncedDuplicateIssues(projectDetails?.workspace?.toString(), projectDetails?.id, { name: issue?.name, description_html: getTextContent(issue?.description_html), issueId: issue?.id, });
109-111: Memoize the update handler to prevent unnecessary re-rendersThe update handler function is recreated on every render. Consider using
useCallbackto memoize it.+ const handleDescriptionUpdate = useCallback( + async (data: string) => { + await issueOperations.updateDescription(workspaceSlug, issue.project_id ?? "", issue.id, data); + }, + [issueOperations, workspaceSlug, issue.project_id, issue.id] + ); return ( // ... <IssueDescriptionInput // ... - updateDescription={async (data) => - await issueOperations.updateDescription(workspaceSlug, issue.project_id ?? "", issue.id, data) - } + updateDescription={handleDescriptionUpdate} // ... /> );
102-117: Consider handling loading state for description_binaryThe component only renders when
description_binaryis defined, but it might be better to show a loading state instead of nothing when the value is undefined.- {issue.description_binary !== undefined && ( + {issue.description_binary !== undefined ? ( <IssueDescriptionInput key={issue.id} containerClassName="-ml-3 border-none" descriptionBinary={issue.description_binary} descriptionHTML={issue.description_html ?? "<p></p>"} disabled={disabled} updateDescription={handleDescriptionUpdate} issueId={issue.id} projectId={issue.project_id} setIsSubmitting={(value) => setIsSubmitting(value)} workspaceSlug={workspaceSlug} /> + ) : ( + <div className="h-24 w-full animate-pulse rounded-md bg-gray-100" /> + )}web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (1)
74-95: Add aria-label to improve accessibility.The loading state should indicate its purpose to screen readers.
- <Loader className="min-h-[120px] max-h-64 space-y-2 overflow-hidden rounded-md"> + <Loader + className="min-h-[120px] max-h-64 space-y-2 overflow-hidden rounded-md" + aria-label="Loading issue description editor" + >web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx (1)
97-99: Enhance input validationThe validation message should specify which required fields are missing to help with debugging.
- if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issueId) { - throw new Error("Required fields missing while updating binary description"); + if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issueId) { + const missingFields = [ + !workspaceSlug && "workspaceSlug", + !projectId && "projectId", + !issueId && "issueId", + ].filter(Boolean); + throw new Error(`Missing required fields: ${missingFields.join(", ")}`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx(9 hunks)web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx(3 hunks)web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx
- web/core/components/inbox/content/issue-root.tsx
- web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/main-content.tsx
- web/core/hooks/use-issue-description.ts
🔇 Additional comments (8)
web/core/components/issues/description-input.tsx (5)
33-33: Specify a more precise return type for updateDescription.
Using Promise<ArrayBuffer> would be more type-safe than implicitly allowing any other binary type.
- updateDescription: (data: string) => Promise<ArrayBuffer>;
+ updateDescription: (data: string) => Promise<ArrayBuffer>;37-61: LGTM! Clean component initialization.
The component initialization follows React best practices with proper hooks usage and clean props destructuring.
63-71: Add missing dependencies to useCallback.
The empty dependency array could lead to stale closures. The callback depends on resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription and setIsSubmitting.
const debouncedDescriptionSave = useCallback(
debounce(async (updatedDescription: Uint8Array) => {
const editor = editorRef.current;
if (!editor) return;
const encodedDescription = convertBinaryDataToBase64String(updatedDescription);
await resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription(encodedDescription, editor);
setIsSubmitting("submitted");
}, 1500),
- []
+ [resolveConflictsAndUpdateDescription, setIsSubmitting]
);113-129: Implement error boundary for file upload failures.
While the try-catch block handles immediate errors, implementing an error boundary would provide a more robust error handling strategy.
98-141: LGTM! Clean implementation of collaborative editing.
The conditional rendering between collaborative and read-only editors is well implemented. The file upload integration is properly handled with appropriate error handling.
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx (3)
42-42: LGTM!
The updateIssueDescription import is correctly added to support the new description update functionality.
341-341: LGTM!
The updateIssueDescription dependency is correctly added to the useMemo dependency array, maintaining proper React hooks usage.
96-105: Verify conflict handling implementation
While the binary description update functionality is implemented, let's verify that conflict handling is implemented in the upstream components or services.
✅ Verification successful
Conflict handling is properly implemented
The codebase shows a comprehensive implementation of conflict handling for issue descriptions:
- The
use-issue-description.tshook implementsresolveConflictsAndUpdateDescriptionwhich handles conflicts and returns conflict-free encoded descriptions - The implementation is integrated with collaborative editing infrastructure:
- Uses real-time collaboration features through
CollaborativeRichTextEditor - Has proper conflict resolution at the editor level with collaborative editing hooks
- Maintains server synchronization states (
hasServerSynced,hasServerConnectionFailed)
- Uses real-time collaboration features through
The PR's approach to conflict-free descriptions is well implemented through a combination of binary description updates and collaborative editing infrastructure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for conflict handling implementation in related files
# Check for conflict-related code in issue-related files
echo "Searching for conflict handling in issue-related files..."
rg -i "conflict" --type ts --type tsx -g "**/{issue,description}*.{ts,tsx}"
# Check for binary merge or conflict resolution utilities
echo "Searching for merge utilities..."
rg -i "merge|resolve" --type ts --type tsx -g "**/utils/**/*.{ts,tsx}"
# Check for concurrent editing handlers
echo "Searching for concurrent editing handlers..."
rg -i "concurrent|simultaneous" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 586
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for conflict handling implementation in related files with correct file type flags
# Check for conflict-related code in issue-related files
echo "Searching for conflict handling in issue-related files..."
rg -i "conflict" -t typescript -t tsx -g "**/{issue,description}*.{ts,tsx}"
# Check for binary merge or conflict resolution utilities
echo "Searching for merge utilities..."
rg -i "merge|resolve" -t typescript -t tsx -g "**/utils/**/*.{ts,tsx}"
# Look for concurrent editing or real-time collaboration related code
echo "Searching for concurrent editing handlers..."
rg -i "concurrent|simultaneous|realtime|collaborative" -t typescript -t tsx
# Check for any CRDT or operational transform related implementations
echo "Searching for CRDT or OT implementations..."
rg -i "crdt|operational.?transform" -t typescript -t tsx
Length of output: 821
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for conflict handling implementation in related files using basic grep
# Check for conflict-related code in issue-related files
echo "Searching for conflict handling in issue-related files..."
find . -type f -name "*issue*.ts*" -o -name "*description*.ts*" | xargs grep -i "conflict" || true
# Check for binary merge or conflict resolution utilities
echo "Searching for merge utilities..."
find . -type f -path "*/utils/*.ts*" | xargs grep -i "merge\|resolve" || true
# Look for concurrent editing or real-time collaboration related code
echo "Searching for concurrent editing handlers..."
find . -type f -name "*.ts*" | xargs grep -i "concurrent\|simultaneous\|realtime\|collaborative" || true
# Check for any CRDT or operational transform related implementations
echo "Searching for CRDT or OT implementations..."
find . -type f -name "*.ts*" | xargs grep -i "crdt\|operational.transform" || true
Length of output: 15917
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
live/src/server.ts (1)
62-79: Document the endpoint and consider API versioningWhile the implementation is solid, consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to document the endpoint's purpose, expected payload, and response format
- Adding API version prefix for future compatibility
Consider this structure:
-app.post("/resolve-document-conflicts", (req, res) => { +/** + * Resolves conflicts between original document and updates + * @route POST /api/v1/resolve-document-conflicts + * @param {TResolveConflictsRequestBody} req.body - The document conflict resolution payload + * @returns {Object} Resolved document + */ +router.post("/api/v1/resolve-document-conflicts", (req, res) => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
live/src/server.ts(4 hunks)web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts(2 hunks)web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts(2 hunks)web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts(5 hunks)web/core/store/issue/issue-details/root.store.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts
- web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
live/src/server.ts (2)
13-14: LGTM: Clean import additions
The new imports are well-structured and properly support the added functionality.
62-79: Skipping previously mentioned concerns
The following valid concerns were already raised in previous reviews:
- Moving the endpoint into the router
- Using manualLogger for consistent logging
web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM!
The import of TDocumentPayload type is correctly placed and appropriately used.
393-406: Verify integration with conflict resolution system
Since this method is part of the conflict resolution system for issue descriptions, let's verify its integration.
✅ Verification successful
Binary description update implementation follows standard patterns
The implementation follows consistent patterns across the codebase:
- Uses standard ArrayBuffer response type for binary data handling
- Follows the same error handling pattern as other binary operations
- Properly integrated in both issue and inbox-issue stores with appropriate state updates
- Method signature and usage aligns with the service layer architecture
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage patterns and similar binary operations
# Check for method usage
echo "Checking for updateDescriptionBinary usage:"
rg -l "updateDescriptionBinary"
# Check for similar binary operations pattern
echo -e "\nChecking for similar binary operation patterns:"
ast-grep --pattern 'responseType: "arraybuffer"'
# Check for error handling patterns in binary operations
echo -e "\nChecking for binary error handling patterns:"
rg -A 5 "instanceof ArrayBuffer"
Length of output: 610
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the usage patterns more closely
# Check how updateDescriptionBinary is used in inbox-issue service
echo "Usage in inbox-issue.service.ts:"
rg -A 5 "updateDescriptionBinary" web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts
# Check usage in issue store
echo -e "\nUsage in issue.store.ts:"
rg -A 5 "updateDescriptionBinary" web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts
# Check usage in inbox store
echo -e "\nUsage in inbox-issue.store.ts:"
rg -A 5 "updateDescriptionBinary" web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts
# Check for similar binary response handling patterns
echo -e "\nChecking for similar binary response patterns:"
rg -A 5 "responseType.*arraybuffer"
# Look for error handling patterns in these files
echo -e "\nChecking error handling in related files:"
rg "throw.*error\?\.response\?\.data" web/core/services/inbox/inbox-issue.service.ts web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts
Length of output: 129598
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how this method is used in stores and its integration with conflict resolution
# Check usage in issue store
echo "Usage in issue.store.ts:"
rg -B 5 -A 5 "updateDescriptionBinary" web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts
# Check usage in inbox store
echo -e "\nUsage in inbox-issue.store.ts:"
rg -B 5 -A 5 "updateDescriptionBinary" web/core/store/inbox/inbox-issue.store.ts
# Check for conflict resolution related code
echo -e "\nChecking for conflict resolution patterns:"
rg -l "conflict.*description|description.*conflict"
Length of output: 1325
web/core/store/issue/issue-details/root.store.ts (1)
195-195: LGTM: Constructor modification enhances store hierarchy
The updated constructor properly passes both the root store and current store instance, which aligns with the PR's objective of supporting conflict-free issue descriptions.
| app.post("/resolve-document-conflicts", (req, res) => { | ||
| const { original_document, updates } = req.body as TResolveConflictsRequestBody; | ||
| try { | ||
| if (original_document === undefined || updates === undefined) { | ||
| res.status(400).send({ | ||
| message: "Missing required fields", | ||
| }); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| const resolvedDocument = resolveDocumentConflicts(req.body); | ||
| res.status(200).json(resolvedDocument); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| manualLogger.error("Error in /resolve-document-conflicts endpoint:", error); | ||
| res.status(500).send({ | ||
| message: "Internal server error", | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add content-type validation for the request body
While the endpoint correctly validates required fields, it should also validate the content type of the request to ensure proper parsing and prevent potential security issues.
Add content-type validation at the beginning of the handler:
app.post("/resolve-document-conflicts", (req, res) => {
+ if (req.headers['content-type'] !== 'application/json') {
+ return res.status(415).send({
+ message: "Unsupported Media Type: Content-Type must be application/json",
+ });
+ }
const { original_document, updates } = req.body as TResolveConflictsRequestBody;
// ... rest of the code📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| app.post("/resolve-document-conflicts", (req, res) => { | |
| const { original_document, updates } = req.body as TResolveConflictsRequestBody; | |
| try { | |
| if (original_document === undefined || updates === undefined) { | |
| res.status(400).send({ | |
| message: "Missing required fields", | |
| }); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const resolvedDocument = resolveDocumentConflicts(req.body); | |
| res.status(200).json(resolvedDocument); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| manualLogger.error("Error in /resolve-document-conflicts endpoint:", error); | |
| res.status(500).send({ | |
| message: "Internal server error", | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| app.post("/resolve-document-conflicts", (req, res) => { | |
| if (req.headers['content-type'] !== 'application/json') { | |
| return res.status(415).send({ | |
| message: "Unsupported Media Type: Content-Type must be application/json", | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| const { original_document, updates } = req.body as TResolveConflictsRequestBody; | |
| try { | |
| if (original_document === undefined || updates === undefined) { | |
| res.status(400).send({ | |
| message: "Missing required fields", | |
| }); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const resolvedDocument = resolveDocumentConflicts(req.body); | |
| res.status(200).json(resolvedDocument); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| manualLogger.error("Error in /resolve-document-conflicts endpoint:", error); | |
| res.status(500).send({ | |
| message: "Internal server error", | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| }); |
| async updateDescriptionBinary( | ||
| workspaceSlug: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| issueId: string, | ||
| data: Pick<TDocumentPayload, "description_binary"> | ||
| ): Promise<ArrayBuffer> { | ||
| return this.post(`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/issues/${issueId}/description/`, data, { | ||
| responseType: "arraybuffer", | ||
| }) | ||
| .then((response) => response?.data) | ||
| .catch((error) => { | ||
| throw error?.response?.data; | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider HTTP method and error handling improvements
The implementation looks good with proper typing and response handling, but there are two suggestions for improvement:
- Use PUT instead of POST as this is an idempotent operation (updating a description).
- Enhance error handling for binary responses.
Apply this diff:
async updateDescriptionBinary(
workspaceSlug: string,
projectId: string,
issueId: string,
data: Pick<TDocumentPayload, "description_binary">
): Promise<ArrayBuffer> {
- return this.post(`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/issues/${issueId}/description/`, data, {
+ return this.put(`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/issues/${issueId}/description/`, data, {
responseType: "arraybuffer",
})
.then((response) => response?.data)
.catch((error) => {
- throw error?.response?.data;
+ // Handle binary error responses
+ if (error?.response?.data instanceof ArrayBuffer) {
+ const decoder = new TextDecoder();
+ const errorText = decoder.decode(error.response.data);
+ throw new Error(errorText);
+ }
+ throw error?.response?.data || 'Failed to update description';
});
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async updateDescriptionBinary( | |
| workspaceSlug: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| issueId: string, | |
| data: Pick<TDocumentPayload, "description_binary"> | |
| ): Promise<ArrayBuffer> { | |
| return this.post(`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/issues/${issueId}/description/`, data, { | |
| responseType: "arraybuffer", | |
| }) | |
| .then((response) => response?.data) | |
| .catch((error) => { | |
| throw error?.response?.data; | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| async updateDescriptionBinary( | |
| workspaceSlug: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| issueId: string, | |
| data: Pick<TDocumentPayload, "description_binary"> | |
| ): Promise<ArrayBuffer> { | |
| return this.put(`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/issues/${issueId}/description/`, data, { | |
| responseType: "arraybuffer", | |
| }) | |
| .then((response) => response?.data) | |
| .catch((error) => { | |
| // Handle binary error responses | |
| if (error?.response?.data instanceof ArrayBuffer) { | |
| const decoder = new TextDecoder(); | |
| const errorText = decoder.decode(error.response.data); | |
| throw new Error(errorText); | |
| } | |
| throw error?.response?.data || 'Failed to update description'; | |
| }); | |
| } |
| updateIssueDescription = async ( | ||
| workspaceSlug: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| issueId: string, | ||
| descriptionBinary: string | ||
| ) => this.issue.updateIssueDescription(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety and validation for description binary data
While the method implementation aligns with the PR's objective of conflict-free descriptions, consider these improvements:
- Add a type definition for the binary format
- Add validation for the binary string format
- Consider adding error handling for invalid binary data
Example type definition:
type TDescriptionBinary = string & { readonly __brand: unique symbol };
function validateDescriptionBinary(binary: string): TDescriptionBinary {
// Add validation logic here
if (!isValidBinaryFormat(binary))
throw new Error("Invalid description binary format");
return binary as TDescriptionBinary;
}
updateIssueDescription = async (
workspaceSlug: string,
projectId: string,
issueId: string,
descriptionBinary: TDescriptionBinary
) => this.issue.updateIssueDescription(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, descriptionBinary);
…re/conflict-free-issue-description
Improvements
Implemented collaboration(conflict resolving) for rich-text editors. Issue descriptions everywhere now get synced across multiple clients without the worry of data-loss.
Media:
Screen.Recording.2024-10-25.at.15.29.11.mov
Plane issue: WEB-1435
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
InboxIssueServiceandIssueServicewith methods for fetching and updating issue descriptions in binary format.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores