Skip to content

Conversation

@anmolsinghbhatia
Copy link
Collaborator

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia commented Dec 19, 2024

Description

This PR makes the following updates:

  • Removes the workspace-level toggle option from the parent select modal.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Media

Before After
WEB-2808 Before WEB-2808 After

Test Scenarios

  • Verified functionality in all affected areas.

Affected areas:

  • Project Issues:
    • Create/Update modal: Parent select actions.
    • Issue Peek View: Parent properties.
    • Issue Detail Page: Sidebar parent properties.
  • Inbox Issues:
    • Create/Update Intake Issue modal: Parent select actions.
    • Intake Issue Detail Page: Sidebar parent properties.

References

[WEB-2808]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Streamlined the ParentIssuesListModal component by removing workspace-level search functionality.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Eliminated unnecessary state management related to workspace-level searching, simplifying the component's behavior.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the ParentIssuesListModal component in the web application, focusing on simplifying the component's state management. The key change involves removing the isWorkspaceLevel state variable and its associated logic, effectively hardcoding the workspace_search parameter to false. This streamlines the component by eliminating conditional logic related to workspace-level searching and reduces the complexity of the state management.

Changes

File Change Summary
web/core/components/issues/parent-issues-list-modal.tsx - Removed isWorkspaceLevel state variable
- Hardcoded workspace_search to false
- Simplified effect hook by removing isWorkspaceLevel from dependency array
- Removed workspace-level search toggle functionality

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sriramveeraghanta
  • SatishGandham

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through the code we go,
Workspace search state, now laid low
Simplicity reigns, complexity fades
Parent issues dance in clearer shades
A rabbit's refactor, clean and bright! 🔧


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/core/components/issues/parent-issues-list-modal.tsx (1)

Line range hint 31-43: Consider adding documentation about workspace-level search removal

Since this component previously supported workspace-level search, it would be helpful to add a comment in the Props type or component documentation explaining that parent issue search is now exclusively project-scoped. This will help future maintainers understand the intentional limitation.

 type Props = {
   isOpen: boolean;
   handleClose: () => void;
   value?: any;
   onChange: (issue: ISearchIssueResponse) => void;
+  // Note: As of WEB-2808, parent issue search is intentionally limited to project scope
   projectId: string | undefined;
   issueId?: string;
   searchEpic?: boolean;
 };
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51ca353 and f7a87e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/core/components/issues/parent-issues-list-modal.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
web/core/components/issues/parent-issues-list-modal.tsx (2)

12-12: LGTM: Import change is appropriate

The Loader import from @plane/ui is correctly used in the component's loading state implementation.


82-82: LGTM: Effect dependencies are correctly maintained

The dependency array has been properly updated to reflect the removal of the workspace-level toggle state while maintaining all necessary dependencies for the effect hook.

parent: true,
issue_id: issueId,
workspace_search: isWorkspaceLevel,
workspace_search: false,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Hardcoding workspace_search: false requires additional changes

The verification reveals that other components still maintain workspace-level search functionality:

  • command-modal.tsx has an active workspace toggle and uses workspace_search: !projectId ? true : isWorkspaceLevel
  • existing-issues-list-modal.tsx has a workspace toggle UI and uses workspace_search: isWorkspaceLevel

While hardcoding workspace_search: false in parent-issues-list-modal.tsx aligns with other modals like select-duplicate.tsx and bulk-delete-issues-modal.tsx, it creates inconsistency with components that still support workspace-level search. This change should be part of a broader refactoring effort to remove workspace search functionality across all components.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify impact of removing workspace-level search

The hardcoding of workspace_search: false aligns with the PR objective to remove workspace-level toggle. This ensures parent issue search is always project-scoped.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by workspace_search parameter
rg -l "workspace_search" --type ts --type tsx

# Check for any remaining workspace-level toggle UI elements
ast-grep --pattern 'workspace_search = true' 

Length of output: 120


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for workspace_search usage with proper file extension patterns
rg -l "workspace_search" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}'

# Check for any workspace search related UI or logic
rg -A 3 "workspace.*search" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}'

Length of output: 5548

@pushya22 pushya22 merged commit 44d8de1 into preview Dec 19, 2024
12 of 14 checks passed
@pushya22 pushya22 deleted the chore-remove-workspace-toggle-from-issue-parent-modal branch December 19, 2024 08:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants