[PE-47] fix: update fallback logic for newly created pages #6345
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Suggested Reviewers
Suggested Labels
Poem
Possibly Related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/core/hooks/use-page-fallback.ts (1)
43-45: Consider more granular error handling.The current catch-all error handling could be more specific to help with debugging and user feedback.
Consider this approach:
} catch (error) { - console.error("Error in updating description using fallback logic:", error); + if (error instanceof TypeError) { + console.error("Binary data processing error:", error); + } else if (error instanceof Error) { + console.error("Description update failed:", error.message); + } else { + console.error("Unknown error in fallback logic:", error); + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
web/core/hooks/use-page-fallback.ts(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: lint-web
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/core/hooks/use-page-fallback.ts (4)
3-3: LGTM! Type safety improvements.Good improvements in type safety by:
- Specifying
Promise<ArrayBuffer>instead ofPromise<any>- Adding the necessary import for fallback content generation
Also applies to: 11-11
24-42: LGTM! Robust fallback implementation.The implementation correctly handles the edge cases mentioned in the PR objectives:
- Properly checks for empty/null description binary
- Provides appropriate fallback content
- Maintains data consistency across binary, HTML, and JSON formats
Line range hint
1-54: Implementation successfully addresses PR objectives.The changes effectively solve the original issue with null/empty ArrayBuffer handling while adding:
- Improved type safety
- Better error handling
- Proper fallback content generation
48-54: Verify auto-save behavior with connection failures.The implementation looks correct, but let's verify the interaction between
useAutoSaveand connection failure states.Let's check for any existing auto-save related issues or patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Auto-save behavior with connection failures is correctly implemented
The code ensures that auto-save updates only occur during connection failures through proper guards, while also triggering immediate updates when failures occur.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useAutoSave implementations and connection handling echo "Checking useAutoSave implementations:" rg -A 5 "useAutoSave" --type ts echo "\nChecking connection failure handling patterns:" rg -A 5 "hasConnectionFailed" --type tsLength of output: 3987
Description
This PR fixes the fallback logic for saving page description of a newly created page.
Changes made-
When
description_binaryisnullor an emptyArrayBufferreturned by the backend, in case of a new page, we generate a new description binary using empty p tags,<p></p>, as the source of truth.Type of Change
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Refactor