-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
chore: bypass interceptors for unauthorized errors for few auth related endpoints #6351
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a consistent modification across multiple service classes ( Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/services/src/instance/instance.service.ts (2)
32-35: LGTM! Consider enhancing the documentation.The implementation correctly adds
validateStatus: nullto bypass interceptors for unauthorized errors. This aligns with similar changes in AuthService.Consider adding a brief explanation of why bypassing interceptors is necessary for this endpoint. This would help future maintainers understand the rationale behind this configuration.
59-62: LGTM! Consider a more centralized approach for interceptor bypassing.The implementation correctly adds
validateStatus: nullto bypass interceptors for unauthorized errors, maintaining consistency with other auth-related endpoints.Since we're seeing a pattern of bypassing interceptors for multiple auth-related endpoints, consider:
- Creating a base configuration object for these endpoints
- Adding a utility method in
APIServicethat automatically applies this configuration to specified endpoints- Maintaining a list of endpoints that require interceptor bypassing in a central configuration
This would make the code more maintainable and reduce repetition. Would you like me to provide an example implementation?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/services/src/auth/auth.service.ts(1 hunks)packages/services/src/instance/instance.service.ts(2 hunks)packages/services/src/user/user.service.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: lint-admin
- GitHub Check: lint-web
- GitHub Check: lint-space
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/services/src/user/user.service.ts (2)
25-25: LGTM! Clear documentation of the new behavior.The added JSDoc remark clearly documents the use of
validateStatus: nulland its purpose.
Line range hint
28-33: Verify error handling in consuming code.The implementation looks good and aligns with the PR objective to bypass interceptors for unauthorized errors. However, since this changes how errors are handled, we should verify the impact.
Let's check how this method is used across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Error handling verification completed successfully
The consuming code in
user.store.tsproperly handles errors using try-catch blocks around theadminDetails()call, ensuring that the modified error handling won't cause any issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for uses of adminDetails() to verify error handling expectations rg -A 5 "adminDetails\(\)" --type tsLength of output: 971
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the error handling in user.store.ts rg -B 5 -A 10 "adminDetails\(\)" admin/core/store/user.store.ts # Check git history for the specific changes git log -L :adminDetails:packages/services/src/user/user.service.ts # Look for test files that might be testing this functionality fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs rg "adminDetails"Length of output: 824
packages/services/src/auth/auth.service.ts (2)
25-25: LGTM! Clear documentation of the interceptor bypass.The added remark clearly documents the purpose of using
validateStatus: null.
28-28: LGTM! Correctly bypasses interceptors for CSRF token requests.The addition of
validateStatus: nullaligns with the PR objective and is particularly relevant for CSRF token requests that might occur during unauthorized states.Let's verify if this pattern is consistently applied across other auth-related endpoints in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: validateStatus: null is consistently implemented across auth-related endpoints
The pattern is properly applied and documented across all endpoints that need to handle unauthorized states, including user info, instance info, and CSRF token endpoints.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other auth-related GET endpoints that might need similar treatment ast-grep --pattern 'class $service extends APIService { $$$ $method($$$) { $$$ this.get($$$) $$$ } $$$ }' # Search for existing validateStatus usage patterns rg "validateStatus" --type tsLength of output: 1474
packages/services/src/instance/instance.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
35-39: Verify consistent error handling across auth-related endpoints.Let's ensure all auth-related endpoints follow the same pattern of bypassing interceptors.
Also applies to: 62-66
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is consistent across auth-related endpoints
The codebase shows consistent error handling patterns:
validateStatus: nullis correctly used in all endpoints that need to bypass interceptors (auth, instance, and user services)- Error handling follows a uniform pattern of throwing response data across these services
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all auth-related API calls in the codebase echo "Searching for auth-related API endpoints..." rg -t typescript "this\.(get|post|put|patch|delete)\(.*api.*auth.*\)" packages/ # Search for existing uses of validateStatus echo -e "\nChecking existing uses of validateStatus..." rg -t typescript "validateStatus.*null" packages/ # Look for similar service classes echo -e "\nChecking for other service classes..." fd -e ts -e tsx --full-path ".*service\.ts" packages/Length of output: 1872
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for auth-related API endpoints and their error handling echo "Checking auth.service.ts content..." cat packages/services/src/auth/auth.service.ts echo -e "\nSearching for validateStatus usage across services..." rg "validateStatus" packages/services/src/ echo -e "\nSearching for error handling patterns in services..." rg "\.catch\(\s*(error|err)\s*=>" packages/services/src/Length of output: 5917
Description
Updated few auth related methods to use { validateStatus: null } for bypassing interceptors handling unauthorized errors.
Type of Change
Screenshots and Media (if applicable)
Test Scenarios
References
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation
The changes focus on refining service-level error management to provide more robust and predictable API interactions.