Skip to content

Conversation

@prateekshourya29
Copy link
Member

@prateekshourya29 prateekshourya29 commented Feb 7, 2025

Description

Removed an unnecessary useEffect that set the default Unsplash image.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Improvement (change that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Code refactoring
  • Performance improvements
  • Documentation update

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated image selection behavior: the component no longer auto-selects an image when none is specified. Users will now need to manually choose their desired image, while all other image interactions remain consistent.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request removes the automatic state update from the image-picker-popover component. Previously, a useEffect hook monitored changes to the unsplashImages and value properties; if the value was null, it triggered the onChange callback with the first image URL. With the removal of this hook, the component no longer performs automatic updates based on unsplashImages. Other functionalities such as image uploading and handling user interactions remain unchanged. No public API declarations were modified.

Changes

File Change Summary
web/core/.../image-picker-popover.tsx Removed the useEffect hook that automatically called onChange when unsplashImages updated and value was null

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant C as ImagePickerPopover
  participant U as Unsplash Service
  participant O as onChange Callback
  
  Note over C,U: Previous Flow
  U->>C: Fetch unsplashImages
  C->>O: useEffect triggers onChange if value is null
  O-->>C: Component state updated
Loading
sequenceDiagram
  participant C as ImagePickerPopover
  participant U as Unsplash Service
  participant O as onChange Callback
  
  Note over C: New Flow after removal
  U->>C: Fetch unsplashImages
  C-->>O: No automatic onChange call triggered
  Note right of C: Updates occur only on user interaction
Loading

Suggested labels

🌐frontend, 🧹chore

Suggested reviewers

  • sriramveeraghanta
  • SatishGandham

Poem

Oh, I’m a rabbit, hopping with delight,
In code burrows where changes shine so bright.
The auto hook is gone, no more its call,
Now user action leads, one and all.
With a twitch of my nose, I celebrate this night!
🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/core/components/core/image-picker-popover.tsx (1)

1-373: Component behavior improvement.

The removal of automatic default image setting is a positive change because:

  1. It gives users more control over image selection
  2. Prevents unexpected state updates
  3. Aligns with React best practices by avoiding unnecessary side effects

This change follows the principle of predictable state management, where state changes should be explicit and user-driven rather than automatic.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a6b50a and dc25528.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/core/components/core/image-picker-popover.tsx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/core/components/core/image-picker-popover.tsx (1)

3-3: LGTM! Removal of unnecessary useEffect import.

The removal of the useEffect hook from imports aligns with the component's simplified behavior, where the default image is no longer automatically set.

@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta merged commit 2b595cf into preview Feb 7, 2025
12 of 14 checks passed
@sriramveeraghanta sriramveeraghanta deleted the fix-cover-image-picker branch February 7, 2025 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants