[WEB-3370] fix: cmd+k work item actions #6617
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes update the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant CM as CommandModal
participant II as useIssueDetail
participant SWR as useSWR
U->>CM: Activate command palette
CM->>II: Fetch issue details using workItem
II->>SWR: Request data with key (workspaceSlug, projectIdentifier, sequence_id)
SWR-->>II: Return issueDetails
II-->>CM: Provide issueDetails
CM->>CM: Update state & process search results
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
web/core/components/command-palette/command-modal.tsx (2)
70-70: Consider handling potential errors from fetched data.
While fetching issue details viafetchIssueWithIdentifier, consider implementing error handling or fallback UI in case the request fails or returns an error.
82-88: Add an error boundary or fallback for SWR fetch.
Currently, if the SWR fetch fails, the component may not render helpful feedback. Consider an error state or fallback UI to improve UX whenfetchIssueWithIdentifierreturns an error.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
web/core/components/command-palette/command-modal.tsx(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/core/components/command-palette/command-modal.tsx (4)
32-39: All new hooks look properly imported and utilized.
The addition ofuseIssueDetailalongside other hooks complements the new logic. No immediate concerns.
54-54: Parameter renaming aligns with new work item approach.
ExtractingworkItemfromuseParams()is consistent with the updated logic.
79-80: Verify workItem format to avoid undefined sequence_id.
SplittingworkItemby-assumes it always contains a dash. If it doesn't,sequence_idwill be undefined. Confirm this format is enforced or handle it gracefully (e.g., show an error message).Would you like a script to search for all references of
workItemto confirm correct usage throughout the code?
91-91: Short-circuiting for issueId is cleanly done.
AccessingissueDetails?.idensures safety against null or undefined values. No changes needed.
* fix: cmd+k work item actions * chore: code refactor
Description
This PR includes fix for command k work item actions.
Type of Change
References
[WEB-3370]
Summary by CodeRabbit